Do Straight Men Let Another Man Give Them Blowjobs?

[bloodshot69]

Because some people just don't have enough 'grey matter' to accept that sexual attraction and sexual behavior are not bonded together like glue. And when you present examples (like sex for money or the other 237 reasons people have sex) that may have little to do with sexual attraction they just can't accept that idea.

Some people don't seem to get that when someone is ACTUALLY straight, meaning into women only, that we couldn't imagine being in sexual contact with another man for ANY reason. I don't even think I could get it up when another man is in the same room, I can't even articulate what a turn off that is. When will this ridiculous "discussion" stop? No matter how much some of you fantasize that straight is something that's "fluid", it's just not. How would you feel if straight men started trying to define what gay means? Give it up and start showing us the same respect you expect to receive.

 

[Popyuu]

Ok so useless thread is still useless. Gotcha.

 

[AlexDB9]

Oh G_d... this stupid question again.... :wtf1:

How bout "Do gay men secretly hunger for pussy?"

 

[BIGBULL29]

How bout "Do gay men secretly hunger for pussy?"

I'm sure some do as not all have an aversion to female anatomy. If a man sexually enjoys his own body, I doubt he would have an aversion to other male anatomy, especially the finest of cocks and male bodies.

 

[AlexDB9]

I'm sure some do as not all have an aversion to female anatomy. If a man sexually enjoys his own body, I doubt he would have an aversion to other male anatomy, especially the finest of cocks and male bodies.

It's often the ones squealing "ewww, pussy!" who insist straight guys are secretly hungry for cock.

 

[deleted15807]

Some people don't seem to get that when someone is ACTUALLY straight, meaning into women only, that we couldn't imagine being in sexual contact with another man for ANY reason. I don't even think I could get it up when another man is in the same room, I can't even articulate what a turn off that is. When will this ridiculous "discussion" stop? No matter how much some of you fantasize that straight is something that's "fluid", it's just not. How would you feel if straight men started trying to define what gay means? Give it up and start showing us the same respect you expect to receive.

And no matter you and others senseless babbling you do not own or define a person or what is straight and what is gay and what is bi , who is a goat and who is a sheep. The individual has that right. If it doesn't align with your definition too the fuck bad.

Sexuality researchers who know vastly more than you or Mr. Hatt do present their findings they consistently present a more nuanced picture of orientation, attraction and behavior. A nuance that escapes lower information processing ability individuals like yourself.

The person that needs to give it up is you. You have yet to present a link or evidence supporting your definition of orientation equaling behavior. And until you do your ramblings will carry zero weight.

 

[deleted871301]

How bout "Do gay men secretly hunger for pussy?"

Sometimes I do... :wink: (hence the 1%)

How about "Do straight women secretly hunger for pussy?"

 

[twoton]

I'd steal the church poor box for $20 before doing anything with a guy for 100 times that.

 

[AlexDB9]

Sometimes I do... :wink: (hence the 1%)

How about "Do straight women secretly hunger for pussy?"

I've had penis-in-vagina sex a couple thousand times but I don't consider myself 100% gay.

 

[deleted871301]

How bout "Do gay men secretly hunger for pussy?"

I've had penis-in-vagina sex a couple thousand times but I don't consider myself 100% gay.

When i'm hungry for pussy, i'm hungry for pussy only!

When i'm hungry for cock, i'm hungry for everything else that's attached to the cock as well!

Back to the OP's question now.... Answer = NO

 

[Hatt_101]

Hats off (lol ) to Alex and durbanville that show not all non straight men are like the people who posted this question.

 

[bloodshot69]

And no matter you and others senseless babbling you do not own or define a person or what is straight and what is gay and what is bi , who is a goat and who is a sheep. The individual has that right. If it doesn't align with your definition too the fuck bad.

Sexuality researchers who know vastly more than you or Mr. Hatt do present their findings they consistently present a more nuanced picture of orientation, attraction and behavior. A nuance that escapes lower information processing ability individuals like yourself.

The person that needs to give it up is you. You have yet to present a link or evidence supporting your definition of orientation equaling behavior. And until you do your ramblings will carry zero weight.

Are you really serious or you just trolling? Once again, words in the English language, or any language for that matter DO have definitions. Call yourself whatever the hell you want, but don't call something that's not straight, straight. And NO, you don't just get to usurp a word a decide it means something that it doesn't because you're too afraid to admit what you really are, that's not how language or society at large works. It's also just plain offensive and disrespectful after a while.

Heterosexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Heterosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between persons of opposite sex or gender."

heterosexual - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
"A heterosexual person is attracted to people of the opposite sex. Boys who like girls and women who like men are heterosexual."

Heterosexual - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
"1 a : of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward the opposite sex
b : of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between individuals of opposite sex"

heterosexual - definition of heterosexual by The Free Dictionary
"1. Sexually oriented to persons of the opposite sex.
2. Of or relating to different sexes."

Heterosexuality | Define Heterosexuality at Dictionary.com
"sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex."

heterosexual - Wiktionary
"Sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex."

Heterosexual definition - MedicineNet - Health and Medical Information Produced by Doctors
"A person sexually attracted to persons of the opposite sex. Or a person who has sexual relations with the opposite sex. Colloquially known as "straight.""

heterosexual: definition of heterosexual in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)
"(Of a person) sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex."

Are we done yet? I've also never said sexuality is "binary" as you have falsely claimed earlier in this thread. There's thousands of shades of grey, they're called bisexual, pansexual, omnisexual, polysexual, or whatever the hell you want to call them, I really don't care, but they're not straight or gay, which are the absolutes on each end and ARE singular, non fluid, black and white definitions.

 

[bloodshot69]

Hats off (lol ) to Alex and durbanville that show not all non straight men are like the people who posted this question.

Agreed! I've very much like Durbanville's answers in a number of threads. On point and entertaining at the same time!

 

[Silvertip]

... Are we done yet? ...

Not really. Of all the definitions you've quoted from the various dictionaries not a single one rules out the possibility that the "heterosexual" or "straight" person being described can't enjoy the occasional homosexual spree with a member of the same sex.

In my own case, here at LPSG, I've settled on "Unsure" as my sexual orientation because I am unsure what any percentage I might choose will mean to anyone who is viewing that number. I am likewise unsure what the simpleminded orientation labels might mean to any particular individual. Yes, words do have specific meanings but they are all still open to interpretation and different folks have varying views of a word's meaning. Get over it!

You speak of offense and disrespect. Let me tell you that what is really offensive and disrespectful is assigning a simple label to one of the most complex aspects of the human nature, one's sexuality.

You really need to open your mind and get off the Word Nazi bandwagon.

 

[BIGBULL29]

Not really. Of all the definitions you've quoted from the various dictionaries not a single one rules out the possibility that the "heterosexual" or "straight" person being described can't enjoy the occasional homosexual spree with a member of the same sex.

In my own case, here at LPSG, I've settled on "Unsure" as my sexual orientation because I am unsure what any percentage I might choose will mean to anyone who is viewing that number. I am likewise unsure what the simpleminded orientation labels might mean to any particular individual. Yes, words do have specific meanings but they are all still open to interpretation and different folks have varying views of a word's meaning. Get over it!

You speak of offense and disrespect. Let me tell you that what is really offensive and disrespectful is assigning a simple label to one of the most complex aspects of the human nature, one's sexuality.

You really need to open your mind and get off the Word Nazi bandwagon.

At least one persons gets it!:wink::biggrin1:

 

[Grower82]

How bout "Do gay men secretly hunger for pussy?"

Or how about gay men, who father children with two wives successively, hire their Israeli boyfriends for a sensitive state position, come out on national tv, get away with it all, and then go on to serve as Protestant ministers - a la former NJ Gov. Jim McGrevey.

You might make an argument that straight men never breach the lines of their prescribed sexuality - otherwise they are part gay - but obviously gay and bi men have sex, and frequent sex, with women, and obviously get something out of it. I don't think your rhetorical questions serves the purpose at all.

