Early Christmas: PYM banned

Status
Not open for further replies.

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
recently saw where PYM was banned..permanently.

Hmm. He was forwarding my posts to the FBI, NSA and White House.

But that wasn't enough; he then started forwarding to local law enforcement agencies in Cincinnati.

I'm not a shrink, but I think somebody has some mental health issues.
 

D_Rod Staffinbone

Account Disabled
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Posts
834
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
103
Sexuality
No Response
one should not snitch to the government merely based on posts that express one's opinion, unless there is a serious threat to someone's safety. of course the feds are always in contact with local law enforcement. for what it's worth, if pym really sent snitching emails to the white house, the nsa, and the fbi, (as he, in fact, threatened to do on two occasions that i know of) he's probably being investigated too.

in fact, it's more than likely that the sender of email to those agencies would be investigated first. this is more common than most people think (or want to know).

obama was talking a lot about cybersecurity in the past couple of days. the nsa knows everytime we post certain words or phrases, and has filters to narrow it down to try to screen for specific threats.

it's a can of worms. liberal or conservative doesn't matter when
you intentionally open a can of worms. (and that might not even be the reason pym was banned).
 
Last edited:

B_Stronzo

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Posts
4,588
Media
0
Likes
130
Points
183
Location
Plimoth Plantation
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
We ALL "have mental issues" in some manner, shape, or form.

I need to say something here.

I've been down this road. Those of you here who know me from years ago know it. I knew "pym" only slightly but what little banter we had was civil. That's what I'll go on.

What constituted the decision to ban him is none of my business.

But most importantly I'd like to state without equivocation that these "let's have at the poor bastard when they can't respond" threads are in the poorest of taste. It's mean-spirited, after the fact, and petty. Recall - it's happened to me so I know what's behind it.

It occurs to me that as a species we have better things to do than kick someone when they're down.

SOUR GRAPES
 
Last edited:

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
We ALL "have mental issues" in some manner, shape, or form.

I need to say something here.

I've been down this road. Those of you here who know me from years ago know it. I knew "pym" only slightly but what little banter we had was civil. That's what I'll go on.

What constituted the decision to ban him is none of my business.

But most importantly I'd like to state without equivocation that these "let's have at the poor bastard when they can't respond" threads are in the poorest of taste. It's mean-spirited, after the fact, and petty. Recall - it's happened to me so I know what's behind it.

It occurs to me that as a species we have better things to do than kick someone when they're down.

SOUR GRAPES

LOL.

Okeydokey.

The only poster doing any kicking around here was PYM. Take a look at his posting history, douchebag.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Posts
23,294
Media
0
Likes
11,402
Points
358
What constituted the decision to ban him is none of my business.

But most importantly I'd like to state without equivocation that these "let's have at the poor bastard when they can't respond" threads are in the poorest of taste. It's mean-spirited, after the fact, and petty.

We have better things to do than kick someone when they're down.

Well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.