So, we had an interesting discussion in Psychology class today, and I thought I'd share it with you all, and get your reactions on this.
According to Freud, our dreams are based in our subconscious, and are usually trying to tell us something about ourselves, or possibly future experiences. He thinks that everything we dream is symbolic in nature, and even created a huge book dedicated to what certain objects mean in dreams. BUT... a man named Hobson has his own theory on dreams, which basically states that our dreams are nothing more than neural networks in our brains firing randomly, and that our brain is designed to make sense of things... so in order for us, during sleep, to make sense of what these neural networks are doing, our brain creates a story of sorts, and that's what we call a dream. Hence the reason that our dreams sometimes seem to make no sense at all, like cats talking on a cell phone... that could be created, according to Hobson, if our neural networks involving cats and cell phones fire at the same time. Our brain makes sense of this by assuming that the cat would be talking on the cell phone, given our knowledge of what cell phones are used for.
So my question is... do you side more with Freud, or more with Hobson? Or do you have another set of beliefs on this subject altogether? Do tell. :smile:
According to Freud, our dreams are based in our subconscious, and are usually trying to tell us something about ourselves, or possibly future experiences. He thinks that everything we dream is symbolic in nature, and even created a huge book dedicated to what certain objects mean in dreams. BUT... a man named Hobson has his own theory on dreams, which basically states that our dreams are nothing more than neural networks in our brains firing randomly, and that our brain is designed to make sense of things... so in order for us, during sleep, to make sense of what these neural networks are doing, our brain creates a story of sorts, and that's what we call a dream. Hence the reason that our dreams sometimes seem to make no sense at all, like cats talking on a cell phone... that could be created, according to Hobson, if our neural networks involving cats and cell phones fire at the same time. Our brain makes sense of this by assuming that the cat would be talking on the cell phone, given our knowledge of what cell phones are used for.
So my question is... do you side more with Freud, or more with Hobson? Or do you have another set of beliefs on this subject altogether? Do tell. :smile: