Do you prefer Bareback Porn?

[B_Monster]

Your mixing "real life" with "Hollywood". Anyway, I was being facetious.

Hollywood has alot to do with real life man, young people emulate what they see in films and various media, again BB kills in real life and in Hollywood, This is totally on the OPs topic. Im not mixing anything, Im stating facts, real facts. :smile:

 

[invisibleman]

Treasure Island Media and Hot Desert Knights have always been outlets for condomless porn. It's nothing new, at least not for the last 7-10 years now. If you ever patronized them, it was because they deliver the best production values in bb porn.

If you've had a change of heart, stop buying/renting their product.

But any attempt to regulate any porn, straight or gay, in the internet age is essentially futile. Squash it down here and it will only pop up (and with even fewer scruples) in Russia or Latin America.

(INVISIBLEMAN'S ADDENDUM: When I talk of regulating, I do not mean "CENSORSHIP". I mean regulated as in 'heavy and diligent" HIV and STD testing of the performers. AND a preview commercial on HIV risk factors in unprotected sex AND on the box itself. And also remind people that the film is indeed fantasy and is not meant to inspire folks to go out and fuck without condoms. I also believe in heavy compensation of these performers who do bareback after all it is their health. Also, the ability to sue a porn company if a performer gets HIV from a fellow performer from doing the bareback scenes. THAT SORT OF REGULATION. :smile: I AM NOT ABOUT CENSORING ANY CREATIVE WORK.)

My views on this subject have been aired many times before. I advocate HIV+ people serosorting and negotiating their limits. This applies equally in one's private home or on a porn shoot.

Because HIV takes 13 weeks to incubate and can be transmitted at any time during unprotected anal or vaginal sex between serodiscordant partners, there is no such thing as serosorting for negatives. It's a flat-out impossibility to be 100% certain of the negative status of someone with whom you are not in a strict, long-term, monogamous relationship.

I don't demonize HIV+ people for taking whatever risks they choose between each other, butanyone who is HIV negative is responsible for his/her own health: no one else. If that person chooses to take a risk against their future, whether for a few hour's pleasure or for a couple hundred dollars, then he/she's playing a very dangerous game of Russian Roulette and will eventually pay with whatever remains of his/her life.

I totally agree. :smile:

 

[pronatalist]

Of course I'm "straight." How else would one reproduce naturally?

And penises are obviously designed to best fit into vaginas. They are even aligned at just about the same exact angle to mate together.

And...the example of how "Natural" is meaning Straight, meaning Gay being Not Natural.

Your agenda is easily recognizable.

For the rest of it, Unless you were Shoveling that cow and chicken shit, and out there catching bails of hay as they come off the belt.... YOu wouldnt have a clue on what it takes to produce americas food supply, in addition to the worlds supply of food.

I dont care what your "Books" tell you. Unless You've done it, lived by the land, and know exactly what it needs, don't comment
.fftopic:

Biology or nature tells us, that breasts are for feeding babies, and sperm release is for the vagina where it can seek its way to the egg(s).

And why should I be doing the farming work? 2% of the U.S. population feeds 25% of the world. My interest isn't farming, but computers and technology and ideas. What for should I flood the farming market, everybody going back to farming, driving down the farmer's profits? Greater efficiency in farm methods, machines, fuel, helped liberate much of the masses away from farming, and towards filling the cities, and making lots of other nifty products, other than just food.

I would much rather merely smell the wafting, fleeting, pungeant, manure smells, when the wind blows the wrong way, than be out there shoveling it. Besides, I think they usually spray it on, I seem to recall.

Have you done it all, so that you can comment? Didn't think so.

I read some silly newspaper article some years back, something about "growing pains," of some urban yuppies whining about cows behind their back yards. To which I wish I could tell them, the farmers didn't whine while they were having all their babies and populating all the way up to the edge of the farms, so what's all the fuss? Weren't the farms there first? Stupid urban yuppies who know nothing of rural ways.

I've lived in both the countryside and the big city and the small town, and any of them will do. Although I think I like the conveniences of the big city, the most, rather than the excessive commuting of rural life. All of them are natural enough, in their way.

 

[Mem]

You can't spell Bareback without Barack. :biggrin1::wink:

 

[invisibleman]

And penises are obviously designed to best fit into vaginas. They are even aligned at just about the same exact angle to mate together.
(INVISIBLEMAN: I have heard that before. But gay men and lesbians aren't able to subscribe to that, PRONATALIST. While you may be happy populating the world, we have to find same genders to fuck. Maybe your population idea has some merit. You should produce more gay men and lesbians. Otherwise, we would die out.)
My interest isn't farming, but computers and technology and ideas.

Hmmm.

 

[invisibleman]

You can't spell Bareback without Barack. :biggrin1::wink:

Barack Porn sounds interesting. :wink:

 

[bartonside]

Porn movies are fantasies for me and so I'd rather not see a condom.

They may be a fantasy to you but the men performing are real people who are runnig the risk of contracting STDs or worse. There are too many video producers who are persuading (probably with money) young men to do bareback when they may not realise the dire consquences that could result.

 

[Industrialsize]

You can't spell Bareback without Barack. :biggrin1::wink:

What was this post even supposed to mean????

 

[SteveHd]

Hmmm.

Exactly what I thought.

 

[invisibleman]

They may be a fantasy to you but the men performing are real people who are runnig the risk of contracting STDs or worse. There are too many video producers who are persuading (probably with money) young men to do bareback when they may not realise the dire consquences that could result.

I agree. Another reason for heavy regulation of bareback porn.

 

[SteveHd]

Heavy regulation meaning what? Ban it?

 

[invisibleman]

Heavy regulation meaning what? Ban it?

Originally Posted by Bbucko

Treasure Island Media and Hot Desert Knights have always been outlets for condomless porn. It's nothing new, at least not for the last 7-10 years now. If you ever patronized them, it was because they deliver the best production values in bb porn.

If you've had a change of heart, stop buying/renting their product.

But any attempt to regulate any porn, straight or gay, in the internet age is essentially futile. Squash it down here and it will only pop up (and with even fewer scruples) in Russia or Latin America.

(INVISIBLEMAN'S ADDENDUM: When I talk of regulating, I do not mean "CENSORSHIP". I mean regulated as in 'heavy and diligent" HIV and STD testing of the performers. AND a preview commercial on HIV risk factors in unprotected sex AND on the box itself. And also remind people that the film is indeed fantasy and is not meant to inspire folks to go out and fuck without condoms. I also believe in heavy compensation of these performers who do bareback after all it is their health. Also, the ability to sue a porn company if a performer gets HIV from a fellow performer from doing the bareback scenes. THAT SORT OF REGULATION. :smile: I AM NOT ABOUT CENSORING ANY CREATIVE WORK.)

My views on this subject have been aired many times before. I advocate HIV+ people serosorting and negotiating their limits. This applies equally in one's private home or on a porn shoot.

Because HIV takes 13 weeks to incubate and can be transmitted at any time during unprotected anal or vaginal sex between serodiscordant partners, there is no such thing as serosorting for negatives. It's a flat-out impossibility to be 100% certain of the negative status of someone with whom you are not in a strict, long-term, monogamous relationship.

I don't demonize HIV+ people for taking whatever risks they choose between each other, butanyone who is HIV negative is responsible for his/her own health: no one else. If that person chooses to take a risk against their future, whether for a few hour's pleasure or for a couple hundred dollars, then he/she's playing a very dangerous game of Russian Roulette and will eventually pay with whatever remains of his/her life.

 

[dreamer20]

Do you prefer Bareback Porn?
Or do you prefer to see the fucking done with condoms in movies?

I have enjoyed both types of film. I know that the actors have made a conscious decision to either play it safe or not. Most porn that I viewed was of the unprotected sex variety, circa the 70's and 80's. The videos with the condoms were from the late 90's. One porn company had a warning, prior to the film, of the STD dangers of unprotected sex and that not all scenes used that protection. It was responsible of the company to do this, but that part of the video was 1/2 hour long.

