Does A Girls Height Have Any Correlation To Her Vagina Size/Depth

[MatheoBwoy]

for example would a 5ft girl feel a 6 inch cock more than a 5 ft 7 girl?

 

[Serial Kisser]

for example would a 5ft girl feel a 6 inch cock more than a 5 ft 7 girl?

Are you serious?

 

[Magnum10x2]

no

 

[joe bltsflk]

Magic 8-Ball sez: "Very doubtful."

 

[D_Clarice N Flaytable]

for example would a 5ft girl feel a 6 inch cock more than a 5 ft 7 girl?

NOW, Ive heard it all WOW. :sucks:

 

[Big Del]

Just as a tall guy does not always have a larg cock

 

[MatheoBwoy]

Just as a tall guy does not always have a larg cock

but thats an external feature

with a vagina being inside surely there is less room in a shorter girl ?

i'm not talking about tightness, more about the depth

 

[AlteredEgo]

No. Most women have average depth, regardless of height.

 

[Incocknito]

6 inches is 6 inches is 6 inches is...15.24cm

 

[tgirlsrgreat]

hey!!

you know the only thing better than a lady's long legs wrapped around you while you fuck???











short legs trying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:biglaugh:

 

[B_prettyswinggirl]

The vagina is a flexible organ. No, there is no correlation to a woman's height. Any basic women's anatomy book or site could have told you this.

 

[cmore925]

my gf is 5' 2" and she has no problem taking all of me and I am a little over 7".

 

[Enid]

http://www.lpsg.org/189013-on-average-would-a-tiny-2.html#post2828832

The vascular vaginal area is often correlated to the pelvic skeletal size. A short woman can have a very large pelvic inlet and still be able to drop large babies in comparison to a tall woman with a small pelvis.

Height has NOTHING to do with the vagina. Its no different than presuming that taller women will have larger breasts. You could be 6 feet tall and built like a rail, or be 5'0 tall and have DD's naturally. All of the vascularity of that area is not changed because the woman is small.

 

[Nottswanker]

http://www.lpsg.org/189013-on-average-would-a-tiny-2.html#post2828832

This.
Also, I have seen a bunch of Gauge movies.:wink:

 

[BobLeeSwagger]

No, there's no correlation.

You probably could have done a search for this one, as it's been asked many times.

 

[mexdude]

The laws of physics may in teory agree that a lower volume of a living organism is more likely to hold smaller internal organs than a larger organism, but some go to the both sides of the chart, the best thing u can do its to look the average in a chart, but even there u will find much shorter ones and much larger ones

 

[B_quietguy]

This is not always the case. I've fucked tall women who could not take all 8 inches, and I've been with petite women who could.

 

[D_Edwin Eatser]

The smallest woman I've ever fucked was well under 5ft and her cunt was no different from someone over a foot higher. I usually go for petite women and have never noticed any vaginal deficiencies!

 

[TinyPrincess]

In one word: NO!!!!

 

[D_Mona Samore]

I think the quote in enid's post is spot on! I'm 5'1" and I can take a 7.5-8" cock, no prob. Of course I do have a good sized pelvis and gave birth to 8+ lb babies with no problem. And I am a DD cup. HE makes us all different, and there's a cover for every pot!