Does anyone wish they WERENT circumsized?

[HJ1958]

Was cut at birth and yes, I had no say in it. There were a lot of things I did not have a say in, that my parents decided. That was their job as parents and I appreciate that they cared enough for me to make these decisions. I hold no grudge against them and don't think I was "wronged" by their decisions.

As far as being cut, I like my cut dick. Never have known any differently and frankly can't imagine what a difference in sensativity I am missing. I have very satisfying orgasms with things the way they are. I truly can't imagine that there would be such a significate difference in sensativity. If there is, I will never know what I am missing.

I know this is always going to be a major debate on this site. I just think everybody is different in their own way and we, as individuals, should not be in a position to judge others.

 

[gymfresh]

Good that you see it that way. But it's far from universally agreed that cutting off part of your penis is just "one if those decisions parents get to make." It's their job to pick a school for you and what to feed you; how much of your sex organs - or ears, or nose - you get to keep is light years out of that realm.

 

[voodoo2]

I wish i was not cut . i feel my dick would be more sensitive

 

[8barblues]

Just seems ironic that many of us get part of our penis cut off.....then spend our adult lives wishing we had more ( size) .... And yes, I wish I had mine back...

 

[eric19831]

I wish I wasn't cut. Never knew just how big a difference there was until I had sex with an uncut guy. I realized how much more sensetive he was down there and saw what I was missing out on.

 

[gymfresh]

It's not just the sensitivity/sensation issue. There are functionality, developmental, blood flow and possible complication issues, not to mention the stress and changes a tender and vulnerable newborn suffers needlessly from surgery - an issue that those who choose penis modification for themselves hardly experience.

I don't really think intact guys are necessarily more sensitive than cut guys. Certainly porn actors of both ilks go at it with equal gusto and drive. Sensitivity - too much or too little - is not holding any of them back. I do believe, however, that there is a sensation difference and neurotransmission difference. Sensitivity seems to be the most popular issue for people to go to, even though they may mean sensation and, frankly, it's only a fraction of the shortcomings from circumcision in my book. Right up there is not wanting your glans permanently denuded, for social and self-esteem reasons (ditto for a scar around the penis) and functionality reasons, like the natural gliding properties of the penile skin and the proper temperature regulation afforded by the warm, vascular foreskin.

I know hundreds of guys who wish they weren't circumcised. Each one takes a different approach to dealing with it, depending on what they know about the penis and what they're willing to do. I used to think circumcision was a fine idea. I learned a lot and now I don't.

 

[SevenV]

I wish I was not cut. For whatever reason post-cut, I developed a decent sized skin bridge that I'm looking into getting removed. I rather have just dealt with what nature blessed me with.

 

[niceone0305]

wish I wasnt cut.but when I was born in the early 50's they cut all boys regardless.

 

[mandoman]

Everday...I wish I was uncut.

I love your icon!!!

 

[chr2]

I would love to see more cases of men having the choice like you did. To me what circumcision boils down to is this: Another person's religion being the basis of modifying my body without my consent, and leaving me with a permanent negative result.

I don't dislike the way my dick looks. I just wasn't given the choice.

In any case, yours looks great!

 

[mandoman]

That's the most disgusting thing I have seen. Why would you let someone shave skin off of your dick? Yuck. There are some studies that suggest if one is CIRCUMCISED:

Reduce the risk of penile cancer.
Reduce the risk of urinary tract infections and consequent renal complications.
Provide greater protection against sexually transmitted diseases.
Eliminate the risk of phimosis.
Reduce the risk of prostate cancer.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Those accusations have no basis whatsoever in medical fact.
They are put forth by circumcision fetishists, such as Waskett and Morris.
37% of the men who get cancer of the penis, get it on their circumcision scar. It is caused by the HPV virus, not the presence or absence of a foreskin. Renal complications are not caused by having a foreskin. If that were true, the incidence of renal complications would be much higher, since the majority of men have their foreskins.
There is no sexually transmitted disease, which uncircumcised men get, and circumcised men do not get. Most studies, including studies done by the US Navy, New Zealand, and Canada show that circumcised and uncircumcised men get the same diseases, at about the same rates.
Calling circumcision a way to eliminate phimosis, is like calling tongue removal a way to prevent bad breath.
Again, it is only Waskett and Morris, members of the fetish groups circlist and the Gilgal Society, who purport that uncircumcised men have a greater incidence of prostate cancer. Think about it for a moment. How could removing an external part, influence the contraction of a disease of an internal organ? Silly, illogical stuff, and pure self-justification, which bears no resemblance to actual evidence in the outside world.

 

[bavmotors1]

Everday...I wish I was uncut.

me too

 

[neintynein]

I rather wish I was intact... but it is what it is.

 

[Westley]

wished i wasnt cut

 

[kalel0201]

Nope. Love being cut.

 

[sexplease]

yes, I would rather not have been circumcised. But since I cannot undo what has been done, I choose not to dwell on it.

 

[dcsurvivor92]

Yes, I would rather be uncut. My dad, and two brothers are uncut. I feel gypped. As a result, I am obsessed with uncut cocks. It is my preference.

 

[Snozzle]

Going on my 9th year being circumcised. Still loving it. I wish i was cut at birth.

Well I wish I'd been born rich, but there are some things you can't change. You could choose to get circumcised and did. Be grateful you had that choice. The circumcised men who wish they weren't (who apparently greatly outnumber you) have no such choice. (Yet your last sentence will be used by people as an excuse to cut babies, with no idea whatsoever what the babies will grow up to want.)

 

[Snozzle]

That's the most disgusting thing I have seen. Why would you let someone shave skin off of your dick? Yuck.

Or a baby's dick. Even more yuck.

There are some studies that suggest if one is CIRCUMCISED:

Reduce the risk of penile cancer.
Reduce the risk of urinary tract infections and consequent renal complications.
Provide greater protection against sexually transmitted diseases.
Eliminate the risk of phimosis.
Reduce the risk of prostate cancer.

Ah yes, "reduces the risk", but from what, to what? By the circumcision advocates' own figures, the UTI reduction is from 1/100 to 1/1000. Yay! a tenfold reduction! (By that thinking, to reduce it from 1/1000 to 1/100,000 would be ten times as good, a 100-fold reduction!)

But in fact, the first case means that 99.1% of circumcisions are wasted, 99% on babies who were never going to get a UTI, and 0.1% on babies who still get UTIs. (The "better" case would waste 99.901% of circumcisions - in other words fuckall difference.) About 3% of girls get UTIs and they're treated with antibiotics, not surgery.

The AAP admits that it's not a foreskin, but an abnormally tight foreskin (phimosis) that is the risk for penile cancer, and that can be treated as it occurs, often without circumcision.

The prostate cancer claim is bogus. In fact, men circumcised after losing their virginity were slightly (but non-significantly) more likely to get prostate cancer than any others, and only by adding them to the never-circumcised could they make those circumcised before sex seem to have (marginally significantly) less prostate cancer. Also, the control group was falsely assumed to be free of prostate cancer just because it hadn't been diagnosed, when some 30% of men are found to have had prostate cancer on autopsy.

 

[BlackSunshineAZ]

Ever heard of SkinMedica? It's a line of skin care/anti-aging products made from harvested foreskins that Oprah Winfrey is frequently endorsing.

WTF?