titan1968
Loved Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Posts
- 876
- Media
- 5
- Likes
- 748
- Points
- 313
- Location
- Montreal (Quebec, Canada)
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
According to the Oxford Dictionary, to discriminate can mean to 'make an unjust distinction in the treatment of different groups of people on the grounds of race, sex, or age.'
If one grants more opportunity to a discriminated group, as is the case in a positive action programme, don't we take away opportunities from the 'majority'? Aren't we discriminating against the majority? Again, I fail to understand how positive discrimination can still be positive?
I'm not trying to split hairs. I just find the term illogical.
If one grants more opportunity to a discriminated group, as is the case in a positive action programme, don't we take away opportunities from the 'majority'? Aren't we discriminating against the majority? Again, I fail to understand how positive discrimination can still be positive?
I'm not trying to split hairs. I just find the term illogical.
Actually, this one makes sense. To discriminate means to distinguish between one thing and another by some criteria. It's original meaning has no positive or negative connotation.
However, in practice, when applied to races, discrimination has come to mean granting less opportunity to one race over another. That clearly has a negative connotation.
So the term "positive discrimination" would mean to grant more opportunity to a particular race. For example, if Native Americans are discriminated against in the work place, an affirmative action program could compensate for that by applying "positive discrimination".
Although this makes sense, it is still annoying. So it belongs on this list of Doublespeak.