trackjock13
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2016
- Posts
- 2,454
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 30,352
- Points
- 583
- Age
- 26
- Location
- Sacramento
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/index.html
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...ry-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html
No evidence currently, but no investigation that would produce such evidence either. Some experts in the field though are starting to question results though...
"The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.
The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source."
To answer my own question, I personally have no idea, but I consider it in the realm of possibility. I do not see harm in taking a second look at the data / machines by an independent board to make sure the results weren't tampered with (especially considering Clinton's lead of 1.6 million votes nationally).
If Clinton's going to formally ask for a recount in these states, it'd need to happen by the end of this week.
YES, absolutely possible if not PROBABLE. Putin TOTALLY wanted Trump to win, and he'd have the technology and resources available to influence the results selectively.