Do Straight Men Let Another Man Give Them Blowjobs?

[Smaccoms]

Wait, temptotalk and Hatt_101, are you two buddies? You two are on the same page? I'm glad I'm not on that page.

 

[Lord_of_Goon]

I agree with your last message but... I'm sorry I'm not saying how others should define their own sexuality. Never said that. I'm talking about human sexuality in general. If even a few persons dont fit well with the traditional definition or the traditional labels, well I think we should change the label (maybe make it less restrictive) rather than saying the persons are wrong or they are in fact something different than they think about themselves, doing this in order to include them in the traditional labels

Oh no!!! Some ppl don't fit labels. We should change everything to make them feel comfortable then shouldn't we???
I bet u want a participation trophy in sports too bc you tried.

 

[Smaccoms]

Oh no!!! Some ppl don't fit labels. We should change everything to make them feel comfortable then shouldn't we???
I bet u want a participation trophy in sports too bc you tried.

Pretentious and condescending...how delightful.

 

[desilover]

isn't sexually fluid just another way to describe bisexuality after all?

No. well imho, at least. a man who fucks women but from time to time wanks over gay porn isn't bi.

 

[temptotalk]

No. well imho, at least. a man who fucks women but from time to time wanks over gay porn isn't bi.

Ok i really really really....and i mean really...didn't want to make this point because....well because i was hoping that others would have been able to come to this conclusion but...

if a guy wanks over a certain type of porn...could he not be locked up for it? If he should be locked up for it then why?

 

[ronin001]

Just my 2 cents; not aimed at any one.

Pornography generally fills a void, caused by desire; or just being horny. Generally one substitutes the type of porn one wishes was an actuality physical activity. Granted there are many many types of porn in existence, yes some is illegal to view or posses and some is just plain gross.

To some things up wanking to anything once or twice is a hobby, continuous wanking to a certain kind of porn would subconsciously point toward a desire; or want to experience something sexually even if that desire is repressed from the world; or to oneself.

For example, you publicly date or marry size 1, tall model types, but you wank to your private porn stash of natural bodied women some who are a little on the heavy side. You have an attraction to them even if your attraction is publicly repressed. Personally I find nothing wrong with this; but if this is the case one should / should do a little inner reflection.

For A person who over drinks; or does excessive amounts of drugs even if this is a private activity, the first step on the road to recovery is to admit you have an addiction even if only to yourself

 

[Snakebyte]

No. well imho, at least. a man who fucks women but from time to time wanks over gay porn isn't bi.

well if you get aroused by watching gay porn you ain't 100% straight for sure.

 

[Smaccoms]

Just my 2 cents; not aimed at any one.

Pornography generally fills a void, caused by desire; or just being horny. Generally one substitutes the type of porn one wishes was an actuality physical activity. Granted there are many many types of porn in existence, yes some is illegal to view or posses and some is just plain gross.

To some things up wanking to anything once or twice is a hobby, continuous wanking to a certain kind of porn would subconsciously point toward a desire; or want to experience something sexually even if that desire is repressed from the world; or to oneself.

For example, you publicly date or marry size 1, tall model types, but you wank to your private porn stash of natural bodied women some who are a little on the heavy side. You have an attraction to them even if your attraction is publicly repressed. Personally I find nothing wrong with this; but if this is the case one should / should do a little inner reflection.

For A person who over drinks; or does excessive amounts of drugs even if this is a private activity, the first step on the road to recovery is to admit you have an addiction even if only to yourself

It would seem the simple ideas of exploration & discovery are lost on you. You are judgmental and entitled to surmise the reasoning behind why a person would masturbate over specific types of pornography. No one is required to adhere to a definition of your choosing with their sexuality (shocker, I know). It's plainly invalid for you to tell someone else what they are feeling and why they are feeling it. Who are you to them?

There is a difference between expressing an opinion versus claiming that opinion to be a factuality.

As such, it's interesting that you compare an honest exploration of sexuality first to a repressed sense of self, and second to a drug addiction. Perhaps you should psychoanalyze all unconventional behaviors? I'm sure there are plenty of individuals who could benefit from your......keen intuition.

Not to say that pornography addiction doesn't exist, but that's not exactly the explicit topic here.

The truth of the matter is that how any one person journeys through their own sexuality is none of your business, even if that journey doesn't make any sense to you.

 

[mineaminea]

I'm 100% straight, but I let men suck my dick. I suck cock all day long. I ride dick until my hole is filled with cum. I literally smell like cum all day because I never stop fucking men. But that doesn't make me any less straight.

???

 

[Lord_of_Goon]

I'm 100% straight, but I let men suck my dick. I suck cock all day long. I ride dick until my hole is filled with cum. I literally smell like cum all day because I never stop fucking men. But that doesn't make me any less straight.

Lol !!!!

 

[Smaccoms]

I'm 100% straight, but I let men suck my dick. I suck cock all day long. I ride dick until my hole is filled with cum. I literally smell like cum all day because I never stop fucking men. But that doesn't make me any less straight.

Hey, you've no idea what's going through a person's head. You also know nothing of the circumstances that lead a person to think the way they do. Perhaps a man needs to believe he is heterosexual (even if he's not) for personal reasons. He has a right to live his life in whatever way he pleases, does he not?

You don't know what experiences that man has garnered, and you don't know how they contributed to his sexual orientation. You don't know what they value, or what they find most attractive in another person.

Contradictions are the stuff of life...did you not know?

 

[ronin001]

It would seem the simple ideas of exploration & discovery are lost on you. You are judgmental and entitled to surmise the reasoning behind why a person would masturbate over specific types of pornography. No one is required to adhere to a definition of your choosing with their sexuality (shocker, I know). It's plainly invalid for you to tell someone else what they are feeling and why they are feeling it. Who are you to them?

There is a difference between expressing an opinion versus claiming that opinion to be a factuality.

As such, it's interesting that you compare an honest exploration of sexuality first to a repressed sense of self, and second to a drug addiction. Perhaps you should psychoanalyze all unconventional behaviors? I'm sure there are plenty of individuals who could benefit from your......keen intuition.

Not to say that pornography addiction doesn't exist, but that's not exactly the explicit topic here.

The truth of the matter is that how any one person journeys through their own sexuality is none of your business, even if that journey doesn't make any sense to you.

Dear Sir, Though I appreciate your quoting my comment, I must point out that I find he basis of your comments incorrect. Either you did not read it fully or missed something as you went along

I believe my comment read along the lines of watching various types of pornography was ok and fine; have a hobby fine, experiment fine; but if a person continues to find enjoyment and repeatedly finds sexual gratification from a certain kind of Pornography, and should this repeated pattern continue, this goes beyond exploration. This may well reflect an actual repressed sexual truth and not the surface truth we show the world or even believe ourselves.

Jeff Foxworthy, the comedian has a great line about If you ______ _____ Then You May Just Be a Red Neck
If a person gets repeated sexual gratification from an alternate public persona he / she portrays Then You May Just Be Bisexual

I am not knocking anyone, or pointing a finger at anyone. I may not have a PHD or an MD in Psychology / Psychiatry; but the logic behind my statements are far more scientifically based than personal opinion.

 

[Smaccoms]

Dear Sir, Though I appreciate your quoting my comment, I must point out that I find he basis of your comments incorrect. Either you did not read it fully or missed something as you went along

I believe my comment read along the lines of watching various types of pornography was ok and fine; have a hobby fine, experiment fine; but if a person continues to find enjoyment and repeatedly finds sexual gratification from a certain kind of Pornography, and should this repeated pattern continue, this goes beyond exploration. This may well reflect an actual repressed sexual truth and not the surface truth we show the world or even believe ourselves.

Jeff Foxworthy, the comedian has a great line about If you ______ _____ Then You May Just Be a Red Neck
If a person gets repeated sexual gratification from an alternate public persona he / she portrays Then You May Just Be Bisexual

I am not knocking anyone, or pointing a finger at anyone. I may not have a PHD or an MD in Psychology / Psychiatry; but the logic behind my statements are far more scientifically based than personal opinion.

There's nothing wrong with going beyond exploration. A person deserves agency over their sexuality, even if they do "go beyond" exploration without changing their public persona. You act as if that's not okay, as if wanting to know more about a foreign sexuality (past the basics) is somehow evil or not allowed. Are straight men not even allowed to understand gay sex by actually watching it? Must it remain a mystery so that they can "lay claim" to a "gold star" straight identity?

There is more than one way of being heterosexual. You don't get to decide what kind of pornography another person wants to watch, or whether or not it "matches up" with their public orientation.

You're still acting the entitled and judgmental know-it-all. A straight person can most certainly watch gay porn routinely; what's stopping them? If they still feel straight despite the porn, then they are straight. Your opinion doesn't change that unless they actually care about your opinion.

