Do Straight Men Let Another Man Give Them Blowjobs?

[bloodshot69]

Ah crap. Forget to put that there n't at the end of a word and all hell breaks loose.

For clarification.

{Warning: The ideology expressed in this post shouldn't be taken completely seriously. The author of this post is slightly off his rocker so..wait...he does kind of have a point.}

My mistake. :biggrin1:

Edit: Just to let you know. I really was just joking. Straight, gay, lesbian, bi, and other forms of sexuality exist without a doubt.

Fair enough, sorry for missing the sarcasm! :smile:

 

[Popyuu]

Fair enough, sorry for missing the sarcasm! :smile:

Well it was my mistake first so no harm done. :wink:

 

[deleted15807]

Actually yes it does, what you want to call yourself is besides the point, if you play sexually with other men you're anything BUT straight. Otherwise you're just being delusional.

Says who? You? Who are you? The delusion is yours to know what I am.

I changed my oil today. Am I a mechanic?
I fried an egg today. Am I a chef?
I baked a cake two weeks ago. Am I a baker?
I cleaned made my bed up. Am I a maid?
I wrote a short story once. Am I a writer?

 

[bloodshot69]

Says who? You? Who are you? The delusion is yours to know what I am.

I changed my oil today. Am I a mechanic?
I fried an egg today. Am I a chef?
I baked a cake two weeks ago. Am I a baker?
I cleaned made my bed up. Am I a maid?
I wrote a short story once. Am I a writer?

Says the english language and the dictionary. You're conflating issues that have nothing to do with each other. Straight/heterosexual describes who and what you have sexual relations with. If you participate in same sex sexual relations in any way you're NOT straight, that's the definition of the word. Just because you don't want it to be true doesn't change it. Your examples are all about professional job titles, which has nothing to do with this discussion. This is about respect and being honest about the definition of a word. I for one am tired of this discussion and being disrespected on this site, which is what you're doing when you constantly try to twist what straight means. Get some perspective and imagine if it was ok to harass gay men for their sexuality still. That wouldn't be tolerated for a second around here, and shouldn't be.

 

[deleted15807]

Says the english language and the dictionary.

OK. I'm game. Let's do the dictionary game.

het·er·o·sex·u·al
ˌhedərəˈsekSH(əw)əl/
adjective
1.
(of a person) sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex.

Heterosexual - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

​

Now you tell me where you want to go now. Because it looks to me like you have some explaining to do as that definition says nothing about 'performing' sexually which is the post you said I was wrong.

And my 'examples' as you call them are known as analogies. And they are spot on perfect examples of behaviors and actions that according to you then can be used to define someone using a rather rudimentary methodology perhaps best described as 'you are what you do'.

 

[dude_007]

Short answer...yes.

 

[798686]

Hmm. I wouldn't let someone I'm not attracted to suck me off.

But, I guess when you're young and exceptionally horny, the bar might move a little - in terms of what's exciting, etc.

 

[muscleman1965]

sounds like a neighbor of mine after watching porn and masturbating together then to jacking him off, then oral he loved it and surprisingly enjoyed giving me head. That was over a two year period. Then he got orders and transferred out

 

[bloodshot69]

OK. I'm game. Let's do the dictionary game.

het·er·o·sex·u·al
ˌhedərəˈsekSH(əw)əl/
adjective
1.
(of a person) sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex.

Heterosexual - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

​

Now you tell me where you want to go now. Because it looks to me like you have some explaining to do as that definition says nothing about 'performing' sexually which is the post you said I was wrong.

And my 'examples' as you call them are known as analogies. And they are spot on perfect examples of behaviors and actions that according to you then can be used to define someone using a rather rudimentary methodology perhaps best described as 'you are what you do'.

The definition is there in black and white. People who aren't attracted to the same sex don't engage in same sex sexual activities. Are you really this dense? Do you think up also means down? Does green really mean red? Does short really mean tall? This whole idea that straight/heterosexual has a meaning other than it's literal black and white definition is ridiculous, and has been said by others, offensive to straight men who have to defend it.

EDIT: You also cherry picked definitions, which are still very clear, and very black and white...

"b : of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between individuals of opposite sex"

 

[deleted15807]

The definition is there in black and white. People who aren't attracted to the same sex don't engage in same sex sexual activities.

