Erick Adame New York weatherman

[JoeRoscoe]

New article today at NBC News.com too, by Zachary Schermele, if we're not putting articles directly here and googling instead.

Interesting to see this evolve and see the angle take shape that he was only following city public health guidance by having virtual sex (though that doesn't line up with some of the allegations).

 

[dreamer20]

I give this thread another few hours at most before it's deleted.

I sincerely hope that this thread is not deleted. By leaving it here it serves as a cautionary thread to make persons wary of the possible perils that can occur when some unscrupulous person is viewing them via cam or gets hold of their nude photos here:

An email I got today, what would you do?

Black Mirror Blackmail Episode

Today I noticed a lenghty thread - which asked us which News anchor's penis would we like to see - had been mysteriously deleted. @LPSG-support would this have been due to someone posting images of Erick in it?

 

[JoeRoscoe]

It seems to me that the person who put the images on this site is not necessarily the same person who sent the images by email. Seems like his legal team should subpoena the email provider to get the sender's details, which is probably easier to figure out. Gmail at least requires a phone number to make a new account, I believe. I'm sure it's nothing they haven't thought about; just trying to piece it all together.

 

[Ryangh88]

He has job offers

That's a really good offer.

 

[cashmoney95]

Erick Adame likely wasn't fired for his nudes being distributed. He was likely fired because the nudes actually led to the curtain being pulled back on his exposure fetish, where he would voluntarily broadcast himself and reveal his real name on Chaturbate (a public cam site). This is the equivalent of willfully creating and distributing pornography. The "fired for nudes leaking by an anonymous hater" is a media spin. He was fired for everything that was discovered after.

 

[privatempls]

I feel bad for him. If does eventually file lawsuit against the person, that will be an ugly court battle. Exposure fetish & his recent MSNBC interview won't help his case.

 

[gimmedatquiche]

Well, so in that case, I don't think there's anything he can blame on LPSG. It's not as if the images hadn't been removed upon request. Would he sue Twitter had the pics been posted on tweets?


Why do you say that?

Look at cashmoney and curtains comments above. He was writing his name and occupation on his body with marker or pen. He admits he has an exposure fetish but writing obvious details and showing face was a big mistake especially if you are a public figure. And him being warned before is odd because wasn't it online for several years?

Sucks that he lost his job but there are rules.

 

[JoeRoscoe]

I feel bad for him. If does eventually file lawsuit against the person, that will be an ugly court battle. Exposure fetish & his recent MSNBC interview won't help his case.

Thanks for pointing me to the MSNBC interview, which I hadn't seen before and is now easily found on YouTube. A must-watch for anyone trying to understand all the angles.

 

[gimmedatquiche]

Now I'm hearing in one video he talked openly about wanting to have sex with a collegue?!

 

[curtain_swoosh]

EXCLUSIVE: Video contradicts privacy claim made by fired New York weatherman

 

[deleted4517461]

If the audio I heard was apart of the video that was sent to his (former) employer then I can see why they fired him. But that doesn't excuse it being sent to them or his mother at that. I'm curious as to how this will all play out.

 

[Wetdog1999]

He has job offers

$250k might be more than he was making haha could be a positive thing for him at this point.

 

[JoeRoscoe]

That wasn't a serious job offer.

 

[LPSG Support]

We want to keep this thread and discussion open but rules need to be followed.

1. Do not ask for the video or content of this person. If you want it please go to google and find it yourself. We do not want it here on LPSG.

2. Please do not victim blame. There is enough of that going on and we don't want that here.

Please respect these two requests. It is very important.

 

[jewcewerld]

I was disturbed by his statement that he is "getting professional help"... he doens't need professional help at all! He just needs to be able to engage in consensual adult activites without any issues in regards to his employment.

He's probably getting help because someone sent his mom and job his vids, not because he took the vids.

 

[mimoj13]

He's probably getting help because someone sent his mom and job his vids, not because he took the vids.

I think it's less that, and more the exposure/judgement (as ironic as that may seem) like the stigma of it all is something that won't ever go away. Like just look at this thread and others and the divide of if he was stupid, if it's a bad thing, should it have had the effect it did employment wise is all over the place. Like I feel it was all fine and dandy when he had control (or so he thought) over it all, and then it went off the rails, and the commentary began. I for one am team live and let live, but if you're salaried watch what you do personally bc it may have an adverse effect professionally. Like that's the downside of signing that dotted line, given I'm sure others here disagree.

 

[gimmedatquiche]

“At this point, I’m pretty sure my first name, last name, address, has all f––g been out there, and this p—y still hasn’t been f––d,” Adame says, The Desk reported.

The Desk noted during Adame’s livestream in December, he made comments about his boss.

“I think it’d be hot if my boss saw me,” he reportedly said. “I would love my boss to f–k me on camera.”

https://nypost.com/2022/10/04/ex-ny...-gave-out-personal-info-during-stream-report/

Unfortunately he doesn't have a case. You cannot do this stuff because when you sign a contract you are bound to it. Revealing this and talking openly about your boss is not professional.

 

[mimoj13]

“At this point, I’m pretty sure my first name, last name, address, has all f––g been out there, and this p—y still hasn’t been f––d,” Adame says, The Desk reported.

The Desk noted during Adame’s livestream in December, he made comments about his boss.

“I think it’d be hot if my boss saw me,” he reportedly said. “I would love my boss to f–k me on camera.”

https://nypost.com/2022/10/04/ex-ny...-gave-out-personal-info-during-stream-report/

Unfortunately he doesn't have a case. You cannot do this stuff because when you sign a contract you are bound to it. Revealing this and talking openly about your boss is not professional.

I agree I'm pretty sure they got him based on whatever was like n his morality clause, if not out right a social media one. Like where I work they fired one of our salaried managers for having an OF and she tried to argue it wasn't covered by the morality clause, so the fired her for violating our social media policy. Given I thought she was cool and could care less, but one of the reasons I left the salaried field

 

[oldmeaningoflife]

I agree I'm pretty sure they got him based on whatever was like n his morality clause, if not out right a social media one. Like where I work they fired one of our salaried managers for having an OF and she tried to argue it wasn't covered by the morality clause, so the fired her for violating our social media policy. Given I thought she was cool and could care less, but one of the reasons I left the salaried field

It sucks that people can't just completely separate their jobs from their personal lives.

 

[JoeRoscoe]

The standards are different when someone chooses to be in the public eye like that. Even then, it seems to me that NY1 was pretty reasonable (they were aware of the first cam stuff for months) until more cam incidents were sent to them. It totally sucks, and I do agree with your main point. It's just that I can see it from a broadcaster's point of view too.