Do females like low-hangers?

Discussion in 'New Member Introductions' started by Imported, Jul 18, 2003.

  1. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    hawl: I wasn't given an owner's manual with this equipment so please bear with me. In my wanderings through the Internet I have learned (I think mostly through noticing ads for gay sites) that I posess (though not to a freakish degree) a testicular/scrotal combination known as "low-hangers", and that this seems to be considered a plus by a good chunk of gay men. My question for all those lacking a Y-chromosome: is it also a plus for you, and if so how, and to what degree? Obviously I don't expect it's a deal-closer or will bring me any $, but I'm curious because almost by definition it involves greater "size", it affects the overall visual vibe, and I do remember a girlfriend enjoying the sack slapping against her during some relaxed missionary. Also, if any of the XX's chose to expound their thoughts, feelings, and experiences concerning ball size etc. I don't think anyone would mind (to say the least).
     
  2. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    AnonyMs: ..
     
  3. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    hawl: [quote author=AnonyMs link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#1 date=07/18/03 at 20:08:49]Again, this is a condition I would never not love a truly fantastic guy for, but if I had my druthers, I would prefer the high hangers, so to speak...
    But that is just me....  and has nothing to do with the quality of his character or his love making abilities....
    [/quote]Fool! My low-hangers are so hot! Just kidding. Thank you for your honesty. Maybe you could make a fortune counseling those guys (maybe they don't exist outside of the Internet) who attach weights, use pumps, etc. and take freaky pictures of results that leave me way in the dust. I know very little about the subject of low-hangers. Apparently I just own them. Probably plenty of guys do, I've definitely seen guys in my league in porn (I think of Steve Holmes and Lee Stone for example) who never call attention to it. I'm always looking for any edge with the fine ladies (at least I'm honest about it), and it is weird to be objectified in one more way by the gay porn community. Maybe I'm still reeling from checking out the "Bulge Report" site before it became subscription-only.Talk about "the hunter becoming the hunted". It was very funny at times but even if I weren't straight and hung I think it would give me pause about who's out there. These guys feverishly seeking the identity of some allegedly freakishly bulging bartender they remember from Toronto in the late 80's etc.. I guess everyone follows a dream.... I read some rumor about a celebrity feeling he was hanging too low with age and getting a "testicle tuck" so maybe this part of the package is more malleable than the penis. I wonder if you're born with pretty much one of two hanging options, or if it's very complicated with all kinds of subtle gradations. Do these guys on these sites even investigate any of these questions, or do they just grunt, add some more attached weight, and estimate their new underwear size?
     
  4. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    throb919: What's that you said, rrrrrr...? Couldn't hear you for all the weights clanging together dangling from my
    s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d ballsac! :D I am so just kidding; no clangling or dangling here. Not much floppin' either: always pretty high-and-tight. Guess that's the option I came equipped with. Since you didn't get the low-hangers owners manual, I've got to ask: have you discovered "tea-bagging" yet...? (Any of the ladies want to take over from here...?)
     
  5. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    hawl: [quote author=throb919 link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#3 date=07/18/03 at 21:54:33] Since you didn't get the low-hangers owners manual, I've got to ask: have you discovered "tea-bagging" yet...? (Any of the ladies want to take over from here...?)[/quote] I'm aware of the practice of tea-bagging but can't say I have extensive experience with it. Perhaps my balls just aren't that sensitive. Also, as you can perhaps see from the number of impassioned responses to my original post, performance of the act has not appeared to be an instinctual, intense female craving. No woman has thus far offered me money or car keys to satisfy her unquenchable tea-bagging needs.
     
  6. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    gigantikok: asking the question as to whether or not women collectively give the thumbs up to low hangers is as pointless as asking men whether or not they perfer large vaginal lips. This is pretty much up to the individual. Some fetishists will REALLY love your low hangers, but it is not like asking whether or not men prefer large breasts. Either way, I highly doubt women will ever come onto you OR reject you because your balls hang low. If you are well endowed, i think it is more likely they will come onto you or reject you for that reason.
     
  7. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    prepky: TEA BAGGING????? sorry i must be slow on my slang terms?? I have heard of it, Just dont know what it is (kinda got an idea)
     
  8. Zot57

    Zot57 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    360
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    [quote author=prepky link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#6 date=07/27/03 at 05:44:39]TEA BAGGING????? sorry i must be slow on my slang terms?? I have heard of it, Just dont know what it is (kinda got an idea)[/quote]

    I didn't know about it either until I saw the John Waters film
    Pecker ... Its when a guy stands over someone and kind of
    bounces his balls over their head or face.

    The motion is somewhat the same as one does with a tea bag.
    It works best with big floppy low hanging balls.

    -- Erik
     
  9. B_DoubleMeatWhopper

    B_DoubleMeatWhopper New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,402
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Louisiana
    [quote author=Zot57 link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#7 date=07/27/03 at 09:07:46]Its when a guy stands over someone and kind of
    bounces his balls over their head or face.
    [/quote]

    Unless the terminology has changed, that's not what is. Teabagging = ball-sucking. Is this how others here have heard the term used, or do we use the word differently in New Orleans?
     
  10. D_Martin van Burden

    D_Martin van Burden Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,365
    Likes Received:
    6
    I figured ball sucking was just that... ball sucking, and if anything, a variation or an enhancement to standard issue fellatio.

    The Rotten.com sex library defines [link=http://www.rotten.com/library/sex/teabagging/]teabagging[/link] as dipping one's balls into someone's mouth or upon their face, or in an even more loose context, face-to-genital contact. According to the site linked, the popular filmmaker John Waters found the practice to be rather abhorrent himself (surprisingly enough!).
     
  11. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    throb919: [quote author=DoubleMeatWhopper link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#8 date=07/27/03 at 13:28:32]
    Teabagging = ball-sucking. Is this how others here have heard the term used, or do we use the word differently in New Orleans?
    [/quote]
    That's what it means in North Carolina too, DMW. Maybe you and I have the Southern slant. Or the gay slant. Or the Southern gay slant. The motion with a teabag (as Erik mentioned) happens in a cup; you've got to be dipping your teabag into something = a mouth = ball-sucking. (It would seem to me that floppin' your balls on someone's face would be called floppin' your balls on someone's face. And a sloppy way to make a cup o' tea, at that...)
     
  12. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    gigantikok: Wow, really seems like John Waters nationalized and spread that term out to the masses. I learned what teabagging was from the film, as well. And whenever i've heard referrences to it, it's usually been the John Water's definition, not "ball-sucking".
     
  13. D_Martin van Burden

    D_Martin van Burden Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,365
    Likes Received:
    6
    [quote author=throb919 link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#10 date=07/27/03 at 20:08:13]...you've got to be dipping your teabag into something = a mouth = ball-sucking.[/quote]

    Good point, but the cup and water is a passive receptacle into which someone drops a bag of tea for brewing. The water is the medium in which the tea brews, and to accelerate that, we tend to drop and raise repeatedly the bag into the water.

    Likewise, in teabagging, though the bagged one may respond by sucking on the balls, the bagger takes the assertive motion in dipping down and "flopping" upon the bagged. Heh, perhaps I've read way too much sociological and feminist philosophical literature, but teabagging has a certain degree of power play (i.e. someone being assaulted with yon nuts) to it that the term "ball sucking" doesn't quite specify or pinpoint.
     
  14. B_DoubleMeatWhopper

    B_DoubleMeatWhopper New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,402
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Louisiana
  15. Zot57

    Zot57 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    360
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    [quote author=DoubleMeatWhopper link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#13 date=07/28/03 at 12:47:19]Perhaps I should clarify. I didn't mean that the one teabagging was the one sucking balls, but rather was the one presenting his balls to be sucked. Before John Waters's interpretation, I'd always heard it used to mean lowering one's scrotum into his partner's mouth for oral testicular stimulation. Here are a couple of links that support that definition:

    http://www.blowjobs-oral-sex-positions-tips.com/teabagging.html

    http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200209180007/permalink [/quote]

    Thanks for providing the links ... as I said, I learned the
    term from the John Waters film, which wasn't totally explicit.

    I think I have a few ideas for the next time I happen to
    be with someone with big floppy balls.

    -- Erik
     
  16. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    throb919: Let me guess, Erik: a threesome with you, your partner, and Earl Grey...?!
     
  17. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    longelephantballs: I have to agree with gigantikok,
    There are some who are really into low hangers, others could care less one way or the other, and others who don't care for them.
    In my case I've found the ones who are interested and point them out, also tend to be very vocal about it.
     
  18. Imported

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    56,713
    Likes Received:
    55
    KidBroTrouble: On a recent episode of Sex & the City Samantha (Kim Cattrall) explained teabagging as "taking his balls in your mouth". I'll accept her definition since she's my favorite character on the show.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted