Does anyone actually still believe in God?

GottaBigOne

Cherished Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Posts
1,035
Media
13
Likes
255
Points
303
Age
42
Location
Dallas (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Freddie53@Nov 1 2005, 02:37 PM


Woah. you said evidence that God doesn't exist and you are using a Bible that you don't believe in and there is more than one religion and a peRson can beieve in God and never read the Bible.

The Bible never says how old the earth is.No where does it say that. And the church's pronoucments are not scientifiic evidence. The Catholic Church, the Angican Church and the Methodist Church all accept evolution fact. So well over half the world's Christians belong to a church that believes in God and accepts evolutio as fact.

BUT YOU ARE SKIPPING THE MAIN POINT. You said that there is billion years of evidence that PROVES God does not exist. SCIENCE CAN'T PROVE OR DISPROVE THE EXISTANCE OF GOD. I can't "prove" that God is not here. You can't "prove" he isn't here. You can prove that we humans can't make God do what we want him to that is for sure. If they were so, I woud be winning the 250 million dollar lottery somewhre. Since man can't control the actions of God, then man can't prove he exists.

Fossils don't prove that there is no God. Fossils prove that organisms lived a long time ago and left a record of thier existence. Let's not read something into fossils that is not there.
[post=357354]Quoted post[/post]​
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn't know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
 

panthera

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Posts
141
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Age
65
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
It seems to me a waste of time to even try to discuss such questions as the age of the earth, fossil evidence and so on with christians. their belief is based on a "leap of faith" which grants them the authority to reject any logical argument. Which does, in a way, make sense. Anyone who is prepared to believe such tripe as the existence of a tripartite godhead is certainly able to accept or reject the other nonsense.
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
Originally posted by GottaBigOne+Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GottaBigOne &#064; Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Freddie53@Nov 1 2005, 02:37 PM


Woah. you said evidence that God doesn&#39;t exist and you are using a Bible that you don&#39;t believe in and there is more than one religion and a peRson can beieve in God and never read the Bible.

The Bible never says how old the earth is.No where does it say that. And the church&#39;s pronoucments are not scientifiic evidence.  The Catholic Church, the Angican Church and the Methodist Church all accept evolution fact. So well over half the world&#39;s Christians belong to a church that believes in God and accepts evolutio as fact.

BUT YOU ARE SKIPPING THE MAIN POINT. You said that there is billion years of evidence that PROVES God does not exist. SCIENCE CAN&#39;T PROVE OR DISPROVE THE EXISTANCE OF GOD. I can&#39;t "prove" that God is not here. You can&#39;t "prove" he isn&#39;t here. You can prove that we humans can&#39;t make God do what we want him to that is for sure. If they were so, I woud be winning the 250 million dollar lottery somewhre. Since man can&#39;t control the actions of God, then man can&#39;t prove he exists.

Fossils don&#39;t prove that there is no God. Fossils prove that organisms lived a long time ago and left a record of thier existence. Let&#39;s not read something into fossils that is not there.
[post=357354]Quoted post[/post]​
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]
there are two problems here. One, the last few posts have assumed that if there is a god, then it has to be the Christian one in the Bible. There are other gods and goddesses out there that some people believe really exist.

Secondly, Genesis stories weren&#39;t written to be historical fact, but were myths and legends to make certain points. The point of Genesis is that there was a God before the creation and that there is order in creation which happens to follow the evolutionary order. Those days stand for periods of time and cover millions, billions or who knows how many trillion years.

Yes, I believe that the writers were lead by God to write what they wrote. They werent&#39; given some special power to see things that other people could not see however.

The Noah story is a perfect example. Every ancient culture has a flood story. Noah is mythical. The point of the story is not the flood at all. It is the last statement that God looked down and decided not to ever punish people again with floods. The Israelites were told and many believed that the floods were direct punishment from God for something they did wrong. So the whole big flood story sets in motion a story for all the people to hear and be glued to as the ancient story tellers sat around the camp site And the people needed to remember the story, so it was strung along until the final conclusion that God has decided that floods aren&#39;t the way to punish people. Instead God gives a rainbow.

A beautiful story. But the fundies and literalists destory the real meaning of the story and get caught up in the details earlier in the story and never read the final conclusion that God doesn&#39;t punish people with floods.

Yeah. I know there are some stories about God not being to kind in other stories, but if you keep reading the Bible you see the people come to a better understanding of God that shows a loving and forgiving God, not a wrateful God. That is a progessive revelation and understanding.

In conclusion, many years ago I questioned the fundie Christianity that I had heard from some adults. It is this so called, "mainstream Protestant" understanding of God that kept me in the Christian faith. I couldn&#39;t go to some of the fundie churches. I would just miss church if that was all that was available.

It is a little presumptive of us to believe that we are the first creation in the universe and that with eternity of time before our time and after our time that we right here in the last 10,000 years are the only "civilized" people. There may be space alians or creatures or whatever that far exceed the intelligence of humans here on earth. We don&#39;t know. We haven&#39;t met them. At least I haven&#39;t. Thsoe other galazies out there. What creatures inhabit them?

I realize there are the fundies who believe the Bible as a literal book with no legends, myths, parables and stories. I disagree with them. I consider myself Christian and I realize some of those fundies would say I am going to hell in a handbasket myself because I don&#39;t subscribe to their canon of law.

I believe each person is a priest unto himself. That means each of us have the ability to search for God on his own. It is not my duty to tell anyone else they are wrong. I will explain what I believe.

And many of these discussions have kept me thinking and evaluating my own beliefs. That is good. Everyone should do so. It is good for us to really evaluate what we believe and why and why others believe what they believe and why. It helps us understand ourselves and understand others.
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
Originally posted by panthera@Nov 1 2005, 12:44 PM
The original question, whether anyone still believes in a god or not struck some deep chords in me.
Over the last 5 years I have been systematically persecuted by a group of christians. They have abused every government agency (police, tax authorities, etc.) which are reaquired by law to investigate every claim, however absurd, however anonymous. I have lost every cent I ever earned defending myself in court against allegations which are beneath my contempt; been forced to move 3 times, lost two jobs...was finally granted a new name by a court in order to escape from the persecution.
The reason for all of this? The son of one of these christians fell in love with me (yes, he was of legal age) and I in him. When his mother found out she and her fellow christians began their reign of terror.
I have no idea whether their is a god or not; but their certainly is an evil force in this world, and it is deeply rooted in christianity.
[post=357376]Quoted post[/post]​
As a Christian it really upset me to see what you have been through. The Bible says that there will be false prophets in the church. I know that some very evil people have used the church and have fooled many well meaning people. The evil is in the evil people who are the pretenders at being Christians and the frauds who get in the middle of church. Sadly it happens in every human organization whether it be religious, political, educational or whatever.

I believe there is a God and he really does love you and your boyfriend. If you truly love each other and are faithful to each other, that is a love story. What the Bible condemns is married men having men lovers secretly without the knowledge of their wives. King David had 300 wives and Jonathan a boyhood friend was definitely his boy lover and it says so in the Bible. And there was no condemnation of it because it was in the open and honest. It is even portrayed as a wonderful love story. Honesty and fair relatoinships are the keys here.

I hope at some point you will meat some loving Christians who will love you and your boyfriend as you are and offer their best friendship to you.

And I will strongly condemn the actions of your boyfirend&#39;s mother. She has let hate destroy her and her family. Hatred always destroys. Love builds.

So please accept my offer of friendship to you. I want you to always know there is a Christian somewhere who has personally told you they accept and love you just the way you are and your relationship. May you two have many blessed years together as a couple. I can only speak for myself, but I think if a poll were taken world wide a majority of professing Christians would agree with what I have said.

It is just this fundie group here in America. Oh well. False prophets preaching hatred. In the end, if they keep preaching hatred, it will destory them as well.
 

Freddie53

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Posts
5,842
Media
0
Likes
2,609
Points
333
Location
Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
Gender
Male
Originally posted by GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 04:09 PM
You are right, "Faith" is the refusal to think, and in man, the refusal to think is the refusal to live.
[post=357414]Quoted post[/post]​
I agree with you that blind faith is the refusal to think.

But my faith is a faith that I have experienced and what I believe is what I have spent much time develping. So yes I have thought a lot. And I have lived a lot.

Anyone, religious or non religous, who refuses to think has lost out on a lot of living. They have become robots. People who don&#39;t believe in God are capable of forgetting or never learning how to think as well. That is a shame. I don&#39;t like cults of any kind or fashion for that very reason. People in a cult don&#39;t think.
 

B_DoubleMeatWhopper

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2002
Posts
4,941
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
268
Age
45
Location
Louisiana
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​

So, you are saying that because Genesis contains an allegory of the cosmogeny, God can&#39;t exist? What does the one have to do with the other? Guess what ... I don&#39;t believe that the creation account in Genesis is literal history, but I do believe that God exists&#33; Divine inspiration means only that God inspired the authors, who were human, to describe things in a way that other humans could understand. They understood what allegory was; it was part of their culture. They understood that the point of Genesis 1 and 2 was that God was responsible for the creation. They didn&#39;t see it as His "recipe". If you want to actually follow what Genesis said, Genesis 1 has God creating the beasts before He created man. So who&#39;s to say that dinosaurs were not among the beasts mentioned that pre-dated Man? The Bible is not a history book, and it is not a science book. Looking to the Bible as a guide to historical and scientific facts is like looking to the writings of Dr. Seuss to determine behaviour typical of cats. Dr. Seuss gives us an account of a cat that speaks and wears hats. Just because we know that such a thing is not true doesn&#39;t mean that we refuse to acknowledge that cats actually exist. Not all Christians are fundamentalists; not all Christians are literalists. Your brush is way too wide. Your &#39;evidence&#39; that God doesn&#39;t exist assumes too much about what all Christians think that God is.
 

GottaBigOne

Cherished Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Posts
1,035
Media
13
Likes
255
Points
303
Age
42
Location
Dallas (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I didn&#39;t say that since genesis is inaccurate then god must not exist, I said that it IMPLIES that it was simply made up just like the mythologies of ancient greece. To assume that it was written with the intention of not being taken literally then you are assuming a lot. To people who are ignorant to the actual workings of reality which primitive man was the genesis story would seem like the literal truth, there would be no reason to think that it wasn&#39;t.

Freddie, you said something to effect that yes god was mean to people but if you read more of the binble then one would see that in the end everything is ok. Would you say the same if Hitler gave a child a lollipop after killing over ten million people? Once a genocidal maniac always a genocidal maniac. Giving perks to a select group of "chosen" people does not erase malevolence to all others.

I have never said that no god&#39;s exist. I do believe that the christian god as he is described in the bible, the whole bible can not exist. This also means that the jewish god and the muslim god also can not exist. The gods of ancient greece could exist, I have never really looked into them much. All other gods i would have to learn about in order to be able to decide whether I believe in them or not, until then, I don&#39;t simply because I can not believe in anything I&#39;m not familiar with.

DMW, describe your god to me if you think my brush is too wide and doesn&#39;t accurately depict the true god, then I will decide if it is consistent or not, or worthy of reverence.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
Originally posted by HappyHammer1977@Nov 1 2005, 03:54 AM
Oh yeah, the billions of years of evidence - fossils. The Bible says, well, the Church says, that Earth is only a couple of ten thousand years old&#33; As you say in America; "You do the math&#33;"
[post=357325]Quoted post[/post]​
6009 years and eight days, to be more precise.
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Dr Rock@Nov 2 2005, 12:52 AM
well, most people don&#39;t want to live; it&#39;s too scary. they&#39;re far happier just existing.
[post=357466]Quoted post[/post]​

I want to live&#33;

"My god&#33; This isn&#39;t a parachute, it&#39;s a napsack&#33;"
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
[/quote]
there are two problems here. One, the last few posts have assumed that if there is a god, then it has to be the Christian one in the Bible. There are other gods and goddesses out there that some people believe really exist.

[/quote]

IF there is a god, and there&#39;s only one god, it will be the same god, no matter what you call him/her.

As for multiple gods...well lets not even go there&#33;&#33;
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Freddie53+Nov 2 2005, 01:02 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Freddie53 &#064; Nov 2 2005, 01:02 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Freddie53
@Nov 1 2005, 02:37 PM


Woah. you said evidence that God doesn&#39;t exist and you are using a Bible that you don&#39;t believe in and there is more than one religion and a peRson can beieve in God and never read the Bible.

The Bible never says how old the earth is.No where does it say that. And the church&#39;s pronoucments are not scientifiic evidence.  The Catholic Church, the Angican Church and the Methodist Church all accept evolution fact. So well over half the world&#39;s Christians belong to a church that believes in God and accepts evolutio as fact.

BUT YOU ARE SKIPPING THE MAIN POINT. You said that there is billion years of evidence that PROVES God does not exist. SCIENCE CAN&#39;T PROVE OR DISPROVE THE EXISTANCE OF GOD. I can&#39;t "prove" that God is not here. You can&#39;t "prove" he isn&#39;t here. You can prove that we humans can&#39;t make God do what we want him to that is for sure. If they were so, I woud be winning the 250 million dollar lottery somewhre. Since man can&#39;t control the actions of God, then man can&#39;t prove he exists.

Fossils don&#39;t prove that there is no God. Fossils prove that organisms lived a long time ago and left a record of thier existence. Let&#39;s not read something into fossils that is not there.
[post=357354]Quoted post[/post]​

Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​
there are two problems here. One, the last few posts have assumed that if there is a god, then it has to be the Christian one in the Bible. There are other gods and goddesses out there that some people believe really exist.

Secondly, Genesis stories weren&#39;t written to be historical fact, but were myths and legends to make certain points. The point of Genesis is that there was a God before the creation and that there is order in creation which happens to follow the evolutionary order. Those days stand for periods of time and cover millions, billions or who knows how many trillion years.

Yes, I believe that the writers were lead by God to write what they wrote. They werent&#39; given some special power to see things that other people could not see however.

The Noah story is a perfect example. Every ancient culture has a flood story. Noah is mythical. The point of the story is not the flood at all. It is the last statement that God looked down and decided not to ever punish people again with floods. The Israelites were told and many believed that the floods were direct punishment from God for something they did wrong. So the whole big flood story sets in motion a story for all the people to hear and be glued to as the ancient story tellers sat around the camp site And the people needed to remember the story, so it was strung along until the final conclusion that God has decided that floods aren&#39;t the way to punish people. Instead God gives a rainbow.

A beautiful story. But the fundies and literalists destory the real meaning of the story and get caught up in the details earlier in the story and never read the final conclusion that God doesn&#39;t punish people with floods.

Yeah. I know there are some stories about God not being to kind in other stories, but if you keep reading the Bible you see the people come to a better understanding of God that shows a loving and forgiving God, not a wrateful God. That is a progessive revelation and understanding.

In conclusion, many years ago I questioned the fundie Christianity that I had heard from some adults. It is this so called, "mainstream Protestant" understanding of God that kept me in the Christian faith. I couldn&#39;t go to some of the fundie churches. I would just miss church if that was all that was available.

It is a little presumptive of us to believe that we are the first creation in the universe and that with eternity of time before our time and after our time that we right here in the last 10,000 years are the only "civilized" people. There may be space alians or creatures or whatever that far exceed the intelligence of humans here on earth. We don&#39;t know. We haven&#39;t met them. At least I haven&#39;t. Thsoe other galazies out there. What creatures inhabit them?

I realize there are the fundies who believe the Bible as a literal book with no legends, myths, parables and stories. I disagree with them. I consider myself Christian and I realize some of those fundies would say I am going to hell in a handbasket myself because I don&#39;t subscribe to their canon of law.

I believe each person is a priest unto himself. That means each of us have the ability to search for God on his own. It is not my duty to tell anyone else they are wrong. I will explain what I believe.

And many of these discussions have kept me thinking and evaluating my own beliefs. That is good. Everyone should do so. It is good for us to really evaluate what we believe and why and why others believe what they believe and why. It helps us understand ourselves and understand others.
[post=357470]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]


So are you saying the Bible is wrong? The church is wrong? Heaven forbid&#33; ;)
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Freddie53+Nov 2 2005, 01:24 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Freddie53 &#064; Nov 2 2005, 01:24 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 04:09 PM
You are right, "Faith" is the refusal to think, and in man, the refusal to think is the refusal to live.
[post=357414]Quoted post[/post]​
I agree with you that blind faith is the refusal to think.

But my faith is a faith that I have experienced and what I believe is what I have spent much time develping. So yes I have thought a lot. And I have lived a lot.

Anyone, religious or non religous, who refuses to think has lost out on a lot of living. They have become robots. People who don&#39;t believe in God are capable of forgetting or never learning how to think as well. That is a shame. I don&#39;t like cults of any kind or fashion for that very reason. People in a cult don&#39;t think.
[post=357474]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

But surely Christianity and all it&#39;s guises is the Biggest cult the world has ever seen?&#33;
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Nov 2 2005, 03:50 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DoubleMeatWhopper &#064; Nov 2 2005, 03:50 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​

So, you are saying that because Genesis contains an allegory of the cosmogeny, God can&#39;t exist? What does the one have to do with the other? Guess what ... I don&#39;t believe that the creation account in Genesis is literal history, but I do believe that God exists&#33; Divine inspiration means only that God inspired the authors, who were human, to describe things in a way that other humans could understand. They understood what allegory was; it was part of their culture. They understood that the point of Genesis 1 and 2 was that God was responsible for the creation. They didn&#39;t see it as His "recipe". If you want to actually follow what Genesis said, Genesis 1 has God creating the beasts before He created man. So who&#39;s to say that dinosaurs were not among the beasts mentioned that pre-dated Man? The Bible is not a history book, and it is not a science book. Looking to the Bible as a guide to historical and scientific facts is like looking to the writings of Dr. Seuss to determine behaviour typical of cats. Dr. Seuss gives us an account of a cat that speaks and wears hats. Just because we know that such a thing is not true doesn&#39;t mean that we refuse to acknowledge that cats actually exist. Not all Christians are fundamentalists; not all Christians are literalists. Your brush is way too wide. Your &#39;evidence&#39; that God doesn&#39;t exist assumes too much about what all Christians think that God is.
[post=357512]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]


But the humans who wrote the Bible were the &#39;wise men&#39; of a world that needed leadership. They used religeon as a way of controlling the masses.
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Nov 2 2005, 03:50 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DoubleMeatWhopper &#064; Nov 2 2005, 03:50 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-GottaBigOne@Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​

So, you are saying that because Genesis contains an allegory of the cosmogeny, God can&#39;t exist? What does the one have to do with the other? Guess what ... I don&#39;t believe that the creation account in Genesis is literal history, but I do believe that God exists&#33; Divine inspiration means only that God inspired the authors, who were human, to describe things in a way that other humans could understand. They understood what allegory was; it was part of their culture. They understood that the point of Genesis 1 and 2 was that God was responsible for the creation. They didn&#39;t see it as His "recipe". If you want to actually follow what Genesis said, Genesis 1 has God creating the beasts before He created man. So who&#39;s to say that dinosaurs were not among the beasts mentioned that pre-dated Man? The Bible is not a history book, and it is not a science book. Looking to the Bible as a guide to historical and scientific facts is like looking to the writings of Dr. Seuss to determine behaviour typical of cats. Dr. Seuss gives us an account of a cat that speaks and wears hats. Just because we know that such a thing is not true doesn&#39;t mean that we refuse to acknowledge that cats actually exist. Not all Christians are fundamentalists; not all Christians are literalists. Your brush is way too wide. Your &#39;evidence&#39; that God doesn&#39;t exist assumes too much about what all Christians think that God is.
[post=357512]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]


By the way; in what way do you think people of the time were supposed to to take the Bible and all it&#39;s stories? This was a time when people were not educated. You say that these stories were not supposed to be taken literally. But no one could read, they were told these stories by the followers of those who wrote them. Of course they were taken literally.
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by jonb+Nov 2 2005, 07:54 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jonb &#064; Nov 2 2005, 07:54 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-HappyHammer1977@Nov 1 2005, 03:54 AM
Oh yeah, the billions of years of evidence - fossils. The Bible says, well, the Church says, that Earth is only a couple of ten thousand years old&#33; As you say in America; "You do the math&#33;"
[post=357325]Quoted post[/post]​
6009 years and eight days, to be more precise.
[post=357562]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Crickey&#33; If that&#39;s the figure, then God truly is messing with our heads&#33;&#33;
 

prepstudinsc

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 18, 2004
Posts
17,020
Media
440
Likes
21,625
Points
468
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Originally posted by HappyHammer1977+Nov 2 2005, 05:29 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(HappyHammer1977 &#064; Nov 2 2005, 05:29 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@Nov 2 2005, 03:50 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-GottaBigOne
@Nov 1 2005, 02:03 PM
Fossil evidence contradicts literal interpretation of genesis, and it implies that primitive man made the genesis story up because he didn&#39;t know better. It seems to me that if genesis was divinely inspired it would have included dinosaurs, since god knows everything. It was left out because genesis was written by men who knew nothing about the prehistoric world.
[post=357392]Quoted post[/post]​


So, you are saying that because Genesis contains an allegory of the cosmogeny, God can&#39;t exist? What does the one have to do with the other? Guess what ... I don&#39;t believe that the creation account in Genesis is literal history, but I do believe that God exists&#33; Divine inspiration means only that God inspired the authors, who were human, to describe things in a way that other humans could understand. They understood what allegory was; it was part of their culture. They understood that the point of Genesis 1 and 2 was that God was responsible for the creation. They didn&#39;t see it as His "recipe". If you want to actually follow what Genesis said, Genesis 1 has God creating the beasts before He created man. So who&#39;s to say that dinosaurs were not among the beasts mentioned that pre-dated Man? The Bible is not a history book, and it is not a science book. Looking to the Bible as a guide to historical and scientific facts is like looking to the writings of Dr. Seuss to determine behaviour typical of cats. Dr. Seuss gives us an account of a cat that speaks and wears hats. Just because we know that such a thing is not true doesn&#39;t mean that we refuse to acknowledge that cats actually exist. Not all Christians are fundamentalists; not all Christians are literalists. Your brush is way too wide. Your &#39;evidence&#39; that God doesn&#39;t exist assumes too much about what all Christians think that God is.
[post=357512]Quoted post[/post]​


By the way; in what way do you think people of the time were supposed to to take the Bible and all it&#39;s stories? This was a time when people were not educated. You say that these stories were not supposed to be taken literally. But no one could read, they were told these stories by the followers of those who wrote them. Of course they were taken literally.
[post=357588]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Ancient middle eastern parables and stories were not like ours--the whole way of thinking was and is different than western thought. You&#39;ve got to take that into consideration when you read the Bible. So yes, while there are some things that can be taken literally (the laws), many of the far out stories can not because they were not meant to be. It&#39;s very complicated, but stories like the book of Ruth in the OT or the stories of the things Jesus did can be taken for their face value, but when you get into things like Revelation, or any of Jesus&#39; parables, or any of the prophesies set forth, those have such deeper meanings that they are not meant to be taken at face value but to be thought of as riddles. You have to understand that culture. Many people didn&#39;t read, but they sure could understand storytelling.
That&#39;s why these things were passed down by rabbis.
 

B_HappyHammer1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Posts
785
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Many people didn&#39;t read, but they sure could understand storytelling.
That&#39;s why these things were passed down by rabbis


Correction; nobody read, except those close to the bodies of power. Read into that.
 

panthera

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Posts
141
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Age
65
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
[quote name=&#39;HappyHammer1977&#39; date=&#39;Nov 2 2005, 12:05 PM&#39; post=&#39;236882&#39;]
[/quote]
there are two problems here. One, the last few posts have assumed that if there is a god, then it has to be the Christian one in the Bible. There are other gods and goddesses out there that some people believe really exist.

[/quote]

IF there is a god, and there&#39;s only one god, it will be the same god, no matter what you call him/her.

As for multiple gods...well lets not even go there&#33;&#33;
[/quote]
...back in after a day to cool off. Since I have no evidence of the existence of any god or goddess, it mattereth not to me of which one is spoken. The god of the "book" religions is, however, the most blood-thirsty hatefilled monster in the whole pantheon.
What a pity that humanity has not progressed beyond this sickness. I am forced to live abroad, have a "new" name, it took several hundred thousand dollars and years of fighting to have a court take notice that I had not done the things these monsters accused me of. My visit in the &#39;States in this year was the first time since 1983 that I could legally do so...because I was finally cleared of all accusations. Only thing left to say: We should&#39;a never left the lions out overnight. I said they&#39;d catch their death of cold, I did&#33;