Does Foreskin visually add alot?

D_Malcolm_MacPudd

Account Disabled
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Posts
2,214
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
73
an uncut 6" generally looks bigger than an 8" cut penis to me. i am circumcised btw but i think foreskin gives it that "monster" quality in photos. rarely do you see a circumcised horsecock. Criss strokes is probably the only impressive circumcised porn star followed by Scott Nails. i really cant think of anyone else who is circumcised in porn that I would deem "huge". But i can think of a few average uncut porn stars deemed "huge". think about how many times you saw a picture of a close to average uncut cock and people saying "wow what is that 12 inches"? i think foreskin can deceive the untrained eye. am i wrong about this?
 
Last edited:

malito

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Posts
1,678
Media
0
Likes
220
Points
283
Age
74
Location
Victoria (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't know about the bigger smaller thing, but I think a natural cock is more appealing than a cut. I'm cut, at 14, and totally wish I still had my skin. Foreskin has this "sip here" appeal. Uncut cocks make me want to drop to my knees and devour the whole cock.
 

Uncutsouthernboy

Superior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
1,691
Media
7
Likes
6,558
Points
418
Location
Georgia
Gender
Male
Yes, an uncut cock looks bigger than its equal in size cut counterpart. IT is an optical illusion. Draw 2 equally sized rectangles side by side. Bisect one of the rectangles with a line drawn 3/4 from one end. The unbisected figure will look longer. The flow of the lines of the other is interupted by the bisecting line. It caused the eye to stop at the line, cut that figure off and start again at the remainder essentially seeing 2 small figures instead of one larger figure.
 

miamirt

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Posts
2,139
Media
22
Likes
5,542
Points
468
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Yes, an uncut cock looks bigger than its equal in size cut counterpart. IT is an optical illusion. Draw 2 equally sized rectangles side by side. Bisect one of the rectangles with a line drawn 3/4 from one end. The unbisected figure will look longer. The flow of the lines of the other is interupted by the bisecting line. It caused the eye to stop at the line, cut that figure off and start again at the remainder essentially seeing 2 small figures instead of one larger figure.

Agree 100% (or is that 75%+25%??).
One uninterupted tube looks larger than a shorter tube with an end cap.
It also appears thicker (because it is at the end w/ the foreskin covering the head)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncutsouthernboy

cliftoncock

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Posts
577
Media
0
Likes
80
Points
63
Location
uk
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't know really. I'm uncut and have a large overhang (about 1.5") and i've never really thought about it. But then I'm in europe (UK) where it isn't really an issue.

Guys have commented but not much... almost everyone is uncut here... you've got a got a cock, so you've got a foreskin... so what?
 

D_Malcolm_MacPudd

Account Disabled
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Posts
2,214
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
73
well take John Holmes for example-he was advertised as 12 inches and yet no one ever disputed and said no way. of course those of us with 8-9 inches ourselves know the deal. But if you notice his semi erect uncut cock looked way more impressive than his erection because when the head is covered, you dont know where it ends, you just estimate where you think it might-hence the deception. without the head showing it gives the impression of more shaft(which technically is true but not 12 inches)
 

nicecircjob

Cherished Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2008
Posts
1,007
Media
0
Likes
272
Points
148
Location
Dallas Texas
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I think a cut cock looks much better than an uncut one. I don't see how an uncut looks bigger. I think overhang of a foreskin looks gross. I like to see the bared head, especially like to see the corona. I like the circ scar too.
 

D_Malcolm_MacPudd

Account Disabled
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Posts
2,214
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
73

Ronald75

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Posts
300
Media
3
Likes
79
Points
63
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
an uncut 6" generally looks bigger than an 8" cut penis to me. i am circumcised btw but i think foreskin gives it that "monster" quality in photos. rarely do you see a circumcised horsecock. Criss strokes is probably the only impressive circumcised porn star followed by Scott Nails. i really cant think of anyone else who is circumcised in porn that I would deem "huge". But i can think of a few average uncut porn stars deemed "huge". think about how many times you saw a picture of a close to average uncut cock and people saying "wow what is that 12 inches"? i think foreskin can deceive the untrained eye. am i wrong about this?

Foreskin adds bulk and girth that are missing in the circumcised penis.
 

Ronald75

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Posts
300
Media
3
Likes
79
Points
63
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't think an UNCUT cock is going to make it look that much bigger overall (maybe just a bit). Also, I think a cut cock is generally more visually appealing.

I think the scar, the change in color, and the general appearance of mutilation are appalling, not appealing.