It's a choice that a person is addicted.
You are wrong on the first statement and correct on the second.i don't think a person can choose what is sexually attractive to them.
IMHO gwr1349 you sir are a moron. First off alcoholism is a disease, secondly no one chooses to be gay anymore than I chose to be straight. :tongue:It's a choice you make just like an alcoholic starts with his first drink. If he didn't drink he would not be an alcoholic.
Why are you straight? Surely you didn't choose to be that. Surely your brain didn't make a decision to lust after girls? Surely your genetic coding has nothing to do with liking pussy.Hey Lex, isn't gay Gene down on 6th, or is it 7th Ave? Don't tell me you met him in San Francisco man, that is just wrong.........
Watch! I have just made a choice to drink another cup of coffee! Damn YOU Maxwell House, you have mutated my genes! (Call the FDA!)
I will also KEEP making the choice to not do guys. Wow, the same choice I made long ago............not hard. I will keep making the choice to bang really hot hookers though..........right up until LE comes and gets me!
(I will bitch to the judge about Hooker Environmental Factors though, you just watch, I will do that too, good enough for you, damn sure is for me)
And the only Gay Genes I ever met was those new Levi's these young dudes wear all the time, makes you think they are into Gay Jeans.
And if you want Science, let's bust off the Natural Selection theory and go a step further with it.
If you don't procreate, you die. Pretty simple concept. In fact, the only Genus to not exhibit that to some degree is: HUMANS
Every OTHER species is self-correcting in that area.
And the only Humans that don't truly advance life by making it is: Gays
Let's go on down the line and do this: In the old days, you were gay, you got killed, some will still happily do so....
Don't forget the sterile and disabled.Is that what you meant by a species self-correcting itself kingdonglingus?
Because there is no procreation those individuals should be killed?
By that same argument The R.C.C.'s priests, monks and nuns should be added to the extermination list.
And if you want Science, let's bust off the Natural Selection theory and go a step further with it.
If you don't procreate, you die. Pretty simple concept. In fact, the only Genus to not exhibit that to some degree is: HUMANS
Every OTHER species is self-correcting in that area.
Let's go on down the line and do this: In the old days, you were gay, you got killed (some will still happily do so).
But if things changed back, and there were tighter societal and cultural rules with less leeway towards aberrant sexual behaviour (like the churches having more power), you would NOT be gay anymore than you would have been Jewish during WW2. But I can guarantee it was a CHOICE you would have died for THEN, not now.
The genetric structure tells who are. There is a difference in this structure between a gay person and straight person. The Alchoholic also has a different gene present. Not to compare being Gay to Alcoholism. Alcoholism is an illness. Being gay is not. So when you say choices a gay person has no choices. If they want to live a true life they are only being who they are and how they were born. Take two men. One alcoholic. One gay. If the one never has a drink and the other never has sex one will be Gay and the other an Alcoholic. Its our genetic make up of who we are when were born and this structure will be the same when we dieIt's a choice you make just like an alcoholic starts with his first drink. If he didn't drink he would not be an alcoholic.
It is not a choice. If it were, many gay youth would not choose it. They would not kill themselves over the rejection of their family and society. The only choice once you are gay is to live a lie or not.
Who would choose it? I like being gay, but if I was str8 I would like being str8.
But then if homosexuality was truely acceptable in the same terms as hetrosexuality was; would that statement be true?
Probably around puberty because I found them more attractive then men. Again, I don't have to proove why I chose women over men since I believe homosexuality is a choice, you have to prove to me that homosexuality isn't a choice, factually.
There is no gay gene. Being gay is a matter of choice.
Well so far there is no proof that you are born gay. So I'm going to personally accept it as a choice.
Probably around puberty because I found them more attractive then men. Again, I don't have to proove why I chose women over men since I believe homosexuality is a choice, you have to prove to me that homosexuality isn't a choice, factually.
Probably around puberty because I found them more attractive then men. Again, I don't have to proove why I chose women over men since I believe homosexuality is a choice, you have to prove to me that homosexuality isn't a choice, factually.