Do you like cut or uncut cocks?
- Thread starter Cochranfan4life
- Start date
Note to moderator-
I think the uncut vs cut debate should be condensed down to one thread, rather than having many multiple split threads. Theres no need to have the same subject and arguments spread around on the forum and coming up over and over and over again.
Obviously everyone is not going to agree and thats the way it is, but it seems to kind of disrupt the rest of the forum as it pops up indirectly to other subject threads, and afterall this forum is supposed to be about large penis support....
With that being said, everyone should have achoice in what happens to them and the number one medical association in the world (american) still does not recommend routine infant circumcision, I would listen to these trained experts before anyone on this forum when it comes to medical advice....
porter
I think the uncut vs cut debate should be condensed down to one thread, rather than having many multiple split threads. Theres no need to have the same subject and arguments spread around on the forum and coming up over and over and over again.
Obviously everyone is not going to agree and thats the way it is, but it seems to kind of disrupt the rest of the forum as it pops up indirectly to other subject threads, and afterall this forum is supposed to be about large penis support....
With that being said, everyone should have achoice in what happens to them and the number one medical association in the world (american) still does not recommend routine infant circumcision, I would listen to these trained experts before anyone on this forum when it comes to medical advice....
porter
This IS all in one thread. what do you mean int is in different threads? That makes no sense.
he means the same subject over and over again. there have been lots of cut and uncuts threads on here. do a search and you will see what he means.
Hi Tanuki. You were made to feel inferior by a bunch of guys who through no fault of their own were made ignorant about their own genital anatomy. That pretty much covers it. Thanks.
what was cochran ?
D_CountdeGrandePinja
Account Disabled
Why change something God made? As my sign on says - I'm uncut, prefer uncut BUT not about to negate cut!
I havn't been with a guy before so I don't really have a preference. As for feeling I'd have to say uncut. I love the feel of my foreskin sliding. I like the look of a cut cock better though.
D_Harry_Krautch
Experimental Member
missbec
Just Browsing
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2006
- Posts
- 224
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 161
- Location
- Australia - WA
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Can't remember if I've ever contributed to the intact vs. cut penis debate before; permit me to state that my foreskin exists as created. While growing up during the 50's & 60's, I always tried to keep my foreskin pulled back in order to appear "normally" as all the other penis's that I observed. It's troubling to realize how self-conscious one can be. Penis size became more interesting to me once a friend had observed that another youth had a large cock. I hadn't noticed the other kid, but I was aware that my cock looked better with my foreskin pulled back because it would naturally plump a bit and become longer. Seems odd to me now that I didn't realize that I had an above average sized organ. All the circumcised cocks were just little nubs with their glans exposed.
Having arrived at the appearance debate: I'm intriged by the beauty of the glans, knob, cock-head, stimulation point, or whatever one calls it. The various sizes, shapes, and state of arousal keeps me looking at the natural wonders. It's a shame that we keep them covered from view. Thus, I must prefer the "cut" look.
Modesty and minimal exposure to pornography kept me from enjoying our wonderful pieces of art. Don't think I ever observed another erect penis until attending X-rated movie theaters in 1971. On the big screen, my date and I could observe erections in action, and those cut cocks with their bulging veins and arteries would excite my own. Appearance comparisons were inevitable.
Personal experience helped me to discover that I could achieve the appearance of cut cocks by wearing cock rings, but I desired to be circumcised like the majority, because I assumed this would be the preference of my female companions. All the extra skin was unattractive in my own eyes, and at age 24 I experienced someone elses erect penis. I was surprised by the firmness of his erection, the feel of the taut skin around his shaft, and the engorged state of its glans. I assumed that my sexual experience could be enhanced via circumcision; plus, I believed circumcision to be a Biblical comandment for justification of the procedure. Alas, conflicting states of bewilderment arise. If ever I found the courage to approach the procedure, I would have to confess my vanity or perverted thoughts to the doctor. I knew enough about the Bible to acknowledge the Old Testament did not justify the procedure, nor necessitate my personal goals.
Many years later, and I still entertain the thoughts of experiencing the potential heightened sensations for personal pleasure for me and my wife. I can only imagine the extra sensations my exposed glans could elicit, the beauty of a tidy scar line, the contrasting coloration on my shaft to my engorged knob, and the opportunities to share my experience with others. Perhaps, more sexual partners would become available. Could these potential dream fulfillments be worth the obvious risky complications or disappointent of lower erotic experiences?
I realize with age that I have more forms of orgasm to experience. In my youth, 3 to 4 daily, orgasmic ejaculations were normal. Today, I'm satisfied via 1 daily, and have found pleasure through edging and developing multiple orgasms through masturbation sessions lasting between 2 and 3 hours in duration. I'm still experiencing new sensations with my foreskin that obviously wouldn't exist if it were to be chopped off.
In conclusion, the circumcised penis is pretty throughout its level of arousal. My penis is a pleasure to observe through its size variations to total erection and is capable of providing multiple forms of sensation with the additional mystique of my foreskin. All penises are truly beautiful when completely engorged.
Having arrived at the appearance debate: I'm intriged by the beauty of the glans, knob, cock-head, stimulation point, or whatever one calls it. The various sizes, shapes, and state of arousal keeps me looking at the natural wonders. It's a shame that we keep them covered from view. Thus, I must prefer the "cut" look.
Modesty and minimal exposure to pornography kept me from enjoying our wonderful pieces of art. Don't think I ever observed another erect penis until attending X-rated movie theaters in 1971. On the big screen, my date and I could observe erections in action, and those cut cocks with their bulging veins and arteries would excite my own. Appearance comparisons were inevitable.
Personal experience helped me to discover that I could achieve the appearance of cut cocks by wearing cock rings, but I desired to be circumcised like the majority, because I assumed this would be the preference of my female companions. All the extra skin was unattractive in my own eyes, and at age 24 I experienced someone elses erect penis. I was surprised by the firmness of his erection, the feel of the taut skin around his shaft, and the engorged state of its glans. I assumed that my sexual experience could be enhanced via circumcision; plus, I believed circumcision to be a Biblical comandment for justification of the procedure. Alas, conflicting states of bewilderment arise. If ever I found the courage to approach the procedure, I would have to confess my vanity or perverted thoughts to the doctor. I knew enough about the Bible to acknowledge the Old Testament did not justify the procedure, nor necessitate my personal goals.
Many years later, and I still entertain the thoughts of experiencing the potential heightened sensations for personal pleasure for me and my wife. I can only imagine the extra sensations my exposed glans could elicit, the beauty of a tidy scar line, the contrasting coloration on my shaft to my engorged knob, and the opportunities to share my experience with others. Perhaps, more sexual partners would become available. Could these potential dream fulfillments be worth the obvious risky complications or disappointent of lower erotic experiences?
I realize with age that I have more forms of orgasm to experience. In my youth, 3 to 4 daily, orgasmic ejaculations were normal. Today, I'm satisfied via 1 daily, and have found pleasure through edging and developing multiple orgasms through masturbation sessions lasting between 2 and 3 hours in duration. I'm still experiencing new sensations with my foreskin that obviously wouldn't exist if it were to be chopped off.
In conclusion, the circumcised penis is pretty throughout its level of arousal. My penis is a pleasure to observe through its size variations to total erection and is capable of providing multiple forms of sensation with the additional mystique of my foreskin. All penises are truly beautiful when completely engorged.
i have had cut and uncut guys and i love boith...i just want a clean dick cut or uncut...
Sherwood, an interesting post to be sure. Keep in mind that your trusty 1 daily is likely possible due to your intact status. I became almost anorgasmic in my mid-thirties, probably due to my very tight U.S. cut. Restoration has been a panacea, but for obvious reasons is not preferable to the penis I was born with.