But any attempt to regulate any porn, straight or gay, in the internet age is essentially futile. Squash it down here and it will only pop up (and with even fewer scruples) in Russia or Latin America.

(INVISIBLEMAN'S ADDENDUM: When I talk of regulating, I do not mean "CENSORSHIP". I mean regulated as in 'heavy and diligent" HIV and STD testing of the performers. AND a preview commercial on HIV risk factors in unprotected sex AND on the box itself. And also remind people that the film is indeed fantasy and is not meant to inspire folks to go out and fuck without condoms. I also believe in heavy compensation of these performers who do bareback after all it is their health. Also, the ability to sue a porn company if a performer gets HIV from a fellow performer from doing the bareback scenes. THAT SORT OF REGULATION. :smile: I AM NOT ABOUT CENSORING ANY CREATIVE WORK.)

Even with mandatory HIV testing I suspect that the film companies would have the actors sign a disclaimer to protect themselves from being sued if an actor becomes infected.

 

[invisibleman]

I have enjoyed both types of film. I know that the actors have made a conscious decision to either play it safe or not.

One porn company had a warning, prior to the film, of the STD dangers of unprotected sex and that not all scenes used that protection. It was responsible of the company to do this, but that part of the video was 1/2 hour long.

Even with mandatory HIV testing I suspect that the film companies would have the actors sign a disclaimer to protect themselves from being sued if an actor becomes infected.

Well, isn't that a juggle. Hehehe. :smile:

I am going on to things I can control. Have fun but be safe in whatever you do, folks. :smile: You are adults. Do what you want. It doesn't really matter to me.

 

[Rikter8]

Of course I'm "straight." How else would one reproduce naturally?

And penises are obviously designed to best fit into vaginas. They are even aligned at just about the same exact angle to mate together.

Biology or nature tells us, that breasts are for feeding babies, and sperm release is for the vagina where it can seek its way to the egg(s).

And why should I be doing the farming work? 2% of the U.S. population feeds 25% of the world. My interest isn't farming, but computers and technology and ideas. What for should I flood the farming market, everybody going back to farming, driving down the farmer's profits? Greater efficiency in farm methods, machines, fuel, helped liberate much of the masses away from farming, and towards filling the cities, and making lots of other nifty products, other than just food.

Have you done it all, so that you can comment? Didn't think so.
.

1. Take your Homophobic views elsewhere - they arent welcome here.
2. Your a tool in the shed that needs sharpening.
3. You should be farming so you know what its like to work.
4. Yes, I have farmed, and know a whole lot more about it than you.
5. Lets hope your kind doesnt reproduce. Stupidity isn't welcome on this planet.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Bareback? Uh, isn't that really the only real natural sex?



Yes, it is a lot about "fantasy," isn't it. Sex is most erotic, when at least appearing to be natural and reproductive. Thus condoms and porn, are like oil and water, they don't mix, as they contradict. Because so much porn depicts the bizarre and kinky, and not the natural, maybe that's why "amateur" and "educational" are so popular. Rather than "acting," some people may submit their real sexual activities, hopefully with their married mate, and not just a girlfriend. Not so sure that life's most intimate moments should be put on public display as some spectacle, but then that's probably a whole another topic?

It's so much more erotic, when we wonder whether she may have gotten pregnant, right then. That's natural and real, like how sex is supposed to be.

BTW, I hear that porn is a rather dispicable industry, for some of the crazy risk-taking that its natural seems to demand. I just don't agree at all, that it should be so promiscuous, either in story-line, or actual actor relations. Whatever happened to the more virtuous storyline anyway, rather than mindless airhead nonsensical fantasy? Say like they get pregnant, do the right thing and marry, and have still more babies, were they not smart enough to have married first?