 

[Hatt_101]

the definition also doesnt say that a straight person cant enjoy sex with an animal but we dont think that because we use common sense.

when someone tells you that they are straight do you think to yourself that they will want to have sex with the same gender?

Not really. Of all the definitions you've quoted from the various dictionaries not a single one rules out the possibility that the "heterosexual" or "straight" person being described can't enjoy the occasional homosexual spree with a member of the same sex.

In my own case, here at LPSG, I've settled on "Unsure" as my sexual orientation because I am unsure what any percentage I might choose will mean to anyone who is viewing that number. I am likewise unsure what the simpleminded orientation labels might mean to any particular individual. Yes, words do have specific meanings but they are all still open to interpretation and different folks have varying views of a word's meaning. Get over it!

You speak of offense and disrespect. Let me tell you that what is really offensive and disrespectful is assigning a simple label to one of the most complex aspects of the human nature, one's sexuality.

You really need to open your mind and get off the Word Nazi bandwagon.

 

[798686]

Sometimes I do... :wink: (hence the 1%)

How about "Do straight women secretly hunger for pussy?"

:tongue:

Back to the OP's question now.... Answer = NO

That tends to be my view on the subject.

Hats off (lol ) to Alex and durbanville that show not all non straight men are like the people who posted this question.

Agreed.

 

[deleted15807]

Are we done yet?

You've not done much in terms of basic research have you? A dictionary? Seriously a dictionary? Is that the extent of how you conduct your fact finding? What a wasted effort. Truly a waste.

Pay close attention here. Well as close as an individual with your capabilities can.....

Not really. Of all the definitions you've quoted from the various dictionaries not a single one rules out the possibility that the "heterosexual" or "straight" person being described can't enjoy the occasional homosexual spree with a member of the same sex.

In my own case, here at LPSG, I've settled on "Unsure" as my sexual orientation because I am unsure what any percentage I might choose will mean to anyone who is viewing that number. I am likewise unsure what the simpleminded orientation labels might mean to any particular individual. Yes, words do have specific meanings but they are all still open to interpretation and different folks have varying views of a word's meaning. Get over it!

You speak of offense and disrespect. Let me tell you that what is really offensive and disrespectful is assigning a simple label to one of the most complex aspects of the human nature, one's sexuality.

You really need to open your mind and get off the Word Nazi bandwagon.

Ohh the complexties indeed:

A. Sexual Attraction. To whom are you sexually attracted?
B. Sexual Behaviour. With whom have you had sex?
C. Sexual Fantasies. About whom are your sexual fantasies?
D. Emotional Preference. Who do you feel more drawn to or close to emotionally?
E. Social Preference. Which gender do you socialize with?
F. Lifestyle Preference. In which community do you like to spend your time? In which do you feel most comfortable?
G. Self Identification. How do you label or identify yourself?​

And believe it or not all of the above need not align perfectly straight or gay for the 1/0 crowd.

 

[wrestlecoach]

Since there are one thousand nine hundred fifty nine post on this thread and I am new here and have only skimmed a few dozen of them, I most likely am repeating a previous post. BUT I am heterosexual, been friends with, teammates with and coach hundreds of heterosexual boys/men and I guarantee they everyone jack off as much or more than they have sex, DOES that make them solo sexual (just learned that word from another thread on lpsg) since they jack off more than they get laid?
Most would say it does not, so they are heterosexual, but still jack off, why? ITS a hell of a lot of fun, feels good, provides relief and relaxation, etc, etc.
So, being that most of being heterosexual requires a willing partner of the opposite sex and that is not always readily available, at least no easily readily available, and willing AND being that fun is fun, and a few days is a long time sexually for some (many), if an option for fun presents itself and they partake (even if its only on the receiving end of a blow job), does this change their sexuality?
I don't believe it really does, there is a chance it brings out something in them that tell them they like this different kind of fun more or at least as much as what a chic can do for them, then sexuality might change. But I don't think just because they partake in random fun on a very occasional basis really changes anything except expands the availability of non masturbatory fun they can have.