Dylan geick

[Fakeyboi129]

You’re talking about a different photo sis

I must've missed them, I didn't know. When did this happen?

 

[nightbat]

I must've missed them, I didn't know. When did this happen?

A few minutes before my last post someone posted a photo that was a screenshot of a comment from someone named Red Cube, below their comment was a larger sized uncensored photo of Dylan we have not seen in full size before but is part of the smaller censored preview collection, Red Cube said he made the photo and it was fake and anyone claiming it was real is a scam... interestingly the exact same thing you are saying about the other dick photo... are you Red Cube?

The photo looked very real to me, a mod, or the person who posted the screenshot, must have deleted the post because it vanished very quickly.

 

[deleted4197341]

I'm only here for the popcorn and tea, but I'm curious. Why would this Red Cube person, if he or she had the originals, deliberately create a fake? That seems weird. And I've done enough (professional) Photoshop work to know that you can't pull that red watermark off the "original fake" without artifacts appearing in the "BMB fake" that follow. But there's no sign of artifacts, although the BMB is slightly fuzzier. But even that loss of precision isn't helpful, given that the red line of text crosses what appears (in the BMB version) to be a fold in the mattress sheet, which no currently available watermark removal tool could re-create from pattern analysis alone.

@nightbat may well be right in his assessment.

You must not be very good at your (professional) Photoshopping then.

People are actually going to believe a proven scammer? How many times does BMB have to be proven to be full of shit?

 

[deleted1338543]

You must not be very good at your (professional) Photoshopping then.

People are actually going to believe a proven scammer? How many times does BMB have to be proven to be full of shit?

I don't know about BMB; I find the overall bait scene to be sufficiently tiring that I don't bother to study the minutiae of who-does-what-to-whom. I do know that I was the photo editor for a newspaper for a while. And I know that current watermark-removal algorithms, interpreted in light of the quoted photo, can't reproduce elements not already present in the watermarked image.

 

[3mynimbers]

has anyone tried contacting red cube?

 

[CS4282000]

i am now convinced someone, or a group of someones, is desperately trying to push a narrative that all Dylan photos are fake. if you can't stop the photos from leaking, and you can't get them removed, the next best thing is to cast doubt on there legitimacy.

the dick in this photo looks exactly the same as the other leaked photo, people claimed that photo was fake to, but that photo came from a different source.

so either these people have the full set of uncensored photos and instead of releasing them they are photoshoping the same fake dick over his real dick, OR these photos are real and some shady cats are getting angry that their exclusives are leaking for free or they are just simps for Dylan and will scream "fake" to cast doubt and save face.

I agree, there’s just no way they haven’t been leaked yet and I believe the photos we’ve seen are real.

 

[Dokteki]

I agree, there’s just no way they haven’t been leaked yet and I believe the photos we’ve seen are real.

And with all these people making fakes, when the real ones emerge they can just claim they are fake.

 

[Jondoe12345]

The thing I heard tho was that at first he didn’t put any red watermark in the picture lol, he sent it for fun to another person on telegram with no red watermark whatsoever and that person leaked it saying it was real, being a fake tho. After that a funny guy decided to add the BMB watermark to sell it, when red cube found out he added his watermarks to the first fake with no watermark to post and let people know not to get scammed. So no one removed watermarks lol cause the pics were shared separately, but that’s what I heard on telegram. Why just wonder why someone would claim it was fake if it wasn’t? And how would the guy have access to the pic if not to make the fakes lol. Take it for what you want, but that dick doesn’t look like a Caucasian dick. Anyways If there are real pics only Dylan can say if it’s his dick or not, and if he was -18 why not close this threat like crusher mentioned?

I'm only here for the popcorn and tea, but I'm curious. Why would this Red Cube person, if he or she had the originals, deliberately create a fake? That seems weird. And I've done enough (professional) Photoshop work to know that you can't pull that red watermark off the "original fake" without artifacts appearing in the "BMB fake" that follow. But there's no sign of artifacts, although the BMB is slightly fuzzier. But even that loss of precision isn't helpful, given that the red line of text crosses what appears (in the BMB version) to be a fold in the mattress sheet, which no currently available watermark removal tool could re-create from pattern analysis alone.

@nightbat may well be right in his assessment.

 

[LuciferBTW]

I don't find the account of "Red Cube", it has been deleted ??

 

[surroundingme]

Hmmmm...

That photo is really Dylan. Nothing looks fake about it at all.

 

[Jmol.san]

That photo is really Dylan. Nothing looks fake about it at all.

That’s what I’m saying!! How could that not be real?

 

[glguy25]

H

Hmmmm...

Hope he gets to 500!

 

[Asterious]

Post has been deleted? Must've been real

 

[HDbiker]

Post has been deleted? Must've been real

Actually, it was a photo that someone around here has been claiming is a fake that they made. And that their fake was "stolen" by another website and posted as the "real thing". It also may have been a photo of him underage ... maybe not.

I believe LPSG has been deleting any photo that is questionable, just to stay on the safe side.

 

[kittygalore]

Actually, it was a photo that someone around here has been claiming is a fake that they made. And that their fake was "stolen" by another website and posted as the "real thing". It also may have been a photo of him underage ... maybe not.

I believe LPSG has been deleting any photo that is questionable, just to stay on the safe side.

Why the hell are people constantly posting these pics that they know aren't allowed and will be deleted. What isn't getting into people heads that they mighn't be of an adult nature.

 

[Dokteki]

Why the hell are people constantly posting these pics that they know aren't allowed and will be deleted. What isn't getting into people heads that they mighn't be of an adult nature.

They probably don't know and are too stupid to do some basic research. People re-post stuff here all the time after saying...I don't think this one has been posted before...sometimes the same pic is a few posts above theirs.

 

[Thomas Sarkisian]

Ehhh Give it a couple of weeks. They will leak. This is exactly like the Jack Johnson thread, we know they exist now. It's only a matter of time when they the uncensored ones leak.

Where is the Jack Johnson thread?? Cant find it

 

[CS4282000]

is that real?! View attachment 17153451 View attachment 17153461

Despite what many may tell you, I personally think it’s real and just being called fake to drown out any hope for the leaks coming out

 

[Dokteki]

Why the hell are people constantly posting these pics that they know aren't allowed and will be deleted. What isn't getting into people heads that they mighn't be of an adult nature.

Here we go again. How many hours before it is re=posted again?

 

[deleted1338543]

1.5 hours ... mark.