That's just silly. It's absolutely not moronic to wonder about things we can never experience. Wonder is the beginning of science.How could one possibly know one way or the other? Perhaps the responses should be limited to only those males with interchangeable penises -- small and large. Their opinion would be the only valid opinion because they're the only ones who could know. THIS JUST IN! Oh, there ARE no men with interchangeable penises so the OP's question and my solution are both moronic? Okay, I guess you're right.
I've done a few questionnaires about this trying to find out if bigger means more. I think, from the answers that it's a yes.Was a discussion I've seen on Reddit before. This isn't talking about how large cocks do or don't give more pleasure...but for those os us with big members do we actually EXPERIENCE more pleasure ourselves? When jerking off, orgasming, etc
There are couple of theories to this:
1) Bigger/thicker cocks having more nerve endings and thus experience more pleasure simply by surface area
2) Orgasms are more intense since the contractions (in theory) would be harder and more intense to get the cum out of our longer "cannons"
And then there is the other side where there's no correlation whatsoever. Where nerve endings are essentially the same regardless of cock size. I probably lean toward "no correlation" but interesting to discuss regardless
You can wonder to your heart's content. My point is that the OP asked a question for which there can be no null hypothesis because no one person can experience both states. If wonder is the beginning of science, then the scientific method is what separates wonder from knowledge.That's just silly. It's absolutely not moronic to wonder about things we can never experience. Wonder is the beginning of science.
Ah, the beauty of discourse. Isn't it enlightening when someone insists on viewing a hypothetical discussion through a lens of rigid pragmatism? But, for the sake of intellectual curiosity, even the greatest scientific minds often begin with questions that don't fit neatly into empirical boxes. After all, speculation and wonder have always been the predecessors of knowledge. Cheers to those of us still willing to explore beyond the confines of the immediately verifiable, than if not for anything else, than the thought of speculation and wonder.You can wonder to your heart's content. My point is that the OP asked a question for which there can be no null hypothesis because no one person can experience both states. If wonder is the beginning of science, then the scientific method is what separates wonder from knowledge.
Ah, the beauty of discourse. Isn't it enlightening when someone insists on viewing a hypothetical discussion through a lens of rigid pragmatism? But, for the sake of intellectual curiosity, even the greatest scientific minds often begin with questions that don't fit neatly into empirical boxes. After all, speculation and wonder have always been the predecessors of knowledge. Cheers to those of us still willing to explore beyond the confines of the immediately verifiable, than if not for anything else, than the thought of speculation and wonder
Your "reality" is less about insight and more about peak condescension. They say ignorance is bliss, and you seem utterly ecstatic.Yes. Hip, hip, hooray for people living in their fantasies. Three cheers for those who recruit others to indulge their fantasies. Now that you feel better, I'll go back to living in a satisfying reality.
My insight is that the OP's query is unprovable and absurd. Because everyone knows it is unprovable it is intended as fodder for fantasy speculation such as, Poster 1: "I have a 16" x 9" cock and experience twice the pleasure as one half my size; or, Poster 2: "Well I am an average 5.5" x 4.75" and I feel more pleasure than any other cock in existence;" or, Poster 3: "I'm also 16" x 9" but I experience no pleasure because my nudist dad is actually bigger than me;" or Poster 4: "You're dad sounds hot."Your "reality" is less about insight and more about peak condescension. They say ignorance is bliss, and you seem utterly ecstatic.
I have a very thick cock. I can’t say if it gives me more pleasure than what other guys get but I sure get a huge amount of pleasure out of stretching girl’s holes, having them struggle to take it, knowing I’m prob one of the biggest they’ve had, getting their pussy or ass gaping wide from laying my pipe - . Love itI would guess that men with longer and thicker cocks would have more pleasure because of how their partners react to their bigger cocks. I am bisexual. I have had wonder pleasure with both sees. The possibility of longer, slower strokes gives unbelievable pleasure to both individuals. I have videos of both taken while. Of course I have no way of knowing how much pleasure a man of lesser size experiences. The closest I could get would be to only stroke between 5 or 6 inches deep during sex. Of course that will not yield a true experience. So bottom line...what difference does it make so long as each man enjoys, to the fullest extent, his sexual escapades.
I want u to open me wide tooI have a very thick cock. I can’t say if it gives me more pleasure than what other guys get but I sure get a huge amount of pleasure out of stretching girl’s holes, having them struggle to take it, knowing I’m prob one of the biggest they’ve had, getting their pussy or ass gaping wide from laying my pipe - . Love it
YesWas a discussion I've seen on Reddit before. This isn't talking about how large cocks do or don't give more pleasure...but for those os us with big members do we actually EXPERIENCE more pleasure ourselves? When jerking off, orgasming, etc
There are couple of theories to this:
1) Bigger/thicker cocks having more nerve endings and thus experience more pleasure simply by surface area
2) Orgasms are more intense since the contractions (in theory) would be harder and more intense to get the cum out of our longer "cannons"
And then there is the other side where there's no correlation whatsoever. Where nerve endings are essentially the same regardless of cock size. I probably lean toward "no correlation" but interesting to discuss regardless