Ahhh you're mind can only function with 1's and 0's? Either the bit is on or it is off? Is that it? Greys don't exist for you? Which of course doesn't mean grey doesn't exist, it just means you don't have the capability to see it.

The question is do you understand the GIANT hole in your belief. The dictionary says ZERO about actions and behaviors. It says attraction and nothing about behavior and thoughts. You have erroneously turned behavior into orientation. And apparently you're running around from thread to thread doing the same thing. And you're still wrong.

Sexual identity and sexual behavior are closely related to sexual orientation, but they are distinguished, with identity referring to an individual's conception of themselves, behavior referring to actual sexual acts performed by the individual, and sexual orientation referring to romantic or sexual attractions toward the opposite sex, the same sex, both sexes, or having no attractions.

Concepts of Sexuality: Orientation, Identity and Behaviour
​

 

[flyingdog]

I'm surprised at all of the negativity to the question. I am straight and would accept a blow job from another guy, no problem. Better than that I love giving them - I know it may seem gay but I truly have no wish to hold hands, kiss or otherwise interact with a guy but I cannot get enough cock cumming in my mouth

I feel the same way!

 

[Penis Aficionado]

Here's the real issue, as I see it: Whether you want to define a person's sexuality based on their attractions, their behavior or a mix of both, you have no way of knowing what another person's attractions are, and no way of knowing about another person's behavior if he chooses to hide it from you.

A man who chooses to call himelf straight, and yet for whatever reason has same sex attractions and/or experiences, will most likely keep those attractions and experiences to himself.

So what are you left with? You can't really know. So why not just accept that people are what they say they are?

 

[Viper73]

Just to play devil's advocate here, as I see this argument go on-and-on around here and agree that it's pretty frustrating to see how far we've come but have yet to go.

I think the key word that those arguing what straight is conveniently overlook is 'attracted'.

If I'm horny enough and really need to nut I don't need to be attracted to anyone. It can be a gorgeous blond bombshell or some random guy. Point is there isn't an 'attraction' or any feelings whatsoever involved. It's simply a means to an end.... same as jacking it.

Once 'attraction' is off the table there is no bearing whatsoever on what one's sexuality or preference is.

Can a theoretical 'straight' guy engage in a homosexual act? Physically, yes. It's no different that a theoretical 'gay' guy engaging in a straight act. Physically, yes... they can. However, if there isn't an attraction -- in most circumstances -- it doesn't happen.

Just because something doesn't happen -- in most circumstances -- doesn't mean it can't happen in some.

There are gay guys who've had sex (or even married) women. That doesn't make them straight.

For those that want to say then, they're automatically bi... newsflash... if they're not still 'attracted' to women they're really gay.

Personally, I hate these childish labels. We're all people and imperfect.

 

[RSMH]

​

Short answer...yes.

:smile::smile::smile:








​

 

[deleted15807]

So what are you left with? You can't really know. So why not just accept that people are what they say they are?

Because some people just don't have enough 'grey matter' to accept that sexual attraction and sexual behavior are not bonded together like glue. And when you present examples (like sex for money or the other 237 reasons people have sex) that may have little to do with sexual attraction they just can't accept that idea.

 

[Hatt_101]

Attraction and behaviour may not be permamantly bonded but but attracting usually dictates behaviour so when a man tell you he only like women if you expect him to do something with men for what ever reason is completely irrational.

When a person tells you they are straight why would anyone assume he may possibly do any thing with the same sex?

 

[deleted871301]

Oh G_d... this stupid question again.... :wtf1:

 

[chadstallion]

Attraction and behaviour may not be permamantly bonded but but attracting usually dictates behaviour so when a man tell you he only like women if you expect him to do something with men for what ever reason is completely irrational.

When a person tells you they are straight why would anyone assume he may possibly do any thing with the same sex?

because sometimes $20. is $20. and it helps with bills.

 

[BIGBULL29]

because sometimes $20. is $20. and it helps with bills.

And it's not that hard for dude to get hard - for anything. Another dude is just like having sex with yourself - even if it's not your major preference.:biggrin1:

 

[Hatt_101]

because sometimes $20. is $20. and it helps with bills.

$20 won't pay bills. But even if you resort to escorting you don't have to sleep with men why do you assume it would come to that. Just do ugly girls. Or extremely over weight girls.