Do Gay men have bigger penises?
- Thread starter hoggindaz
- Start date
bigguy11211
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Posts
- 125
- Media
- 5
- Likes
- 8
- Points
- 103
- Location
- London, UK
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Yes "on average." However the very biggest I know about were on guys who were actively (not just potentially or occasionally) bi. Straight guys are also a lot less accurate about estimating themselves (and surprisingly are often on the underestimating side). Bis and gays know where they stand, which doesn't mean they always tell the truth.
Duh... Did you ever stop to think that maybe gay guys are more likely too be into looking at big cocks then str8 guys? Maybe that's why there are more gays than str8s here? Not weird at all.
In my opinion yes, gays have bigger penises than str8 guys on average. Here in New York I have gone to gyms where most of the guys were str8 and some had big some small...but in the gyms frequented mostly by gays you see alot of guys with unusually large members. It's not just me, I have heard other guys tell me this too. I think the whole feminized brain thing must have something to do with it.
I see more big cocks on straight porn.
I don't know. A straight friend made this remark before (that gay guys are more hung) but i never took it seriously. I've seen some huge straight guys at the gym. And I've seen small gay guys everywhere.
I don't think there's a practical way of judging from experience because gays tend to have more partners so they're more visible. If a gay guy is hung he'll probably have more opportunities to be seen.
Straight guys will be in steady relationships with jealous girls. And the girls they sleep with can't compare them with gay guys because they don't sleep with them.
I would've liked the hormone theory angle but it doesn't hold well here, I don't quite understand how a lack of testosterone in the womb makes gays produce more testosterone the rest of their lives. If that were true then the gay-er a guy is prenatally, the more masculine he should be from the time adolescent hits. I've seen really feminine looking gays with really tiny dicks. Doesn't make sense.
I'm not saying the suspicion is baseless, I'm saying it might be possible, it's worth looking into. It should be quite easy to run a statistic formula for correlation based on the gender percentages here and penis size. Maybe our profiles should have a field for penis size (length, girth). Might as well include ethnicity. Run the correlation formula on these factors and we'll get closer to the real picture.
I don't know. A straight friend made this remark before (that gay guys are more hung) but i never took it seriously. I've seen some huge straight guys at the gym. And I've seen small gay guys everywhere.
I don't think there's a practical way of judging from experience because gays tend to have more partners so they're more visible. If a gay guy is hung he'll probably have more opportunities to be seen.
Straight guys will be in steady relationships with jealous girls. And the girls they sleep with can't compare them with gay guys because they don't sleep with them.
I would've liked the hormone theory angle but it doesn't hold well here, I don't quite understand how a lack of testosterone in the womb makes gays produce more testosterone the rest of their lives. If that were true then the gay-er a guy is prenatally, the more masculine he should be from the time adolescent hits. I've seen really feminine looking gays with really tiny dicks. Doesn't make sense.
I'm not saying the suspicion is baseless, I'm saying it might be possible, it's worth looking into. It should be quite easy to run a statistic formula for correlation based on the gender percentages here and penis size. Maybe our profiles should have a field for penis size (length, girth). Might as well include ethnicity. Run the correlation formula on these factors and we'll get closer to the real picture.
No, I've met a couple of gay men who had the 'micro penis' and they were deeply bothered by it.
One man very attracted to me, I saw at Pagan festivals, often nude and his obesity caused his member to be hidden into folds of skin.
The Bell Curve applies here.
The men who are very endowed are not always gay, but may be a little more interested in size. A good number of the members here are more exhibitionistic than most. That doesn't make them gay. Only more open.
One man very attracted to me, I saw at Pagan festivals, often nude and his obesity caused his member to be hidden into folds of skin.
The Bell Curve applies here.
The men who are very endowed are not always gay, but may be a little more interested in size. A good number of the members here are more exhibitionistic than most. That doesn't make them gay. Only more open.
D_Jared Padalicki
Account Disabled
I don't think so, maybe it looks more gay because 'bigger' men more quickly show off on forums like this, and people may think that that is a gay thing
rocketred
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Posts
- 344
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 39
- Points
- 103
- Location
- Greenwich, SE London
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I think that's what I read, but that's not the reason. :wink: There was some genetic link as I remember. The 'gay' gene, which is bookended by the genes for creativity and intelligence (I know, this all sounds specious but suppposedly it's true) was also somehow linked to big dicks. It's all probably ridiculous.
Last edited:
That isn't what you told me last month after our camping trip. Hmph
I feel so used. :wink:
It does if you agree with the scientist quoted at the bottom of a column in the Wall Street Journal a few years ago who said there are many different reasons why someone is gay. What I'm saying is: what if masculine gay men are gay for a different biological reason(s) than feminine gay men? (And I won't tie those to cock size!)
Similar threads