Someone ought to smack you upside your head! Sex is terrifying when you think you might have gotten pregnant if you were prepared to have children- even when you are married. Just because you and your spouse get off on the idea of your fertility capabilities doesnt mean that everyone else is going to be. I've been terrified several times in the last 10 years that i might have conceived without intending to. Sex isnt better when you know you arent using birth control. I went through years of infertility and i'll tell you that TRYING to get pregnant was sheer hell during that time. Sex wasnt more enjoyable, we didn't feel all giddy about everytime he came inside of me.

I've been in chemical menopause since i was 23 due to choice of not wanting periods if i dont want any more children. We enjoy sex much much more now that we know we cant get pregnant. The joys of depositing his sperm inside of me with no egg anywhere near them is so much more relaxing for us both.

Who cares if sperm was designed to find an egg to fertilize, they don't have brains or consciousness and all but one dies when fertilization does take place, who cares if they all die off inside the vagina or condom if they don't want a baby? My husbands sperm must be pretty damn disappointed and they're just going to have to get the hell over it because another hot load is going to take their place in a couple of days.

Babies arent easy and babies arent cheap which is why most semi-intelligent people don't go around letting their fertility take over their lives to have as many babies as they could possibly have naturally. It's physically and emotionally taxing on the woman to go through pregnancy, delivery, recovery, breastfeeding and raising each child. Not to mention, making room for them in your home and providing the things necessary for them- even college. If you think for more than 2 seconds beyond your "but its nature" shit and thought about the reality of child rearing you might not look like such a freak.

The sad thing is that i'm going through all your posts and every last one of them preaches a message of "nature" and "natural" even when it comes to how a fucking bulge looks in your pants! Get real dude and take your procreation message somewhere else where you might get somewhere- not on a board of predominantly gay men, single women or women done having kids.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

Stupidity isn't welcome on this planet.

dubious claim at best

 

[invisibleman]

Someone ought to smack you upside your head! Sex is terrifying when you think you might have gotten pregnant if you were prepared to have children- even when you are married. Just because you and your spouse get off on the idea of your fertility capabilities doesnt mean that everyone else is going to be. I've been terrified several times in the last 10 years that i might have conceived without intending to. Sex isnt better when you know you arent using birth control. I went through years of infertility and i'll tell you that TRYING to get pregnant was sheer hell during that time. Sex wasnt more enjoyable, we didn't feel all giddy about everytime he came inside of me.

I've been in chemical menopause since i was 23 due to choice of not wanting periods if i dont want any more children. We enjoy sex much much more now that we know we cant get pregnant. The joys of depositing his sperm inside of me with no egg anywhere near them is so much more relaxing for us both.

Who cares if sperm was designed to find an egg to fertilize, they don't have brains or consciousness and all but one dies when fertilization does take place, who cares if they all die off inside the vagina or condom if they don't want a baby? My husbands sperm must be pretty damn disappointed and they're just going to have to get the hell over it because another hot load is going to take their place in a couple of days.

Babies arent easy and babies arent cheap which is why most semi-intelligent people don't go around letting their fertility take over their lives to have as many babies as they could possibly have naturally. It's physically and emotionally taxing on the woman to go through pregnancy, delivery, recovery, breastfeeding and raising each child. Not to mention, making room for them in your home and providing the things necessary for them- even college. If you think for more than 2 seconds beyond your "but its nature" shit and thought about the reality of child rearing you might not look like such a freak.

The sad thing is that i'm going through all your posts and every last one of them preaches a message of "nature" and "natural" even when it comes to how a fucking bulge looks in your pants! Get real dude and take your procreation message somewhere else where you might get somewhere- not on a board of predominantly gay men, single women or women done having kids.

:rofl: Give 'em hell, Rouge!!! PRONATALIST rents BIG LOVE alot at BLOCKBUSTER it seems.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Pronatalist will always have me running him off in threads. He should have came over in the MayFlower with that kind of shit.

 

[invisibleman]

Pronatalist will always have me running him off in threads. He should have came over in the MayFlower with that kind of shit.

Unfortunately, I have met a Christian guy in Asheville, NC who referred to women as receptacles. (And my first thoughts was: "Oh no-- he din't just say 'receptacles'.) Anyway, this guy has been married five times.