Does A Girls Height Have Any Correlation To Her Vagina Size/Depth

helgaleena

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Posts
5,475
Media
7
Likes
43
Points
193
Location
Wisconsin USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Female
How many children has she had is more germane than how long her legs are. Also how well-developed her muscles are in the area will affect how tightly she can grip your penis, if she is so moved...
 

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
Fatter(there's no better way of saying it) women are generally meant to have smaller vaginas. That's due to several other organs being squished about. Surprisingly, slim, petite women are often able to easily accommodate more, as has been discussed on other threads on this site.

Any quote by any doctor, medical or advice forum, or service, stating that all vaginas are about the same size, or elastic, however - is complete bollocks (waits for head to be slapped).

To my certain knowledge at the start of the year, the only vaginal lengths measured by bodyscans only involved a maximum of 17-24 participants, all within the same area, & age range.

If anyone on the site can provide any MRI or other bodyscanned scientific research of vaginal length(reposed or otherwise), based on height or weight, or anything, from a decent sample size (several hundred) - I' be grateful, because everything we have seems just to be shit really.

I looked into this a lot 9 months ago - & 24 people doesn't sound like a representative sample to me, especially when current medical advice tries to sound certain on the basis of, well, nothing.

There's a wealth of measured accurate information on dick size - & bugger all on vagina size, length, girth & capacity. Perhaps someone on LPSG could do their PHd on this!

How many children has she had is more germane than how long her legs are. Also how well-developed her muscles are in the area will affect how tightly she can grip your penis, if she is so moved...

Lol. Why wouldn't she? What's the point otherwise?!
 
Last edited:

D_Rosalind Mussell

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Posts
1,312
Media
0
Likes
31
Points
73
As someone who has been on both sides of the weight spectrum, I can assure you that my vagina has not changed due to this. The only thing that's ever made a difference is the kegels I've done for more than half my life. Otherwise, I can take the same size penis as before, even post hysterectomy. We're all born different, just accept it.
 

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,578
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
Fatter(there's no better way of saying it) women are generally meant to have smaller vaginas. That's due to several other organs being squished about. Surprisingly, slim, petite women are often able to easily accommodate more, as has been discussed on other threads on this site.

There are better ways of saying 'fatter'. I wonder if there are better ways of saying dumber too?

Fuller figured women are not generally meant to have smaller vaginas. Anatomy doesn't work that way. Where the hell did you come up with that?
 

petite

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Posts
7,199
Media
2
Likes
146
Points
208
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
As someone who has been on both sides of the weight spectrum, I can assure you that my vagina has not changed due to this. The only thing that's ever made a difference is the kegels I've done for more than half my life. Otherwise, I can take the same size penis as before, even post hysterectomy. We're all born different, just accept it.

I'm not surprised that a hysterectomy didn't affect depth. The cervix is alongside the vagina, not at the end of it. I think the only way the cervix could affect the vagina is if it became tilted very far backwards, towards the rectum.

My pregnancy has changed my vagina. I definitely got more flexible in the entire depth department. Width also hasn't been an issue in many months, but TheBoyfriend has kindly refused to admit that he can tell the difference when it comes to tightness. He is such a gentleman and sensitive towards my feelings, but I know that I haven't felt a stretch in a long time, so he must not either, and there are other little signs. I know I need to work on my kegels after birth.

He has also noticed the depth change with me and he loves it, probably almost as much as I do. I've asked several gynecologists and none could assure me that I would stay like this after I give birth, though. I have my fingers crossed that I will remain deeper than before. We'll see!
 

B_subgirrl

Sexy Member
Joined
May 15, 2010
Posts
5,547
Media
0
Likes
34
Points
73
Location
NSW, Australia
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
As someone who has been on both sides of the weight spectrum, I can assure you that my vagina has not changed due to this. The only thing that's ever made a difference is the kegels I've done for more than half my life. Otherwise, I can take the same size penis as before, even post hysterectomy. We're all born different, just accept it.

I'll second this. I've been 97kg, 57kg and everything in between, and I could take a 10 inch cock at either end of the spectrum. And I'm only 5' tall. I really don't believe height or weight have any correlation with vaginal depth.
 

NePlusUltra

Just Browsing
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Posts
26
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Alabama
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I may have missed this from other discussions, but given what Enid said, has there been any correlation between hip size and vagina size?
 

Phil Ayesho

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Posts
6,189
Media
0
Likes
2,793
Points
333
Location
San Diego
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
um... no.

People come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes, both inside and out.

My first wife was 4'11" her hips appeared fairly narrow with a very short torso... but She could take me from any angle, with any amount of force.

My second wife was 5'11"- there were all kinds of positions that were too painful for her due to impact with the end of her canal or cervix. And only one or two position from which I could pound her hard without it hurting her. This despite her having a very wide pelvis and very long torso.

By the same token, I have also been with small women who could not take a large cock and medium height women who could.

There is no external referent that points to a woman's internal dimensions or configuration.
 

D_Lanksesbye Sleepingrawe

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Posts
112
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
53
My coincidental evidence doesn't agree with the stated facts. My first girlfriend was 5' even and had a short vagina. My second was 5'6" and was of "average" length. My wife is 5'11" and is "very long" according to multiple OB/GYN specialists that assisted with our last pregnancy. If my own experience was all I had to go on, I would definitely believe there was a proportional correllation. All that to say - I don't think the OP was asking a stupid question.
 

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
There are better ways of saying 'fatter'. I wonder if there are better ways of saying dumber too?

Fuller figured women are not generally meant to have smaller vaginas. Anatomy doesn't work that way. Where the hell did you come up with that?

Would fuller figured included morbidly obese?:biggrin1: Stout? Buttressed! Why climb on the euphemism treadmill?

So you've never heard of "Fat vagina"/ soft tissue dystocia? Are there better ways of saying dumber indeed. It's all that fatty tissue, & I guess in certain positions, all those overloaded guts, that leave less room.

Here's an article that sort of looks into it.

Penis size in Asia

I'll caveat all of the above by saying that there's truly bugger all extensive, or even any satisfactory medical research to actually back up any conventionally accepted medical wisdom in this area.

Which was my point to start with.:tongue:

I have my fingers crossed that I will remain deeper than before. We'll see!

I never thought I'd hear that - ever! I expect your reasons are very salacious! I do hope it all goes swimmingly for you.:smile:
 
Last edited:

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,578
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
It's all that fatty tissue, & I guess in certain positions, all those overloaded guts, that leave less room.

You should change your name to crack head. Because you're clearly off your rocker. There's no use in trying to educate you because your brain is already full of so much nonsense, that there is no room left for anything else.
 

B_KendraLesnick831

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Posts
37
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
41
No, most taller people are taller because they simply have longer legs. The torso size isn't usually much different. I'm 6'2-3/4" and I have a maximum pussy depth of around 8-1/2", which is probably similar to a woman of average height.
 

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
You should change your name to crack head. Because you're clearly off your rocker. There's no use in trying to educate you because your brain is already full of so much nonsense, that there is no room left for anything else.

I love the way that you can't cite a single thing to support your views!

Whatever tosh you've been pondering on the basis of boozily chatting to your equally vacant friends, can never substitute an iota of research!:biggrin1:

Did you actually bother looking up the term? Nope. There's a whole world out there - reach out & touch!
 

mexdude

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Posts
450
Media
2
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
Mexico
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No, most taller people are taller because they simply have longer legs. The torso size isn't usually much different. I'm 6'2-3/4"
Mmm, im 5'11, and my cousin is 6'0, and our torsos are larger than other short guys, i can notice it when we sit around other guys, today a female friend of my cousin was shopping, and she talked to us, her torso was much bigger than mine and my cousin, i think it was around your height as well, and yea she was much bigger than us overall
 

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,578
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
I love the way that you can't cite a single thing to support your views!

Whatever tosh you've been pondering on the basis of boozily chatting to your equally vacant friends, can never substitute an iota of research!:biggrin1:

Did you actually bother looking up the term? Nope. There's a whole world out there - reach out & touch!


You're right, because I need to cite a source when regarding my own god damn body. You have no clue who my friends are. Why don't you get off a board talking about a woman's body when you don't own one. Your posts are full of superfluous nonsense.
 

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
You're right, because I need to cite a source when regarding my own god damn body. You have no clue who my friends are. Why don't you get off a board talking about a woman's body when you don't own one. Your posts are full of superfluous nonsense.

Why don't you get off a penis site when you don't own one! MuhuHahaha. I can guess what your friends are like from your own shallow analysis; they too will have opinions drawn from that mighty well of knowledge that is themselves!:biggrin1:

Stop talking like a valley airhead & try to at least relate something factual or documented. Don't have a pop at people who are able to do this.

Your vagina alone is not the basis for a universal belief, & it's not an LPSG issue.:smile: