See topic.
For laughs, how many of you actually believe that Mandingo is closer to 8.4" than he is to 9"? Because for a full pregnancy's term that is precisely what this sdp dude has been persistently determined to convince you of.
The overwhelming majority of his "findings" purport that Mandingo's dick is in the 8.3-8.9" range. Yeah that's right. I didn't typo. This dude actually has dozens -- scores even -- of assertions in his dubious thread which confidently estimate Mandingo around 8.5 inches - even more laughably, he has several where he so "scientifically" applies his patented "formula" to assert Mandingo's dick is around (and I quote) "7.92 inches"
![Lindsay-Lohan-Spits-Out-Drink.gif]()
Yeah. He honestly looks at some of those pics and thinks, Mandingo "realistically" looks about 8 and 1/8th inches. Or even shorter... Yeah, even shorter than 8 and 1/8th.
In fact, no less that 6 times he had the audacity to record and post for public viewing that he assessed Mandingo's dick to be LESS THAN 8 INCHES:
7.92"
7.98"
7.93"
7.92" - what AGAIN? YEP!
7.98" - from another scene altogether? YEP!
7.81"
![1akopf.jpg]()
Funny how those 7.92's and 7.98 duplicate findings showed up in different scenes with different women and different angles and different distances from the camera.
No. We've not been confused about the varying monikers of different porn performers. THE Mandingo. The guy whose very uncommon member, which is the subject of great furor throughout the adult entertainment industry, and given the very nature of this community, predictably the size of which is easily the most contentiously debated topic on LPSG, depicted here:
![02.jpg]()
So I could see how someone may get the impression Mandingo's member is about 9 inches. I wouldn't even rule out estimations above that. While 9.5 may sound like a stretch, that's still just half an inch beyond what I believe most people would view as a realistic and conservative estimation of Mandingo's dick length.
But 8.12 inches?
8.15?
8.11?
8.08?
Are you serious? How are you even considering those into your data collection, professor? How are those not automatically ruled out? They are not even PLAUSIBLE to anyone with at least an elementary grasp of measurement and spatial perception.
I realize appearances can be deceiving, but we are not in a John Carpenter film and Mandingo is not an optical illusion. He penis is not a product of Industrial Light and Magic. He's not the world's first real-time interactive holographic humanoid indistinguishable from flesh and blood pornstars, as some have speculated.
How can you have such utter wholesale distrust of your very own eyes and those of virtually everyone else around you along with the testimonials of all those females who worked with Mandingo saying he was the largest they had ever seen?
I like to think of myself as a cynical bloke. But sometimes you can have a modicum of faith in your senses.
![leadtheylive1.jpg]()
It's like your trying to tell us the Empire State Building does not exist. Look Galileo, WE CAN SEE IT WITH OUR OWN EYEBALLS.
Cuz right now sdp you're coming across as one of those "resident experts" called on to spin theoretical yarns as facts, cleverly engaging in sleight of hand to bamboozle a captive audience of yokels with flimsy formulas and chicanery for Ancient Aliens.
But let's look at the high end of your data curve, and we see 9.2 to 9.3 inches. Does that seem equally as plausible to ANYONE here as the low end of 7.81 to 7.91?
Is there ANYONE here who honestly thinks those ends of the curve as equally plausible? Because in order for his average to result in 8.63, they would have to be equally plausible.
![nope.gif]()
Anyone who has watched any video with Mandingo at full erection would have enough sense already to realize that if they were looking at a picture, such as those screen caps selected by sdp for his supposedly "definitive" and "unbiased" research, in which Mandingo's dick appeared to be about 8.12 inches that it must surely not be a representative screen capture. I mean come the fuck on. It's so easy to see how fast and loose and selective anyone with a bias could be with these.
Are you beginning to grasp the absurdity of his findings?
Does it not begin to smack of bias?
I'd go as far as to say it reeks of propaganda the type which actively seeks the results it wants to fit the narrative, a form of confirmation bias if you will. Strong language to be sure, but what else have we got to argue on this forum?
Every measurement he takes requires a new estimation which he has approximated of his own hand (which interestingly enough he won't measure) then he projects that over his presumed average estimation of the female's hand width, naturally downsizing for average disparity in the hand width of the sexes - so we have different millimeter and different pixel counts for each image. He's doing this deliberately to keep nothing consistent.
But damningly, since all the approximations and extrapolations are wildly inconsistent, we never know if he is measuring first and then coming to a result, or if he has predetermined what he thinks sounds like a good result to him, and then measuring backwards to fit the result, assigning variable female hand width estimations in millimeters last. This is dubious methodology at best, and patently dishonest at worst.
![You+Cant+Handle+The+Truth.gif]()
So I'm sure most of you who bothered looking in at his "definitive" assessment to see the average result of his findings to date is 8.63 inches.
Yeah, you read that right! Not even 8 and 2/3 inches.
Originally I said it's laughable that he would contend Mandingo is closer to 8.5 inches than 9 inches.
But since then his dubious formula has seen a drop in the average. Now he's literally contending that Mandingo is by his best, most rigorous and extensively "researched" "formula", actually mathematically closer to 8.3 inches than it is to 9 inches.
![giphy.gif]()
![latest]()
I think we're done here
![9MOyQ.gif]()
TL;DR
How big do YOU think Mandingo's dick is? I have enough faith in this forum (however compromised as it may be by persistent trolls infiltrating with egos the size of Oceania which at all costs they will never set aside) that most people will be fair and honest, and that is all we should hope for.
This has been a Phenomenal Thought Provocation™ brought to you by Yours Truly
Alternate title, "The Definitive LPSG Community Analysis of Mandingo's Rod"
This isn't about what any jackass in particular thinks. Not me. Not you. But EVERYONE here.
SKIP TO THE TL;DR BELOW IF YOU'RE NOT INTERESTED IN DRAMA
This isn't about what any jackass in particular thinks. Not me. Not you. But EVERYONE here.
SKIP TO THE TL;DR BELOW IF YOU'RE NOT INTERESTED IN DRAMA
For laughs, how many of you actually believe that Mandingo is closer to 8.4" than he is to 9"? Because for a full pregnancy's term that is precisely what this sdp dude has been persistently determined to convince you of.
The overwhelming majority of his "findings" purport that Mandingo's dick is in the 8.3-8.9" range. Yeah that's right. I didn't typo. This dude actually has dozens -- scores even -- of assertions in his dubious thread which confidently estimate Mandingo around 8.5 inches - even more laughably, he has several where he so "scientifically" applies his patented "formula" to assert Mandingo's dick is around (and I quote) "7.92 inches"
Yeah. He honestly looks at some of those pics and thinks, Mandingo "realistically" looks about 8 and 1/8th inches. Or even shorter... Yeah, even shorter than 8 and 1/8th.
In fact, no less that 6 times he had the audacity to record and post for public viewing that he assessed Mandingo's dick to be LESS THAN 8 INCHES:
7.92"
7.98"
7.93"
7.92" - what AGAIN? YEP!
7.98" - from another scene altogether? YEP!
7.81"
Funny how those 7.92's and 7.98 duplicate findings showed up in different scenes with different women and different angles and different distances from the camera.
No. We've not been confused about the varying monikers of different porn performers. THE Mandingo. The guy whose very uncommon member, which is the subject of great furor throughout the adult entertainment industry, and given the very nature of this community, predictably the size of which is easily the most contentiously debated topic on LPSG, depicted here:
So I could see how someone may get the impression Mandingo's member is about 9 inches. I wouldn't even rule out estimations above that. While 9.5 may sound like a stretch, that's still just half an inch beyond what I believe most people would view as a realistic and conservative estimation of Mandingo's dick length.
But 8.12 inches?
8.15?
8.11?
8.08?
Are you serious? How are you even considering those into your data collection, professor? How are those not automatically ruled out? They are not even PLAUSIBLE to anyone with at least an elementary grasp of measurement and spatial perception.
I realize appearances can be deceiving, but we are not in a John Carpenter film and Mandingo is not an optical illusion. He penis is not a product of Industrial Light and Magic. He's not the world's first real-time interactive holographic humanoid indistinguishable from flesh and blood pornstars, as some have speculated.
How can you have such utter wholesale distrust of your very own eyes and those of virtually everyone else around you along with the testimonials of all those females who worked with Mandingo saying he was the largest they had ever seen?
I like to think of myself as a cynical bloke. But sometimes you can have a modicum of faith in your senses.
It's like your trying to tell us the Empire State Building does not exist. Look Galileo, WE CAN SEE IT WITH OUR OWN EYEBALLS.
Cuz right now sdp you're coming across as one of those "resident experts" called on to spin theoretical yarns as facts, cleverly engaging in sleight of hand to bamboozle a captive audience of yokels with flimsy formulas and chicanery for Ancient Aliens.
But let's look at the high end of your data curve, and we see 9.2 to 9.3 inches. Does that seem equally as plausible to ANYONE here as the low end of 7.81 to 7.91?
Is there ANYONE here who honestly thinks those ends of the curve as equally plausible? Because in order for his average to result in 8.63, they would have to be equally plausible.
Anyone who has watched any video with Mandingo at full erection would have enough sense already to realize that if they were looking at a picture, such as those screen caps selected by sdp for his supposedly "definitive" and "unbiased" research, in which Mandingo's dick appeared to be about 8.12 inches that it must surely not be a representative screen capture. I mean come the fuck on. It's so easy to see how fast and loose and selective anyone with a bias could be with these.
Are you beginning to grasp the absurdity of his findings?
Does it not begin to smack of bias?
I'd go as far as to say it reeks of propaganda the type which actively seeks the results it wants to fit the narrative, a form of confirmation bias if you will. Strong language to be sure, but what else have we got to argue on this forum?
Every measurement he takes requires a new estimation which he has approximated of his own hand (which interestingly enough he won't measure) then he projects that over his presumed average estimation of the female's hand width, naturally downsizing for average disparity in the hand width of the sexes - so we have different millimeter and different pixel counts for each image. He's doing this deliberately to keep nothing consistent.
But damningly, since all the approximations and extrapolations are wildly inconsistent, we never know if he is measuring first and then coming to a result, or if he has predetermined what he thinks sounds like a good result to him, and then measuring backwards to fit the result, assigning variable female hand width estimations in millimeters last. This is dubious methodology at best, and patently dishonest at worst.
So I'm sure most of you who bothered looking in at his "definitive" assessment to see the average result of his findings to date is 8.63 inches.
Yeah, you read that right! Not even 8 and 2/3 inches.
Originally I said it's laughable that he would contend Mandingo is closer to 8.5 inches than 9 inches.
But since then his dubious formula has seen a drop in the average. Now he's literally contending that Mandingo is by his best, most rigorous and extensively "researched" "formula", actually mathematically closer to 8.3 inches than it is to 9 inches.
I think we're done here
TL;DR
How big do YOU think Mandingo's dick is? I have enough faith in this forum (however compromised as it may be by persistent trolls infiltrating with egos the size of Oceania which at all costs they will never set aside) that most people will be fair and honest, and that is all we should hope for.
This has been a Phenomenal Thought Provocation™ brought to you by Yours Truly
