TexanStar
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
- Posts
- 10,497
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 14,971
- Points
- 183
- Location
- Fort Worth (Texas, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Logical question... one you'll never get an answer to since the elites that control Hillary also have complete control over the media.
The Clintons are EXTREMELY money grubbing and very greedy. ALL liberals forget that Chelsea didn't marry a teacher or a firefighter... she married a hedge fund manager. The Clintons are exceedingly wealthy... maybe even wealthier than "The Donald'.
Whine away. There is only once choice this cycle. A racist "grab her by the pussy" as president isn't good. It's already a devastating blow to the idea of American values and stewardship that it's even close.
If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with.
Picard facepalm image
you can't beat my logic
Whine away. There is only once choice this cycle. A racist "grab her by the pussy" as president isn't good. It's already a devastating blow to the idea of American values and stewardship that it's even close.
If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with.
You're right. I can't beat your logic in a debate about the virtues and vices of Chelsea Clinton because I won't participate in one.
If he's a racist then you're a pedophile. How's that?
Hillary is a serial liar and CRIMINAL. She's been selling out this country for years and you want to put that cunt in office? Only a MORON would vote for her but you're right about one thing, there's clearly only one choice and that choice is TRUMP!
I think his point was that the apple didn't fall far from the tree. Chelsea is a money-loving leech sucking off the public tit just like her parents.
We could just go to a flat sales tax (that everybody pays anonymously at the cash register with every purchase they make), and this whole "loophole" thing goes away.
You complain and complain about the media trying to distract and deflect with accusations about Russia, and here you are dragging candidates' children into your "arguments".
Her choice of husband reflects the family values she was raised under.
She was raised in the family value of "GET THAT MONEY"
It's a legitimate observation and chelsea isn't a fucking CHILD... she is an adult... candidates children? Where do you get off spewing such bullshit? You are acting like (and setting up the linguistic frame) that I am going after a CHILD... you could have used daughter and you even used a PLURAL FORM OF CHILD - CHILDREN to put the linguistic frame in people's minds that I am going after multiple CHILDREN.
Chelsea Clinton is 36 goddamn years old, she hasn't been a child in decades... pathetic attempt... you are really a sad sad individual.
child - a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.
Do you read the shit you type? I know for a fact that you don't.
^--- Does anyone else see this guy, or did I eat some bad Halloween candy?
Goes away = poor and middle class pay more tax than they do currently.