All you are doing is making other straight people feel ashamed if they do watch gay porn routinely. You make it sound as if wanting to watch gay porn routinely is reprehensible if you identify as straight. Again, their sexuality does not belong to you. It is not within your explicit right to diagnose them. Let others journey through their sexuality in their own way. Stop crossing boundaries just because their potentially unconventional perspective makes you feel uncomfortable.

 

[ronin001]

Are you going to get tired of writing the same stuff over and over, it has been months now. Who are you trying to convince ? Have you convinced even one person ? Have you ever even bothered to acknowledge that there may be alternative thinking to yours ? Answer NO .

Today you went from the champion of the fluid oppressed, to the self proclaimed champion of oppressed Straight people as well. The members you are defending can surely reply for themselves, possibly if you had not hijacked each and every posing you did not like and turn it into a me -VS- you confrontation, this stupid thread would have died o by now

You have a well prepared script and you just read it over and over. Anyone who does not agree with you is wrong and an elitist .
I admit when I am wrong,or do not know something You sir to date , are never wrong and apparently all knowing. Omnipotence suits you well.

I am having a flash back to an episode of South park with the PC Principal,

 

[StillSmall]

If there's one thread on this wonderful, engaging, welcoming site that I wish would die and never return...

 

[Lord_of_Goon]

It's strange how many ppl on this site don't understand what language is. It's animalistic grunts and moans put together to form words. These same grunts mean the same words in the language. These words were formed to help get ideas out of your head and into someone else's understanding.
Straight was made to define one certain thing. Bi another. Gay yet another.
You don't get to choose what words mean unless you make up your own language.
that's the whole purpose of language.

 

[Smaccoms]

Are you going to get tired of writing the same stuff over and over, it has been months now. Who are you trying to convince ? Have you convinced even one person ? Have you ever even bothered to acknowledge that there may be alternative thinking to yours ? Answer NO .

Today you went from the champion of the fluid oppressed, to the self proclaimed champion of oppressed Straight people as well. The members you are defending can surely reply for themselves, possibly if you had not hijacked each and every posing you did not like and turn it into a me -VS- you confrontation, this stupid thread would have died o by now

You have a well prepared script and you just read it over and over. Anyone who does not agree with you is wrong and an elitist .
I admit when I am wrong,or do not know something You sir to date , are never wrong and apparently all knowing. Omnipotence suits you well.

I am having a flash back to an episode of South park with the PC Principal,

And why would they come of the closet with you here insisting they don't actually exist, huh? The vitriol present in this thread toward individuals with an unconventional experience of sexuality is mind numbing. I never said anything about oppression either, that's a different topic.

If you're suggesting I am solely responsible for the length of this thread, then I'm laughing. There have been months where I haven't posted anything, yet this thread keeps growing. Are you that afraid of discussing human sexuality? Yes, the same topics are discussed over and over again, but that's part of what it means to explore new territory. You peruse through the evidence over and over again, hoping to find something you missed the last time around.

I do not have a script I follow, I have no idea where you got that idea. I also do not make a habit of accusing absolutely everyone of being an elitist. I save that accusation for you . I have not seen you admit to being wrong to me sir about anything.

This thread exists because people clearly want to study human sexuality more deeply. Why else would the same topics keep being debated? I don't know why everyone insists such a curiosity is somehow "stupid". People want to know what this straight-versus-bi-versus-gay thing means. People want to know what it means to not be gay, straight, or bi. People want human sexuality to be the main topic of discussion. Blaming that curiosity on me because it makes you uncomfortable is pointless.

In the past, I have suggested that we make a forum in the main section dedicated explicitly to sexuality. We would put this thread in it, and watch people create new threads in response. Those repeated topics in this thread could find threads of their own. That way, people can actually talk about sexuality, rather than yell at each other [here] for being curious about it to begin with.

 

[Smaccoms]

@ronin001 Also, I like that clip from South Park you posted.

 

[ronin001]

@ronin001 Also, I like that clip from South Park you posted.

Fist thing we have agreed upon

 

[Hatt_101]

That's the thing this thread want made to discuss human sexuality this specific thread was made to ask straight men a question about something we don't do. The question wasn't asked to people that were exploring their sexuality or people who are unsure of their sexuality. It wasn't even asked of the str8 men (which usually means some what bi) it was clearly written straight men.

And as many straight men have already answered No to this question it should have died a long time ago the only people that revive it are people that would not fall under the catagory of straight. Or people who want to find some way to "get a straight man".

There's nothing wrong with discussing sexuality and there's nothing wrong with people that might want to explore but that's not what this thread was about. It's clearly asking about one specific group of people and that group has answered numerous times yet others won't listen.