hawl: [quote author=AnonyMs link=board=meetgreet;num=1058578590;start=0#1 date=07/18/03 at 20:08:49]Again, this is a condition I would never not love a truly fantastic guy for, but if I had my druthers, I would prefer the high hangers, so to speak...
But that is just me.... and has nothing to do with the quality of his character or his love making abilities.... [/quote]Fool! My low-hangers are so hot! Just kidding. Thank you for your honesty. Maybe you could make a fortune counseling those guys (maybe they don't exist outside of the Internet) who attach weights, use pumps, etc. and take freaky pictures of results that leave me way in the dust. I know very little about the subject of low-hangers. Apparently I just own them. Probably plenty of guys do, I've definitely seen guys in my league in porn (I think of Steve Holmes and Lee Stone for example) who never call attention to it. I'm always looking for any edge with the fine ladies (at least I'm honest about it), and it is weird to be objectified in one more way by the gay porn community. Maybe I'm still reeling from checking out the "Bulge Report" site before it became subscription-only.Talk about "the hunter becoming the hunted". It was very funny at times but even if I weren't straight and hung I think it would give me pause about who's out there. These guys feverishly seeking the identity of some allegedly freakishly bulging bartender they remember from Toronto in the late 80's etc.. I guess everyone follows a dream.... I read some rumor about a celebrity feeling he was hanging too low with age and getting a "testicle tuck" so maybe this part of the package is more malleable than the penis. I wonder if you're born with pretty much one of two hanging options, or if it's very complicated with all kinds of subtle gradations. Do these guys on these sites even investigate any of these questions, or do they just grunt, add some more attached weight, and estimate their new underwear size?