Two things about your little rant that just makes me so bored:
1 - distorting what I said to fit into what you wanted me to have said, so you can clap back;
2 - using exceptions as the rules. quick example: Kim K managed to become one of the most powerful celebrities of this century while Pam Anderson had any chance of a film acting career forever ruined. Both of them went trough the same situation. But of course you're gonna ignore 3 decades of Pam's life in which she was humiliated and objectified by pervs in the industry and offered no serious acting roles just so you can point out that she's doing a musical in 2022, so everything is doing fine and the sextape leak never affected her. You're also gonna invalidate my example saying that Pam isn't talented so she never had a chance in the first place. See how boring you sound? And it almost feels like I punched you in the face by the way you replied. Chill, man lmfao.
You are just getting funnier by the second...
1) I didn't distort anything you said.
2) You are the one making the claim. I easily refuted your claim because it was flat out stupid.
To even take your current example, Pam's sex tape hurt her career? Sure. But how did it affect Tommy's career? It barely made a dent. The topic here is men - which even you tried to point out but are running away from after you've been shown to be wrong.
For women, something like a sex tape brands them as "sluts" but for men it turns them into "studs".
It's a horrible double standard and it's wrong, but that's how society is and has been for a while.
How many men had their career ruined by sex tapes or finding out they did sex work?
I'm not talking about a republican congressman that was caught with another man or something illegal like child porn.
There are far fewer men it hurt their careers than the ones who either ignored it or jump started it.