Does hollywood try too hard to include lgbt in their movies?

huguest

Cherished Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
576
Media
0
Likes
290
Points
208
Location
Montreal (Quebec, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I just finish with my kid "Lightyear", The captain of Buzz is an Afro-American, lesbian married to a lesbian Spaniard with adopted black kid.
View attachment 75887751

Nothing wrong with that, but it's the only relation in the movie, those it have to be the representation of the less then 1% of the population?

I challenge you to find a movie or a tv series where there is no lgbt representation. It's not a novelty anymore, I feel hoolywood is trying too hard.

My question, how those this representation affect you?
 
Nothing wrong with that, but it's the only relation in the movie, those it have to be the representation of the less then 1% of the population?
Really nothing wrong with that? Then why the thread??? :confounded:

And you need to check your stats.

I can assure you that there are a lot more than 1% of folks who do not identify as 100% straight. Way more.

And...many who do identify as 100% straight may identify that way, but their actions reveal they are anything but.

What about those on the "down low"? ;)
 
Honestly, there were multiple centuries of being forced to live in the shadows, underground, under threat of criminalisation and with no positive representation. There is and always has been huge amounts of representation for cis straight people. A little bit of a counterswing in media representation is the least that could be done.

Trust me, growing up seeing nobody like you being represented adds to the extremely isolating feel of the closet. I speak from experience on that one. If LGBT youth see positive portrayals of themselves on TV, it gives them hope for the future. The importance of that can't be understated, especially when you factor in suicide rates LGBT representation.

The question came off as pretty privilege blind.
 
Really nothing wrong with that? Then why the thread??? :confounded:

And you need to check your stats.

I can assure you that there are a lot more than 1% of folks who do not identify as 100% straight. Way more.

And...many who do identify as 100% straight may identify that way, but their actions reveal they are anything but.

What about those on the "down low"? ;)
This is the part where I need to defend myself so people can express here.

You did fall for the obvious trap. And my stats represent who I am.

I'm really trying to start a discussion here with a open question and I'm well aware that there is a lot of Lgbt here.

Google say that 1.2 to 6.8% of the population is lgbt, and I know that a lot of people identify as in between. I said less then 1% because Disney choose to show a lesbian relation + different ethnic + adopted kid in one package. It's the full spectrum of lgbt in one couple. That is less then 1% of the population.

Disney did this with a intent. Because it doesn't bring nothing to the story. What is the intent? Why put lgbt everywhere for no reason? publicity? politically correct? give a voice to the minority?

Are they trying to seduce the 1.2 to 6.8% of the population?
Are there Cota to have minority representation?
Is there so much minority trying to take the spot that we have no choice to put them everywhere?
Are you ok with hollywood cota?
it's fine/too much/need more?

I love will & grace because lgbt is the main protagonist it's all about being a lgbt. But now it's only to fulfil Cota.

Ok, if the subject is too sensible, let's replace lgbt with an environmentalist "save to planet !" on every tv show. Would it be ok to you? I'm all for saving the planet, but I don't need to see an environmentalist on all my tv show?!

But in the end, to see lgbt on every movie/tv show it's not for me a strait guy it's for you the community of lgbt Or is it?

So my question, how this affect you? it's an open question.
 
Honestly, there were multiple centuries of being forced to live in the shadows, underground, under threat of criminalisation and with no positive representation. There is and always has been huge amounts of representation for cis straight people. A little bit of a counterswing in media representation is the least that could be done.

Trust me, growing up seeing nobody like you being represented adds to the extremely isolating feel of the closet. I speak from experience on that one. If LGBT youth see positive portrayals of themselves on TV, it gives them hope for the future. The importance of that can't be understated, especially when you factor in suicide rates LGBT representation.

The question came off as pretty privilege blind.
Maybe your right, I'm blind to your situation. How old are you?
Do you think the young lgbt, live in the shadows?

I'm sure everyone need a positive portrayals of themselves on TV. So every Tv show should have 1 black, 1 lesbian, 1 trans, 1 Italian, 1 French, 1 Russian, 1 handicap, 1 nerd, 1 robot....

You get the point, So, where Hollywood stops?
Does it need to be on every show for no reason?
Maybe someday we will have cota for men with LPSG on every ty show.

I understand that visibility it's a big part to a community, lgbt need support and understanding and I salute movies and tv show that want to bring that on TV.

We are at a point where it's for no reason, Just plug a lgbt in the story.
 
I just finish with my kid "Lightyear", The captain of Buzz is an Afro-American, lesbian married to a lesbian Spaniard with adopted black kid.

Nothing wrong with that, but it's the only relation in the movie, those it have to be the representation of the less then 1% of the population?

About 100 years of cinema with almost 0 lgbt characters. gotta make up for lost time! + GenZ is far more comfortable with these themes, and a lot of the films/tv with a lot of gay characters are teen/college stuff

Funny thing i heard lately was someone asking about whether Sandman (Netflix) seemed like it had too many superfluous gay characters that added to story... Um that is part of hte comic it is based on!

If you want boring old school straight stuff watch scripted network shows like CSI or whatever lol (maybe it is full of gays now, dunno dont watch)
 
Google say that 1.2 to 6.8% of the population is lgbt
~20% Gen Z identify LGBT - even if they dont continue to identify in that way in 5 years it signals at least curiosity and thus gay aracters would interest them
~10% Millenials
https_3A_2F_2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_2Fpublic_2Fimag...jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: huguest and MisterB
I just finish with my kid "Lightyear", The captain of Buzz is an Afro-American, lesbian married to a lesbian Spaniard with adopted black kid.
View attachment 75887751

Nothing wrong with that, but it's the only relation in the movie, those it have to be the representation of the less then 1% of the population?

I challenge you to find a movie or a tv series where there is no lgbt representation. It's not a novelty anymore, I feel hoolywood is trying too hard.

My question, how those this representation affect you?
Kid wasnt adopted, Buzz's partner was clearly pregnant during the 1st parts of the short montages that illustrated her life's journey in the wake of Buzz's time jumps. I'd argue it represents maybe 1% of the movie, as even the kid she ends up having grows up to be in a heterosexual relationship that bears the granddaughter.
The vast majority of this movie was the tried and true Hollywood formula: white man thinks he knows better than all those around him, and despite having to learn some lessons along the way is ultimately proven right, or rewarded for his actions.
Anybody who thinks some LGBT agenda was even a major plot point in this movie was either fishing hard too be mad or is secretly butthurt that Chris Evans replaced the cocaine snitch as the voice of the main character.
 
About 100 years of cinema with almost 0 lgbt characters. gotta make up for lost time! + GenZ is far more comfortable with these themes, and a lot of the films/tv with a lot of gay characters are teen/college stuff

Funny thing i heard lately was someone asking about whether Sandman (Netflix) seemed like it had too many superfluous gay characters that added to story... Um that is part of hte comic it is based on!

If you want boring old school straight stuff watch scripted network shows like CSI or whatever lol (maybe it is full of gays now, dunno dont watch)
Thanks for your comment, good point.
 
~20% Gen Z identify LGBT - even if they dont continue to identify in that way in 5 years it signals at least curiosity and thus gay aracters would interest them
~10% Millenials
View attachment 75952371

Kid wasnt adopted, Buzz's partner was clearly pregnant during the 1st parts of the short montages that illustrated her life's journey in the wake of Buzz's time jumps. I'd argue it represents maybe 1% of the movie, as even the kid she ends up having grows up to be in a heterosexual relationship that bears the granddaughter.
The vast majority of this movie was the tried and true Hollywood formula: white man thinks he knows better than all those around him, and despite having to learn some lessons along the way is ultimately proven right, or rewarded for his actions.
Anybody who thinks some LGBT agenda was even a major plot point in this movie was either fishing hard too be mad or is secretly butthurt that Chris Evans replaced the cocaine snitch as the voice of the main character.
:eek: your right, she was pregnant in one sequence. But se did say it "her" lover.
Soo it's artificial insemination?! So much deep for a 1 sequence. Just like it was out of place in a white man ego-trip. Hmmm would you argue it's just put there out of place?

Do you think, Disney does control every second of a animated movie?

I would love to see a buzz lightyear black, if it's what it's take to level the plot of white men ego-trip.

I'm not a big fan of the movie either. It's was originally a toy cliché. Clearly Disney try to re-use the franchise.

Chris Evans replace the voice of Buzz :eek:
 
This is the part where I need to defend myself so people can express here.

You did fall for the obvious trap. And my stats represent who I am.

I'm really trying to start a discussion here with a open question and I'm well aware that there is a lot of Lgbt here.

Google say that 1.2 to 6.8% of the population is lgbt, and I know that a lot of people identify as in between. I said less then 1% because Disney choose to show a lesbian relation + different ethnic + adopted kid in one package. It's the full spectrum of lgbt in one couple. That is less then 1% of the population.

Disney did this with a intent. Because it doesn't bring nothing to the story. What is the intent? Why put lgbt everywhere for no reason? publicity? politically correct? give a voice to the minority?

Are they trying to seduce the 1.2 to 6.8% of the population?
Are there Cota to have minority representation?
Is there so much minority trying to take the spot that we have no choice to put them everywhere?
Are you ok with hollywood cota?
it's fine/too much/need more?

I love will & grace because lgbt is the main protagonist it's all about being a lgbt. But now it's only to fulfil Cota.

Ok, if the subject is too sensible, let's replace lgbt with an environmentalist "save to planet !" on every tv show. Would it be ok to you? I'm all for saving the planet, but I don't need to see an environmentalist on all my tv show?!

But in the end, to see lgbt on every movie/tv show it's not for me a strait guy it's for you the community of lgbt Or is it?

So my question, how this affect you? it's an open question.
This response tells me I was on the mark when I questioned the intent of your thread.

And while I don't profess to know ALL the ins and outs of my community, as someone who's been part of it for almost 50 years, I think I can safely say I know far more about it that you do or ever will. Especially given this thread.

Unless you work for the upper echelons of Disney and are privy to the inner workings and deliberations, this is just sheer conjecture on your part. Nonsense.

Re: Your comment on Will & Grace: How is this different than someone saying they have Black friends? Doesn't negate the underlying prejudice.

I enjoyed Will & Grace, but I know it's not reality. It was a TV show that premiered at a time when gay stereotypes were often prevalent in TV and movies. Will & Grace was no different. We've come a long long way since then.

"If the subject is too sensible" and trying to compare the thread topic now to the environment is a head scratcher. Irrelevant.

And the better question is not how does it affect me, but why does this affect/trigger you as it does?

And lead to you creating a thread that is anything but an "open question" as you continue to maintain. Because I maintain your thread is far from an "open question".

It smacks of an attempt to somehow couch your prejudices about the LGBTQ+ community, yet your opening post and stats indicate otherwise, and I've yet to see any attempt by you to have a open mind about your "open question".
 
Yep, not only Hollywood but all the media.
Suddenly they're all woke and there doesn't seem to be a drama comedy or whatever that doesn't feature some group of oppressed people who, five years ago would turn up just inside the radar.
I just think it would be better if the media were truthful instead of changing the sex and race of a character just so the event could be hailed as representative/innovative. It's not, its untruthful
 
Like some others I'm wondering "what is your point?" Are you researching for a Uni thesis or something!
But I'll way in on your Research.
50 + years ago I saw my first gay male character on a TV series. I tried not to show my 'delight' because it would draw attention to my teenage closeted self. He was Gay, out, camp, sensible, loving, strong, weak, bashed for being a homosexual... the full program. But it gave me a light of hope.
Over the years I've watched and enjoyed movies of which the focus was mostly 'gay'. Other movies may have well had their 'obligatory' gay characters!!

Now I'm different and don't watch the likes of Will & Grace at all.
BUT is your enquiry about : how do you think society has adjusted to having LGBTQi* people / characters in movies ?
Has it help non / anti LGBTQi* people realise that we are all humans?

OR

is your enquiry more 'how do you LGBTQi* people feel about being portrayed in movies just to make money?!
How does it feel to be Commercialised?
But doesn't that cover most of Hollywood? Making a buck!!

but ... if it all helps people to see each other, hopefully, in a more positive and individual light then maybe it has been a good thing!!

Or

are you thinking about intent?

one producer wants to Cash in

another wants to bring about change.

Whilst I gladly walk in a Pride March and attend certain ' LGBTQi' activities, I'm not walking around thinking 'I'm LGBTQi' all day.
A good movie is a good movie at the end of the day and I'm not thinking about statistics all the time and if a movie has a gay character then I'm pleased BUT if the movie etc. is shit ...
 
This response tells me I was on the mark when I questioned the intent of your thread.

And while I don't profess to know ALL the ins and outs of my community, as someone who's been part of it for almost 50 years, I think I can safely say I know far more about it that you do or ever will. Especially given this thread.

Unless you work for the upper echelons of Disney and are privy to the inner workings and deliberations, this is just sheer conjecture on your part. Nonsense.

Re: Your comment on Will & Grace: How is this different than someone saying they have Black friends? Doesn't negate the underlying prejudice.

I enjoyed Will & Grace, but I know it's not reality. It was a TV show that premiered at a time when gay stereotypes were often prevalent in TV and movies. Will & Grace was no different. We've come a long long way since then.

"If the subject is too sensible" and trying to compare the thread topic now to the environment is a head scratcher. Irrelevant.

And the better question is not how does it affect me, but why does this affect/trigger you as it does?

And lead to you creating a thread that is anything but an "open question" as you continue to maintain. Because I maintain your thread is far from an "open question".

It smacks of an attempt to somehow couch your prejudices about the LGBTQ+ community, yet your opening post and stats indicate otherwise, and I've yet to see any attempt by you to have a open mind about your "open question".

Thanks for your inside view of the LGBTQ+ community,
I understand that you would prefer even more presence or at least 1 character with a LGBTQ+ tag in every tv show/movies even if it's irrelevant to the stories.

I respect that, and I can see why you would prefer that.

If you want to know how it's affect me, I'm worried that Disney open the gate to all the minority and impose cota on their movies.

It's ok if it's relevant to the stories but if it's just to satisfy request for minority community I fear it wont be long before religion or all the obscure minority catch to the gig and use this to request cota on their part.
Take for example, "Ms. marvel", it's talk about Muslim community. It was nicely done, they even explain why one of the second character use veil. They could do the same for all religion.

But if the trend is to put every minority in every tv show just to satisfy pressure from community, it's a dangerous avenue.

But it's only my opinion. I respect yours.
 
Like some others I'm wondering "what is your point?" Are you researching for a Uni thesis or something!
But I'll way in on your Research.
50 + years ago I saw my first gay male character on a TV series. I tried not to show my 'delight' because it would draw attention to my teenage closeted self. He was Gay, out, camp, sensible, loving, strong, weak, bashed for being a homosexual... the full program. But it gave me a light of hope.
Over the years I've watched and enjoyed movies of which the focus was mostly 'gay'. Other movies may have well had their 'obligatory' gay characters!!

Now I'm different and don't watch the likes of Will & Grace at all.
BUT is your enquiry about : how do you think society has adjusted to having LGBTQi* people / characters in movies ?
Has it help non / anti LGBTQi* people realise that we are all humans?

OR

is your enquiry more 'how do you LGBTQi* people feel about being portrayed in movies just to make money?!
How does it feel to be Commercialised?
But doesn't that cover most of Hollywood? Making a buck!!

but ... if it all helps people to see each other, hopefully, in a more positive and individual light then maybe it has been a good thing!!

Or

are you thinking about intent?

one producer wants to Cash in

another wants to bring about change.

Whilst I gladly walk in a Pride March and attend certain ' LGBTQi' activities, I'm not walking around thinking 'I'm LGBTQi' all day.
A good movie is a good movie at the end of the day and I'm not thinking about statistics all the time and if a movie has a gay character then I'm pleased BUT if the movie etc. is shit ...

Thank you a lot, I may have expressed myself incorrectly at the start, It so clear to me that it's not about justifying gay on tv. But more about opening the gate to minority that would impose cota on hollywood.

To me LGBTQ are regular people and they have the right to be on tv as much as any other genre. It's more the use of it.

So yeah more the second or third of what you say.

I'm not LGBTQ so I wouldn't know if the trend now is better then the stereotype movies of the 80's?

I'm questioning the trend and I'm not an expert so I ask questions and open a discussion.
 
Thanks for your inside view of the LGBTQ+ community,
I understand that you would prefer even more presence or at least 1 character with a LGBTQ+ tag in every tv show/movies even if it's irrelevant to the stories.

I respect that, and I can see why you would prefer that.
I would appreciate it immensely if you would not attempt to misrepresent what I post. I did not speak to having any preference for anything. Those are YOUR words. Please and thanks!!!

If you want to know how it's affect me, I'm worried that Disney open the gate to all the minority and impose cota on their movies.

It's ok if it's relevant to the stories but if it's just to satisfy request for minority community I fear it wont be long before religion or all the obscure minority catch to the gig and use this to request cota on their part.
Take for example, "Ms. marvel", it's talk about Muslim community. It was nicely done, they even explain why one of the second character use veil. They could do the same for all religion.

But if the trend is to put every minority in every tv show just to satisfy pressure from community, it's a dangerous avenue.
Bottom line: Movie and TV show creators will write and produce what they believe will ultimately make money. And if there is a market for casting actors of whatever background or persuasion, that will happen. Because viewers are not just cis-gendered straight white people.

I also know that no matter what content is created and produced, someone will not like it. Like you. :) And that's okay.

But it's important to remember that that most viewers do not share your values. Or "concerns" you outline in your posts. Most viewers want to be entertained. Not spend time dissecting how many characters in how many movies are "different" from them.

And the end of the day, we are are entitled to our opinions. And I respect that.

What we should not be doing is stating our opinions supported with incomplete or erroneous stats.
 
Every minority group is underrepresented in mainstream Hollywood. Also women (who are in fact not a minority in the world) have less screentime and they earn less money for acting. The lead actor/hero is most often a white, cis, straight male.

The Captain of someone is not enough. There should be more LGBTQ heros, too.

So there is indeed a need for change in my opinion.
 
I would appreciate it immensely if you would not attempt to misrepresent what I post. I did not speak to having any preference for anything. Those are YOUR words. Please and thanks!!!


Bottom line: Movie and TV show creators will write and produce what they believe will ultimately make money. And if there is a market for casting actors of whatever background or persuasion, that will happen. Because viewers are not just cis-gendered straight white people.

I also know that no matter what content is created and produced, someone will not like it. Like you. :) And that's okay.

But it's important to remember that that most viewers do not share your values. Or "concerns" you outline in your posts. Most viewers want to be entertained. Not spend time dissecting how many characters in how many movies are "different" from them.

And the end of the day, we are are entitled to our opinions. And I respect that.

What we should not be doing is stating our opinions supported with incomplete or erroneous stats.
Sorry to have miss judge your arguments.

It's a good discussion we have here and it's good we don't have the same view on the subject.
Please don't interpret my discussion and questioning as a way to propagate cis-gendered straight white view. If you follow the discussion, it's about something else :).

I know most viewer don't have an opinion on the matter or don't share my values. A discussion is to start a learning process and have a better understanding at the end. If you don't have anything to say other then criticize the guy who post. Just don't say anything. But I do value your intake on the LGBTQ since I'm not.

It's hard to get your view on the subject, Other then "It's money talk". Do you think the concerns I mention are wrong or bias?

It's the third time you mention my erroneous stats?! Maybe I'm missing something? what's wrong with it? I'm more then happy to fixe a wrong information on my stats. I just don't know what your referring too.


With good intention, I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks
 
Every minority group is underrepresented in mainstream Hollywood. Also women (who are in fact not a minority in the world) have less screentime and they earn less money for acting. The lead actor/hero is most often a white, cis, straight male.

The Captain of someone is not enough. There should be more LGBTQ heros, too.

So there is indeed a need for change in my opinion.
Good comment, and I'm totally with you on this, women should have more screentime. I would argue that screentime should represent the percentage in the population to be fair. Minority group should represent the percentage they are in the society in a perfect world or not?

So you would like more leading hero's that represent LGBTQ? I think it's already a trend, "the boy's" have a LGBTQ hero. And Marvel have many actor playing LGBTQ hero's. It's a trend pretty much all tv show have their LGBTQ character. Stranger thing, Marvel, a lot of Disney movies, game of throne, etc.

It's a good thing to have multiethnic character or gender. where I'm concerned it's when it's became a cota Like in "lightyear". The line is slime, but it can open a lot of pressure on hollywood to show minority and adapt story telling just to satisfy politically correct request.

Am I the only one saying this?
 
Sorry to have miss judge your arguments.

It's a good discussion we have here and it's good we don't have the same view on the subject.
Please don't interpret my discussion and questioning as a way to propagate cis-gendered straight white view. If you follow the discussion, it's about something else :).

I know most viewer don't have an opinion on the matter or don't share my values. A discussion is to start a learning process and have a better understanding at the end. If you don't have anything to say other then criticize the guy who post. Just don't say anything. But I do value your intake on the LGBTQ since I'm not.

It's hard to get your view on the subject, Other then "It's money talk". Do you think the concerns I mention are wrong or bias?

It's the third time you mention my erroneous stats?! Maybe I'm missing something? what's wrong with it? I'm more then happy to fixe a wrong information on my stats. I just don't know what your referring too.


With good intention, I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks
I can assure you at no time was my efforts or intention here to criticize; quite the contrary. If you read my first post, you'll see I was taken aback by your Thread/Opening Post. Your reply to that, quite frankly, gave me more cause for pause. I'm glad that we now appear able to move past that. :)

I am happy to have a discussion with anyone here pretty much about anything IF that discussion is truly open to various opinions and when expressed, supported by facts. Facts matter. I'm aware that one can find pretty much any source on the intraweb that will support whatever position one wishes to take. I'm not one to accept "stats" when I know they are not truly accurate or representative of what it is being discussed.

As a gay man, I've had my share of being made to feel lesser than. For no other reason that my sexuality. And that's exactly how your Opening Post in this thread, presented as it was, made me feel. While it may not have been your intention, it struck me as more "how dare non-straight white people" be portrayed in TV and movies. That's why I challenged it and you. Because quite frankly, it's about damn time that TV and movies reflect the reality in which I live.

It's why you see more content that feature inter-racial couples. Same-sex couples. Inter-racial same-sex couples. And on and on. Because that's a reflection of what's going on in society. And, never forget that content creators know which demographics have the most spending power, or disposable income, if you will. Marketing is always happening. And savvy marketers adjust as society adjusts. Because the bottom line is always: how can I maximize my bottom line monetarily. Making money.

Today, there are a lot more than 1-6% who ID as non-hetereo. Important to remember that not every person has been or will be canvassed for how they choose to identify. That's why when I read stats, I consider the fact that it's a sampling. Of very few people in the big scheme of how many humans there are on this planet. And sadly, many people are simply afraid to identify when asked other than straight. Just about the only "class" of folks not looked down upon by mainstream society IMO.

I've learned through my 10 years at LPSG a lot about a lot that I had no idea even was a thing. I had no clue that so many men who identify as Straight will have sex with another man, yet they still ID as straight. I can't wrap my brain around that, though I do say I have tried. Or that if that same "straight" married man is fooling around with another man sexually, it's not cheating. That somehow it's only cheating when it's with another woman. WTF?

And while you or I don't have to necessarily understand all the different classifications and identities that exist now, it's important to accept that many people no longer choose to identify as gay, straight or bi. As has been the norm until recent times. I don't profess to know all the different identities that people use to describe themselves now, but it's a hell of a lot more than those three. Much more specific to each person. I love that.

Who am I to tell any other person how they should choose to identify? Because I don't want anyone to tell me how to identify. That's my personal choice. And if I wish to have my personal choice respected, we should do the same of others, no?

Society is too quick in trying to pigeonhole people into those categories or assign labels to those who are different from them. Rather than engage and learn about that which they don't know. I've always been a huge believer that ignorance can be overcome, stupid not so much. ;)

Now, to the subject of your thread.

No, I don't care about how many characters on TV or in movies are gay, straight, bi, pansexual, demisexual, whatever. I don't care if a straight person is hired to play a gay role or a gay person is hired to play a straight role. Or any other identification. I get that Hollywood often casts (miscasts at times!) actors because of their box office pull. Or other popularity.

What I care about is that type of character's role and/or portrayal is not stereotypical or promote such. Or gratuitous. That it contributes to the story. I think that's what most viewers want. A time to escape their reality and be entertained. And maybe even find out they learned something without realizing they did!

Let me finish by saying I firmly believe every human being is flawed. Regardless of how we choose to identify or how society chooses to label us. Being whatever doesn't make anyone a better person because of that; it's their character and how they choose to treat and understand their fellow man. And if someone is a good person with an open heart, sit them next to me!

At the end of the day, humans are much more alike than different. I find it funny that we raise young people to be unique. Be yourself. And when being themselves means identifying as something other than cis-gendered white straight, that's when the issues begin to surface.

I apologize for the long-windedness with this post. Your thread struck a nerve. I hope we can all have a viable and open discussion in which we all may learn a thing or two or three. ;)