Do you like cut or uncut cocks?

[4skinned]

I don't have a preference at all, I think way too much time is spent discussing the pos/neg of cut and uncut willies.

If it's a nice penis attached to a nice guy - hurrah!! Who gives a toss if there's foreskin or not!

The overwhelming majority of women who have experienced cut and normal sex prefer the normal kind:

Male Circumcision and Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner

 

[kingkhan]

I have jerked off with a couple of guys in my life and the one that was uncut was probably the most fun to play with becuase I am cut so its fun to have the feel of foreskin in my hand becuase, its a different feeling from when I jerk off. So, my preference would be uncut but cut is fine too.

 

[boxerbriefs619]

i love uncut cock

 

[B_stanmarsh14]

TBH it would not bother me one way or another if I did not have re-occouring medical issues concering my foreskin, and that is the way it should be.... however noting the aforementioned, I would prefer to be cut myself to rid myself of any re-occouring issues I have experenced the past three years.

As it is, it's swollen up on me this friday and I am off to the VD clinic monday just to make sure I have not got thrush or something (GF is preggers right now), but after all the grief I have had with it over the years, I feel it's time for it to be removed and not put up with the BS from the hospital CUNTsultants.

 

[335575]

I like the look of both and I like my cut cock, but I had no choice in the matter.

 

[Hellboy0]

I prefer uncut and sure the girth is a must lot also.

My preferences: fat and uncut.

Ha! We'd have to fight it out cuz I'm exactly the same!:tongue:

 

[4skinned]

TBH it would not bother me one way or another if I did not have re-occouring medical issues concering my foreskin, and that is the way it should be.... however noting the aforementioned, I would prefer to be cut myself to rid myself of any re-occouring issues I have experenced the past three years.

As it is, it's swollen up on me this friday and I am off to the VD clinic monday just to make sure I have not got thrush or something (GF is preggers right now), but after all the grief I have had with it over the years, I feel it's time for it to be removed and not put up with the BS from the hospital CUNTsultants.

Before going to an american doctor and accepting HIS opinion as to what might be occuring, perhaps you might do a little research to actually find out what is the problem... funny how these "problems" with foreskins do not seem to occur in countries that do not circumcise. Ignorance is a dangerous condition when an american with a foreskin consults with foreskin-ignorant american doctors.

You might want to take your GF with you, as SHE might be the source of your problems.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

I love this question--it is all about brain-washing.. other than american, jews, and muslims who have made the mutilated penis into a fetishist object, the rest of the world does not find a scarred, dried-up, leathery paraody of a penis attractive in any way. Most of the world finds cut penise merely sad and pathetic.

And also love the myths most of the cut fetishists toss out to try to justify their preference...ignorance is bliss.

the myth as you say isn't any worse than what some of you uncuts say. just look at what you said here about the cut cock. pot calling the kettle black here if you ask me. oh im sorry im a women who much prefers a nice smooth cut cock so in your opinion i dont know anything. RIGHT.lol. yes ignorance is bliss and i see it being on your part, theres nothing wrong with an opinion but there is something wrong with being a smart ass in giving it and you have done that here in my opinion.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

The overwhelming majority of women who have experienced cut and normal sex prefer the normal kind:

Male Circumcision and Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner

not this women sorry to disappoint you but cut is better, i have had the lucky opportunity to have it both ways from guys and also some of the guys before and after latter on after they were cut and cut is better to me. the majority dont always mean it is right.

 

[B_stanmarsh14]

I'm in the UK, where it seams very evident from my contact with Urologists in the UK, they hate basicaly anything to do with curcumcision, and believe me I have been through the hoops a few times, to the point @ Nottingham City Hospital, I had to take out legal proceedings due to malpratice over a frenuoplasty. Fortunaly the consultant at Derby City General managed to sort my tags issue which has improved things overall for me, I am still a long way off from being close to 100% with issues, and every time I have asked about curcumcision, they have all dodged and danced around the issue, offering me allsorts of ways to sort this, barring a circ.

I am firm in the belief after over three years of crap with this, that now is the time to concider a circ..... end of it all, if it's not there, it's not going to cause me any grief.

I feel I have been a "Guinipig" for these bastards for far too long now, and now is the time to get things sorted once and for all!!!

Before going to an american doctor and accepting HIS opinion as to what might be occuring, perhaps you might do a little research to actually find out what is the problem... funny how these "problems" with foreskins do not seem to occur in countries that do not circumcise. Ignorance is a dangerous condition when an american with a foreskin consults with foreskin-ignorant american doctors.

You might want to take your GF with you, as SHE might be the source of your problems.

 

[SteveHd]

Before going to an american doctor and accepting HIS opinion as to what might be occuring, perhaps you might do a little research to actually find out what is the problem... funny how these "problems" with foreskins do not seem to occur in countries that do not circumcise. Ignorance is a dangerous condition when an american with a foreskin consults with foreskin-ignorant american doctors.

Stanmarsh is in the U.K. and so he isn't dealing with American doctors. He's written previously [above, and in other threads] about his hassles with the insurance bureaucracy which has be ongoing for a number of years. The real "ignorance" is on your part because you don't know his situation.

He's made his choice; accept it and move on.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

thank you Steve even though we haven't seen eye to eye a lot of times on this subject. i will say i agree with you 100% here on this one, as it was impolite of him to accuse his g/f when he knows nothing about her.

 

[4skinned]

the myth as you say isn't any worse than what some of you uncuts say. just look at what you said here about the cut cock. pot calling the kettle black here if you ask me. oh im sorry im a women who much prefers a nice smooth cut cock so in your opinion i dont know anything. RIGHT.lol. yes ignorance is bliss and i see it being on your part, theres nothing wrong with an opinion but there is something wrong with being a smart ass in giving it and you have done that here in my opinion.[/quote

Sorry, but the FACTS are that a cut penis IS dried out ans more abrasive, causes more friction, and depends on the female to provide all of the moistness--this is NOT opinion. Thre is nothing smooth about a cut penis other than looks--it is, in reality, LESS sexually smooth as there is no lubrication and "gliding action" .
So it seems that it is not MY opinion that is predicated on ignorance, but yours.

Perhaps you might wish to educate yourself on the subject..

Survey Finds Circumcision Contributes to Vaginal Dryness
The impact of male circumcision on vaginal dryness during coitus was investigated. We conducted a survey of 35 female sexual partners aged 18 to 69 years who had experienced sexual intercourse with both circumcised and genitally intact men. Women reported they were significantly more likely to have experienced vaginal dryness during intercourse with circumcised than with genitally intact men.
Bensley, G. and Boyle, G., "Effects of Male Circumcision on Female Arousal and Orgasm," N Z Med J 116 (2003): 595-596.
Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm

Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 12-September-2003, Vol 116 No 1181
Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm
While vaginal dryness is considered an indicator for female sexual arousal disorder,1,2 male circumcision may exacerbate female vaginal dryness during intercourse.3 O’Hara and O’Hara reported that women who had experienced coitus with both intact and circumcised men preferred intact partners by a ratio of 8.6 to one.4 Most women (85.5%) in that survey reported that they were more likely to experience orgasm with a genitally intact partner: ‘They [surveyed women] were also more likely to report that vaginal secretions lessened as coitus progressed with their circumcised partners (16.75, 6.88–40.77).’4
Presence of the movable foreskin makes a difference in foreplay, being more arousing to the female.4 Women reported they were about twice as likely to experience orgasm if the male partner had a foreskin.4 The impact of male circumcision on vaginal dryness during coitus required further investigation.
We conducted a survey of 35 female sexual partners aged 18 to 69 years who had experienced sexual intercourse with both circumcised and genitally intact men.
Participants completed a 35-item sexual awareness survey. Women reported they were significantly more likely to have experienced vaginal dryness during intercourse with circumcised than with genitally intact men ?2 (df = 1, n = 20) = 5.0, p <0.05.5
Women who preferred a circumcised male sexual partner averaged 27.3 years of age (SD = 8.2), while those whose stated preference was for a genitally intact partner had a mean age of 36.4 years (SD = 13.7). Thus, the role of the male foreskin in preventing loss of vaginal lubrication during intercourse may become more discernible with increasing age among women. We reported:
‘During intercourse, the skin of an intact penis slides up and down the shaft, stimulating the glans and the nerves of the inner and outer foreskin. On the outstroke, the glans is partially or completely engulfed by the foreskin with more skin remaining inside the vagina than is the case with the circumcised penis. This ‘valve’ mechanism is thought to retain the natural lubrication provided by the female because the bunched up skin acts to block the lubrication escaping from the vagina, which results in dryness.’5
Our work, which supports the hypothesis of Warren and Bigelow3 and the findings of O’Hara and O’Hara4 about the role of the male prepuce during coitus is fully reported in Denniston et al.5
Research generally has not considered possible adverse effects of male circumcision upon female sexual arousal and response. While Moynihan reported that vibratory thresholds, blood flow and hormone levels were studied,1 there was no mention of circumcision status of the male partner. Likewise, Leiblum failed to control for male circumcision status.2 In light of published findings,4,5 this is a serious methodological omission.
Most likely, reported vaginal dryness and the related clinical designation ‘female arousal disorder’ is but a normal female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically deficient penis.5
It is imperative that future studies of female arousal disorder record and control the circumcision status of male sexual partners.
Gillian A Bensley
Gregory J Boyle Department of Psychology Bond University, QLD, Australia
References:
Moynihan R. The making of a disease: female sexual dysfunction. BMJ 2003;326:45–7.
Leiblum SR. Arousal disorders in women: complaints and complexities. Med J Aust 2003;178:638–40.

