Does size matters?

Discussion in 'New Member Introductions' started by Landshark77, Jul 1, 2005.

  1. Landshark77

    Landshark77 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dallas, TX.
  2. Landshark77

    Landshark77 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dallas, TX.
    I found this on the internet and thought I would share. So just in case you have doubts that your hung.... just look at this poor fella.
     
  3. Knight

    Knight New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sheffield, England
    Thats bad. He looks like a pretty big guy (build wise). Four inches is just about enough for sex but I think 2" just isn't enough for most people. I'm 4 times bigger than him :eek:
     
  4. surferboy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,182
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunrise, Florida
    Is that a micro penis?
     
  5. hippyscum

    hippyscum New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes, anything under 2 1/2 inches-ish is a micro penis
     
  6. Freddie53

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,285
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The South, USA
    This is why the average erect penis is only 5.1 inches. Yes there are the big ones. But there are more micro penises in the world than most guys realize according to what I have read.

    It is almost impossible to get a sample of guys that are representative of the world for measurements to get an average. Guys can't be forced to be measured and the ones especially under 2 and 1/2 and over nine are reluctant to be measured.

    I have seen this picture before I think. Anyway I am glad someone posted it becasue the average guy here would not believe that a micropenis really existed without seeing a picture or seeing a real one.

    From what I have read over 50 percent of guys are from 5 to 6 inches in erect length, not 8 inches with the thickness of a beer can.
     
  7. surferboy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,182
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunrise, Florida

    Good point. I wish like, all men could have that piece of info when like, they read those surveys in the nudie zines. Those zines make it so like, 7 inches seems like the average. When, in fact, as you said, it's 5.1"
     
  8. Dr. Dilznick

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    1
    LOL I don't believe that for a second.




    Recently (well, in 1988) Paul L. Jamison and Paul H. Gebhard subjected the Kinsey data to an intense statistical analysis, ironing out certain anomalies, correcting subject bias and measurement error with various mathematical operations we need not go into here. Their results (shown below) were published in the Journal for Sex Research (vol. 24, pp. 177-183).


    Mean Standard Deviation

    Flaccid penis length (in.) 3.89 0.73
    Erect penis length (in.) 6.21 0.77

    Flaccid penis circumference (in.) 3.75 0.65
    Erect penis circumference (in.) 4.85 0.71
     
  9. Ineligible

    Ineligible Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Kinsey's penis size data was based on asking guys their size. Where people weren't sure, they showed them a ruler. This isn't a good way to get reliable data.

    The actual data in fact bounces up and down from even half inch measurements to odd quarter inches.

    There's no way that systematic bias and "measurement error" can be statistically removed from data. You can't get information out that isn't there, and how much the average guy was overstating his size just isn't in the data.
     
  10. madame_zora

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,252
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Ohio
    All these things you say are true, as well as the fact that I am unaware of any survey where direct measurement was used with a significant sample size. I still refer to Kinsey rather than the reworking of datum from people who were not even present! I would tend to believe that the Kinsey data would be overestimated rather than under, for the very reasons you noted.
     
  11. contortionist

    contortionist New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    309
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dr Dil is right about size. Those who claim the average is 5.1'' ARE 5.1'' and want to be average. I realise guys don't spend their life asking each other how big they are ( sorry you gays boys) but just walking through the shower room confirms this. My best guess would be over 6'' minimum
     
  12. Knight

    Knight New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sheffield, England
    I think 80% of people are less than or equal to 6" erect. The average being around 5.5"

    Maybe not though...I don't really care anymore lol. But a 6" average minimum is a bit high methinks.
     
  13. blasian

    blasian New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, I'm sure he could gain at least another inch if he lost some weight. I got about 1" after I stopped eating fast food a few years ago.

    ...maybe someone here could find it in their heart to donate. C'mon, there's gotta be someone with at least one inch they aren't using!
     
  14. jimmyjoejeater

    jimmyjoejeater New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    northeast Indiana
    That poor guy. I wonder if he's ever been asked if it's in yet... LOL!

    REally tho, I have a pic of a guy with one even smaller than that. I'll try and attach it. HOpe it works.


    jimmy

     
  15. surferboy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,182
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunrise, Florida
    [post=326132]Quoted post[/post]​
    [/b][/quote]


    Oh my gosh. My 5 year old brother has a bigger donger than that dude. That has to be photo shopped :unsure:
     
  16. Pye

    Pye
    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2005
    Messages:
    828
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    58
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Rhode Island, USA
    Verified:
    Photo
    [post=326132]Quoted post[/post]​
    [/b][/quote]

    THAT is a microcock
     
  17. Knight

    Knight New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sheffield, England
  18. surferboy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,182
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunrise, Florida
    Knight (ya know what? I don't know yer name, oh well) he has thickness though. And he's not that small. Like, prolly 5.5-5 long.
     
  19. dolf250

    dolf250 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Great White North
    It may seem strange- but until now I have not heard of a micro penis. Is it a genetic condition or is it caused by environmental factors? I know that size is not the be all and end all- but being that small would bring a whole host of issues that would be very difficult to “get over.”
     
  20. hippyscum

    hippyscum New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    0
    it's definitely not caused by environmental factors. whatever set of genes control penis size, causes this. and yeah, the issues brought on by this could be quite damaging, i remember reading that a micropenis is too small to have sex with, which is quite a shame, some people just get the shitty end of the stick when it comes to genetics.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted