StormfrontFL
Superior Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Posts
- 8,903
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 6,853
- Points
- 358
- Location
- United States
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Let's not forget that he didn't dislike Obama because of his race. His reasons were...
not enough political experience
racially divisive
too much indecision
Of those three tRump has
NO political experience
racially divisive rhetoric
constant flip flop of his statements
If somehow that's not important anymore all that can be assumed is that those reasons given were false. What could be the reason for being that anti Obama? Hmmm....
LOL?
The LOL is all mine as I watch Trump eviscerate Reaganomics. What will you guys cook up next to continue robbing the poor (the 99%).http://theweek.com/articles/619365/donald-trump-killed-reaganomics-thats-okay
And when you connect-the-dots and tally the total do you get Donald Trump/Archie Bunker/Lee Atwater? A very toxic soup du jour.
Last edited by a moderator:
The Biginning of the end..Its gonna be a long slow, grueling 6 months for the Donald, and longer for his believers and supporters..
Donald Trump’s Pledge to Defend Spending for Old and Poor Belied by Staff Picks
https://theintercept.com/2016/05/16...or-belied-by-staff-picks/?comments=1#comments
Donald Trump’s Pledge to Defend Spending for Old and Poor Belied by Staff Picks
https://theintercept.com/2016/05/16...or-belied-by-staff-picks/?comments=1#comments
rbkwp
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 79,702
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 45,273
- Points
- 608
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
good start, predicting how he will get on with other leaders
not to clever in commenting on,, i dont think ..
Donald Trump Says He Probably Won't Get Along Too Well With the British Prime Minister
In case anybody is still unaware, Donald Trump really doesn't like being called stupid — and he's definitely not too fussed about diplomacy.
https://news.vice.com/article/donal...ly-wont-get-along-too-well-with-david-cameron
rbkwp
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 79,702
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 45,273
- Points
- 608
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
this
is what we read over here, about your possible future president/even if he doesent get there
its made itself the ultimate fool
what an embarrasment, but i dont need to cotinue saying the obvious
that everyone knows of, WW
'Divisive, stupid and wrong' - Cameron on Trump
Tuesday 17 May 2016
Read more: http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/d...g---cameron-on-trump-2016051706#ixzz48qzvsu5a
is what we read over here, about your possible future president/even if he doesent get there
its made itself the ultimate fool
what an embarrasment, but i dont need to cotinue saying the obvious
that everyone knows of, WW
'Divisive, stupid and wrong' - Cameron on Trump
Tuesday 17 May 2016
Read more: http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/d...g---cameron-on-trump-2016051706#ixzz48qzvsu5a
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
- Posts
- 435
- Media
- 26
- Likes
- 996
- Points
- 523
- Location
- Chicago (Illinois, United States)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Well, Jon Stewart is intelligent, knowledgeable, and insightful as FUCK when it comes to politics, so yeah, his points of view on political matters are always worth paying attention to. But this particular statement could have been said by Mayor McCheese, and it wouldn't have made me doubt its validity because it's pretty much self-evident.
rbkwp
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 79,702
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 45,273
- Points
- 608
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
akwas one in the alternative,nothing wrong with that huh, es ha ..
Harry Potter author JK Rowling defends Trump's right to be 'offensive'
Harry Potter author JK Rowling defends Donald Trump's right to be "offensive" at a literary event in New York, after last year saying he was worse than her fictional villain, Voldemort.
![]()
Harry Potter author JK Rowling defends Trump's right to be 'offensive'
Harry Potter author JK Rowling defends Donald Trump's right to be "offensive" at a literary event in New York, after last year saying he was worse than her fictional villain, Voldemort.
Last edited:
So the big news of the day is Donald is now taking his marching orders from the plutocratic Heritage Foundation and he will keep the Supreme Court as crooked as ever.
Donald Trump releases list of 11 potential Supreme Court nominees
Donald Trump releases list of 11 potential Supreme Court nominees
rbkwp
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 79,702
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 45,273
- Points
- 608
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
thanks sargon
received the nyt alert on his 'list'
and was wondering what it was all about ha
youve given me a good indication
never ceases to amaze that guy
gee wonder what mischief he will get up to if he makes president or even if not
seems to have the political bug now
like a spoilt kid, i am believing he just loves that attention, no matter what ..
received the nyt alert on his 'list'
and was wondering what it was all about ha
youve given me a good indication
never ceases to amaze that guy
gee wonder what mischief he will get up to if he makes president or even if not
seems to have the political bug now
like a spoilt kid, i am believing he just loves that attention, no matter what ..
No news here. He said early on that he would delegate the SCOTUS to Heritage. You wonder why the right is okay with the rest of his shit?
When it comes to the next supreme court pick, I don't really care if it is a conservative or a liberal as long as they are an originalist. One who reads the constitution as it was written rather through a modern PC lens. For instance, the rumbles about Ted Cruz not being eligible for the presidency due to the fact that he was not born in this country. The Constitution says that as long as you are a natural born citizen, you can run for the office. Under modern immigration law, if one of your parents is a citizen then your child is also regardless of where you are when they are born. BUT the term natural born citizen, at the time the constitution was signed, meant that you were born in the united states or it's territories. By an originalists reading, Ted Cruz would not be eligible to run for President. Under a modernists reading the same exact passage, but through a redefinition of the terms there in, he would be eligible to run for the office.
In my view, the constitution can be added to and subtracted from via amendments, but you can't just start twisting words to suit a narrative that happens to be "trending" right now. It has to be read in the context from which it was written. Popular or not. Liberal or conservative means nothing to me when picking a new justice. Can he or she put their personal politics and religious beliefs aside when forming a legal opinion and go solely by the letter of the law.
In my view, the constitution can be added to and subtracted from via amendments, but you can't just start twisting words to suit a narrative that happens to be "trending" right now. It has to be read in the context from which it was written. Popular or not. Liberal or conservative means nothing to me when picking a new justice. Can he or she put their personal politics and religious beliefs aside when forming a legal opinion and go solely by the letter of the law.
Yes and no. His reading of the constitution was in line with the way it was meant to be read, but his opinions were almost always tainted by his conservatives bias. It's extremely difficult to remove your personal beliefs on what is right and wrong from a legal decision knowing that your words will dictate some aspect of how 300+ million people live their lives.
Scalia routinely pushed his religious and political views rather than restricting his statements about a case purely to the law. That's the problem with calling a judges decision on a case a legal opinion... they tend to stick their opinions in it.