Warren J, Bigelow J. The case against circumcision. Br J Sex Med 1994;Sept/Oct:6–8.
O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.
Bensley GA, Boyle GJ. Physical, sexual, and psychological effects of male infant circumcision: an exploratory survey. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Understanding circumcision: a multi-disciplinary approach to a multi-dimensional problem. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001. p. 207–39

 

[4skinned]

I'm in the UK, where it seams very evident from my contact with Urologists in the UK, they hate basicaly anything to do with curcumcision, and believe me I have been through the hoops a few times, to the point @ Nottingham City Hospital, I had to take out legal proceedings due to malpratice over a frenuoplasty. Fortunaly the consultant at Derby City General managed to sort my tags issue which has improved things overall for me, I am still a long way off from being close to 100% with issues, and every time I have asked about curcumcision, they have all dodged and danced around the issue, offering me allsorts of ways to sort this, barring a circ.

I am firm in the belief after over three years of crap with this, that now is the time to concider a circ..... end of it all, if it's not there, it's not going to cause me any grief.

I feel I have been a "Guinipig" for these bastards for far too long now, and now is the time to get things sorted once and for all!!!

Nothing more can be said other than you should do some basic research. if you do, then you will find that most "problems" surrounding the normal penis are due to mistreatment.
Most cases are due to irritation--and most of these are due to using soap inside the foreskin.

I do hope you are aware that you will be losing 3/4 of your sexual sensitivity and sensation--something else to consider.

P.S. a short frenulum can be "cured" by stretching in most cases..something most doctors are ignorant of.. frenuolplasty surgery is not required in most cases.

 

[4skinned]

thank you Steve even though we haven't seen eye to eye a lot of times on this subject. i will say i agree with you 100% here on this one, as it was impolite of him to accuse his g/f when he knows nothing about her.

The point alluded to here is the concept of possible yeast infections. Yeast infection for intact men are more problematic as they show more severe symptoms that do for cut men.

 

[4skinned]

not this women sorry to disappoint you but cut is better, i have had the lucky opportunity to have it both ways from guys and also some of the guys before and after latter on after they were cut and cut is better to me. the majority dont always mean it is right.

The study offered gave specific reasons why most knowing women prefer normal sex--could you offer your reasons for preferring cut penises?

Better yet, the study provided the questions asked, maybe you could truthfully answer the same questions and provide us your answers?

 

[dustin7]

After "hanging out" with a straight guy for some time, I let him do me without a condom. OMG X 100. I did not know that an uncut cock could feel that good. I wish he would last longer but everything must cum at the end.

 

[B_stanmarsh14]

The point alluded to here is the concept of possible yeast infections. Yeast infection for intact men are more problematic as they show more severe symptoms that do for cut men.

Well this is it.... I am going to get myself checked at the VD clinic in Derby as I can get fast and easy access to this, and also if it is a VD infection , it can be sorted quickaly too with meds there and then and will also be able to tell me if the GF needs to be treated too, and with that, she would be able to be treated localy by the famley doctor, and not need to travel in her current state.

However, as I have previousaly explained before, having gone through 3 years worth of being prodded and poked, it's about time I see some end to all of these issues down below, and with this I feel that a circ would be a major (Not the only concideration mind you) treatment option that now needs to be seriousaly concidered.

If it's not there, it will not give me any issues.

P.S. a short frenulum can be "cured" by stretching in most cases..something most doctors are ignorant of.. frenuolplasty surgery is not required in most cases.

Unfortunaly for me, my frenelum had torn (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenulum_breve), which resulted in needing a frenuolplasty to repair tissue damage, but this resulted in a number of skin tags. The problem is, there is now a fair bit of scarring, and the options to sort this are rather limited. It's either go through a number of topical ointments to soften the area (Which I have tried), or a tightening up of the scar tissue area, which there is quite a bit of, and as the area of skin, though scarred, is quite loose, so would benifit with tightening up the tissue, and along with that would hopfuly reduce the amount of scarring there is.

However, another problem is my foreskin is now very loose, so I now have the oppersite problem to what I had previousaly, so now I just want to call it a day on all of this, and just go for a circ like I wanted in the first place, and be done with it all.

 

[4skinned]

"However, another problem is my foreskin is now very loose, so I now have the oppersite problem to what I had previousaly, so now I just want to call it a day on all of this, and just go for a circ like I wanted in the first place, and be done with it all."

Then go for it, it IS your decision, but at least be aware of the downsides..SOME of which I have provided you.

 

[4skinned]

After "hanging out" with a straight guy for some time, I let him do me without a condom. OMG X 100. I did not know that an uncut cock could feel that good. I wish he would last longer but everything must cum at the end.

To paraphrase:

Once you go intact, you never go back! :biggrin1: