besides, it's just the old cliché of doing what worked on your ex. but, unlike your ex, i don't have freckles.
You just leave cousin ella lee louise out of this.
besides, it's just the old cliché of doing what worked on your ex. but, unlike your ex, i don't have freckles.
changed your mind on the threesome huh...You just leave cousin ella lee louise out of this.
my genitals are too high brow...........
changed your mind on the threesome huh...
The cervix is also able to produce various and copious amounts of fluid ranging from pasty, sticky, slimey and thick like clear eggwhites, silky and white, off-white.
I can't remember if there were any stats, but the two did not correlate, especially with regard to the genitals responding, but the brain not. The research is being conducted by two eminent female sexologists and they believe that this trait is very important when understanding women's sexuality and sexual fulfillment.
Great answer, dolfette. Succinct and on point.he's saying that things can subconsciously gear us up physically to have sex, even if the thought doesn't consciously turn us on.
eg. in tests women are shown to become aroused physically when they see animals having sex. men do not.
the reason for this response is to avoid injury. if we become physically aroused before sex even crosses our minds then we are less likely to suffer injury through unexpected sex. dry genitals may tear and become infected.
(we may actually get wet if we're grabbed by a rapist. not because we're turned on by some arsehole violating us but because we've evolved a way to minimise the damage. sometimes this response causes guilt in the victims and makes the abusers more able to convince themselves the victim wanted it really.)
he's saying that things can subconsciously gear us up physically to have sex, even if the thought doesn't consciously turn us on.
eg. in tests women are shown to become aroused physically when they see animals having sex. men do not.
the reason for this response is to avoid injury. if we become physically aroused before sex even crosses our minds then we are less likely to suffer injury through unexpected sex. dry genitals may tear and become infected.
(we may actually get wet if we're grabbed by a rapist. not because we're turned on by some arsehole violating us but because we've evolved a way to minimise the damage. sometimes this response causes guilt in the victims and makes the abusers more able to convince themselves the victim wanted it really.)
I have trouble believing that women are walking around getting random lubrication that is coming from the Bartholin's glands, which is always the exact same color, smell, taste and texture like pre-cum. It doesn't change. All the other stuff you might see that comes along with sex that come from that area can be related to so many other factors and aren't consistent.
Think of having precum for no reason at all in math class, just soaking through your pants while you weren't erect. It wouldn't be normal. It probably has nothing to do with a subconscious horniness whatsoever. Which is why it's hard for me to see it happening for those reasons in the female body.
Even if there is a male equivalent or a mammalian equivalent. I just can't find a reason for it with all that I know about the female anatomy and having owned it. I can physically feel my vagina tent when I'm aroused, I can feel those glands on each side of the vaginal entrance swell and push out slimey clear stuff in preparation for sex. I can feel when my clitoris gets erectile. But I've never had that sensation whatsoever unless I was aroused.
Now have I been aroused by something bizarre that I never dreamed I could get aroused from? Yes, it usually requires chain thinking myself from one subject to a next and associating it with that. But a door knob in and of itself isn't going to cause my vagina to lift upwards into my pelvic cavity suddenly and make my clitoris sensitive.
Does that make any sense?