Does circumcision restrict penis enlargement?

[Drifterwood]

I am uncircumcised, intact. I can have significant variations in the size of my erections. I wonder if this is the same for guys who are cut tight and whether this in turn restricts your ability to permanently increase your size?

 

[Snakebyte]

I am cut, my erection quality varies and circumcision doesn't restrict growth. In fact I got more loose skin by PE.

 

[bigrider]

yea i got more skin from pe also

 

[deleted15807]

Where is the evidence that penis enlargement works on either? Most penis enlargement techniques are a waste of money. No reputable scientific research validates any type of nonsurgical penis enlargement.

 

[Drifterwood]

In fact I got more loose skin by PE.

yea i got more skin from pe also

So what you are saying is that loose skin goes hand in hand with enlargement.

 

[2322]

In answer to Drifter's original question, I don't believe it does. Growing more foreskin is relatively easy however I have been told by board certified urologist that he believes a tight circumcision can restrict erection length.

Where is the evidence that penis enlargement works on either? Most penis enlargement techniques are a waste of money. No reputable scientific research validates any type of nonsurgical penis enlargement.

Again, this is not so. One study has been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal that indicates jelqing works. It is the only study published to date.

 

[Drifterwood]

however I have been told by board certified urologist that he believes a tight circumcision can restrict erection length.



Again, this is not so. One study has been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal that indicates jelqing works. It is the only study published to date.

Isn't the logic then that if your erection is restricted by a drum tight circumcision that you would not be able to benefit from jelquing?

 

[Big Al]

Where is the evidence that penis enlargement works on either? Most penis enlargement techniques are a waste of money. No reputable scientific research validates any type of nonsurgical penis enlargement.

Please read http://www.lpsg.org/101710-non-believers-on-pe-forum.html in its entirety.

 

[Big Al]

Isn't the logic then that if your erection is restricted by a drum tight circumcision that you would not be able to benefit from jelquing?

A botched circumcision can indeed restrict erect length. This condition usually needs surgical correction.

The key is to expand the tissues slightly beyond what they're accustomed to under maximum erection conditions each workout. Over time, these slight expansions add up to significant size gains.

 

[deleted15807]

Please read http://www.lpsg.org/101710-non-believers-on-pe-forum.html in its entirety.

Please direct me to real science not snake oil.

 

[2322]

A botched circumcision can indeed restrict erect length. This condition usually needs surgical correction.

The key is to expand the tissues slightly beyond what they're accustomed to under maximum erection conditions each workout. Over time, these slight expansions add up to significant size gains.

Pretty much what he said. It's easy to grow new skin as the skin is a regenerative organ. You can reduce the tension in a very tight erection by growing more skin to accommodate it.

 

[Big Al]

Please direct me to real science not snake oil.

The articles that you posted are opinions, and the dubious language used by most of the individuals quoted makes that very clear.

Did you read through the recommended thread or are you content in sticking with the opinions of the articles that you posted? There are plenty of real scientific references posted in that thread. Similar articles to the ones you posted are countered there.

How do you account for the gains experienced by some of the members here that didn't pay a dime for any of the courses they're following?

 

[2322]

Please direct me to real science not snake oil.

Problem is we do and then you decide not to believe it. You're not basing your belief in demonstrated evidence but in something else entirely and, when that's the case, no amount of, "real science," will convince you.

 

[deleted15807]

The articles that you posted are opinions, and the dubious language used by most of the individuals quoted makes that very clear.

Did you read through the recommended thread or are you content in sticking with the opinions of the articles that you posted? There are plenty of real scientific references posted in that thread. Similar articles to the ones you posted are countered there.

How do you account for the gains experienced by some of the members here that didn't pay a dime for any of the courses they're following?

Whatever. I think I left my lights on in my car. Have fun.

 

[FuzzyKen]

One of the things we have learned is that any botched surgical experience done on a penis can have effects on erect and sometimes flaccid length. The restriction is caused by scar tissue formation around the circumcisicion scar and the main problem is that scar tissue does not stretch easily.

If one has an unusually tight foreskin there are exercises and a number of other things that can be tried before a scalpel is even discussed.

My big problem with circumcision is that MD's make a great deal of money off of this surgical procedure, and most of what they make is based on outdated information that dates back to two world wars.

Soldiers were required to live in conditions that were primitive at best and personal hygiene was totally ignored. Parasites which lived in water in certain parts of the world and other bacterial invasions took place. Under those specific conditions many military MD's recommended circumcision as not a cure for anything, but instead a way to keep soldiers under horrible conditions from developing infections because of what they were subjected to in combat conditions.

Erection size variations are a normal part of life in a percentage of men. It would take a reproductive specialist and also one familiar with actual urological issues to give a real and honest opinion on this issue. Most however have eyeballs turn bright green and love the chance to make a buck by chopping and will use any excuse to make the buck.

Good Luck,

 

[Principessa]

I am uncircumcised, intact. I can have significant variations in the size of my erections. I wonder if this is the same for guys who are cut tight and whether this in turn restricts your ability to permanently increase your size?

You do not need PE. Good grief if that thing gets any bigger you'll need a butler to carry it for you.

 

[Mr. Snakey]

A botched circumcision can indeed restrict erect length. This condition usually needs surgical correction.

The key is to expand the tissues slightly beyond what they're accustomed to under maximum erection conditions each workout. Over time, these slight expansions add up to significant size gains.

Good post Al. I have been restoring for years and can report significant size gains.

 

[SteveHd]

^ Are your size gains length, girth, or both?

 

[SirConcis]

Circumcision affects only the outer skin which is separate from the penis structure.

A tight circumcision does not afect the penis structure or erectile tissues. But as the penis grows, once the skin has stretched all it could, it will pull the scrotum and some pelvic skin up on shaft because the erection will force it up.

Over time, the skin will stretch so that it is comfortable during the erection. (for instance, if you have an adult tight circ, or of you had a tight circ as baby and your penis grows during puberty).

PE works on both the skin and the penis. But the skin will respond to the stretching stimuli much more than the penis, so in essence, PE is a bit like foreskin restoration.

 

[Hellboy0]

Circumcision affects only the outer skin which is separate from the penis structure.

A tight circumcision does not afect the penis structure or erectile tissues. But as the penis grows, once the skin has stretched all it could, it will pull the scrotum and some pelvic skin up on shaft because the erection will force it up.

Over time, the skin will stretch so that it is comfortable during the erection. (for instance, if you have an adult tight circ, or of you had a tight circ as baby and your penis grows during puberty).

PE works on both the skin and the penis. But the skin will respond to the stretching stimuli much more than the penis, so in essence, PE is a bit like foreskin restoration.

The only way a very tightly cut circumcision will stretch the skin enough to be comfortable is if you a) restore or do PE exercises or b) have a permanent erection so that the skin has a reason to stretch and grow. Since we don't normally run around with raging hardons (except for during high school and summer at the beach!).

I know this from experience. Mine was extremely tightly cut, to the point that I regularly got blisters and 'rubbing burns' from wanking or fucking...and hardons weren't all that comfortable. Now that I've been restoring for almost a year, got a teeny bit more skin which helps my balls hang lower and my dick seems to be a bit longer since it's not pressing against such a tight restriction. This might be bullshit observation, and I'm not talking about 2-4 inches of new length but it does appear and feel longer though not fatter. Which is probably a good thing.