I heard this on the news earlier and was a bit puzzled as I wasn't familiar with the history. I'm glad it passed. :smile:
Yet I can't believe they thought it was acceptable to have celibate, gay clergy; but not someone with a life partner? Are people in love somehow not fit to preach? That makes no sense to me. I'm not dissing Lutherans, it just sounds stupid to an untrained ear. :redface: It's like the time our neighbors gave their youngest son a really expensive stereo for Christmas; but didn't give him the speakers until he brought his grades up in algebra and biology.
The fact this only passed by 108 votes is a tad troubling, but at least it passed.
nj,
No, your observations are not surprising. You have to realize that each denomination is making these decisions while dragging along their entire worldwide congregation, with each member on a different part of the spectrum from conservative to very progressive, from rural to urban, etc. Although each denomination establishes and maintains its doctrine about things, each denomination varies in the strength of its hierarchy in terms of how much influence they have.
For example, Catholicism has a strong hierarchy whereas ELCA Lutheranism is more "congregational" in its structure, leaving each region and each local congregation a lot of leeway. So steering the coarse of major decisions like this across the entire worldwide church is kind of like herding cats.
As for celibacy or non-celibacy in gays, what you are seeing is denominations trying to balance their discernment between Biblical law (which seems to condemn homosexuality) and Biblical Gospel, which preaches loudly that God loves and forgives unconditionally. ELCA Lutheranism, Episcopalianism and some others are very big on the second part, which is God's universal unconditional love and forgiveness. This drives them towards favoring the Gospel while keeping an eye on the Law as a guideline, rather than conservative doctrines that teach that adherence to the Law is the route to salvation.
The struggle goes back to Jesus time and before. Jesus illuminates it beautifully in The Good Samaritan Parable where he raises the despicable heathen Samaritan (despicable as far as his audience is concerned) up as the Christlike person who has compassion for the guy lying in the road. Jesus contrasts this against the seemingly unfeeling and uncompassionate holy men who cross to the other side of the road because their religious Law (the Jewish Purity Laws of the time) tells them to avoid death, sickness, and other forms of corruption in order to keep themselves pure and pleasing to God.
It is pretty clear what Jesus is saying here, and he says it to illustrate his answer to a someone in the crowd who asks him what the greatest commandments are. His answer is not one of the ten commandments, but to Love God and Love Neighbor. He even finishes it off by saying, "...all the Law and all the Prophecies hang on these two."
Furthermore Jesus breaks religous Law plenty of times in the New Testament, but always when he is trading off Law for compassion.
For the last two thousand years, different Christian denominations have struggled with where they think they should be in this dynamic tension between Law and Gospel.
If you are strong on Law, you would read the Bible and tend to see homosexual acts as sinful, because of some of the passages. But if you were not altogether totally bonkers, you would admit to each other that we are all sinners for one thing or another, and our role as a Christians is to seek out and support any part of the population that is marginalized just as Jesus did all the time. So you would welcome homosexuals, murderers, rapists and everyone you thought was marginalized as sinners or castigated by society. However, if any one of them were still practicing whatever you considered their sinful behavior, you would not ordain them as clergy making them into your spiritual leaders. (But you would still welcome them into your congregation, pray for them, and do whatever it takes to turn themselves around.)
What has been happening over the last few decades, though is that a number of denominations are rethinking their opinion on homosexuality and coming away from the notion that practicing homosexuality is sinful. They are dragging themselves out of the dark ages and starting to recognize that not only are homosexuals God's children like everyone else, (many denominations had gotten that far a while ago), but the sexual practices of homosexuality are not that big a deal when you have other things to consider, such as long term relationships, real lasting love and committment between two human beings, etc.
So denominations like the ELCA Lutherans have come to believe that homosexuals are God's children, that homosexuality seems to be a natural human phenomenon and not simply a bad lifestyle choice, it cannot be "cured" by praying away the gay like fundies belive, and that those sections of the Bible that may or may not refer to it as sinful are either spurious, wrongly interpreted, or the Law that they advocate is strongly overriden by these other compassionate concerns.
Therefore, if homosexuality is natural, and we are all pretty much unfaithful when it comes to the Law anyway, homosexuals are to be warmly welcomed into the congregation, included into all activities, and now the same rules apply to them as to anyone else being considered to be ordained, which is to be single and celibate or be in a longterm committed relationship where you can be sexually active. If you are either one, you are welcome to become blessed as a spiritual leader of the church.
Because, what remains is the notion that sex outside of marriage is sinful. So it applies equally to gay and straight candidates for ordination. But what also remains is that we are all sinners somewhere and somehow, so promiscuous gays and straights in uncommitted relationships are welcome into the church like the rest of us rat-bastards, but just not welcome to be spiritual leaders.
As I said before, denominations have to make these shifts while dragging millions of members worldwide along with them, and that is difficult to do. As it is, the Episcopalians has lost a big chunk of their congregations who split off to form a more conservative organization when they elected their gay bishop as head of the American Episcopalian church a while ago. The ELCA Lutherans will probably lose a chunk, too, over this decision, but the clause that allows an individual congregation to choose not to call a gay minister to be their pastor may stem that a bit while the techtonic plates shift a bit more into position.
Another thing about the Lutherans is that they are very active in building bridges to all the other Christian denominations. They have formed official agreements of one sort or another with different denominations where they state their agreement on basic theological notions such as God's grace being sufficient for salvation. In fact, an Episcopalian Pastor can become a pastor at a Lutheran church and vice-versa. And I think they just formed the same agreement with the United Methodists. Although the Pastor exchange thing is not in the agreement with the RC church, they do have an agreement that their basic notions on salvation (God's grace being sufficient) are the same.
The irony is that the original denomination that caused the Protestant Reformation to begin with is also the denomination that is the most active in healing it all back up. Luther never wanted to break away from the RC church. (ragardless of all the nasty stuff he said about it at the time) He just wanted to reform it. It was the RC church that rejected him. After that it was a bloodbath, but that is not how it started.
It is this bridge building that causes the Lutherans to be slightly less radical in pushing themselves forward in contrast to other denominations. I see that as a two edged sword. Is it more faithful to bring the worldwide church back together, or is it more faithful to be a reformer and turn the money changer's tables over in the temple courtyard.
Anyway, religion is just as complex as politics, unfortunately, since organized religion is a human construct. There is nothing you can say about that is not an oversimplification.
Consider this announcement as very good news. It won't be long before the Methodists and others announce the same thing. The margin by which these proposals lose from year to year gets smaller and soon it will cross the line into full acceptance.
As for the fundies, I can't speak for them. (Since they speak for themselves all the time.)
A longtime Lutheran gay advocacy organization.
"God hates Fangs." - Fellowship of the Sun