Erik Rhodes cut

[B_Nicodemous]

Porn stars put their penis through a lot more than normal people. And an infection that puts him out of operation for a week could cost him a lot of money if he was due to shoot a movie that week.

When uncut, the glans and innerforeksin are easier penetration points for viri. And when you have sex with so many people, odds of catching something are higher.

And if his foreksin had tears, those tears would also be entry points for viri/bacteria.

Note that the picture of his recently cut dick can't be used to judge since it hadn't fully healed yet and was still swollen.

Gosh. If only there was something that he could have used to prevent viri/bacteria from coming into contact with his oh so permeable foreskin. Some kind of covering that would act as a barrier of sorts.

Oh wait they have those.

They are called condoms.

Now if his foreskin was tearing though, and it was just painful period, he could have seen about less invasive procedures to stretch it before getting cut. Or maybe look at the underlying causes as to why it was tight and tearing. Could have been a simple yeast infection. Or something more serious.

Sounds like maybe his doc needed to go from A to B instead of Z. Perhaps he (the doc) did, but it doesn't sound lie that based on the sample quote.

Either way his decision, and only he can tell us in time if it gets better.

 

[conor]

He was cut on the advice of a physician because his foreskin was starting to tear. I assume his foreskin was tight anyway and topping a tight guy when your foreskin could rip versus getting cut... pain now or later. I'd go for now, too

I am a doctor, and I cannot see any obvious phimosis; on the contrary, his foreskin seems to retact quite easily. What a waste of good foreskin; the result looks terrible:frown1:

 

[SirConcis]

If you look at Rocco Siffredi, most of his porn is when he was uncut. And his foreksin seemed to be fine and easily retractable. But something happened which changed this and he decided to get cut.

So when you look at porn for an actor, you may be watching movies shot years ago when he still had a working foreksin, but he has since developped problems after a movie which put him out of comission (hence not seen in any other movies).

You can't stretch a foreksin with tears. In fact, one of the primary rules of foreksin stretching is that it must be done gently enough to never cause any tears. The minute you have tears in a foreksin, stretching will make the tears worse and the foreksin shrink due to small scars in skin that cuase it to lose elasticity.

So it is possible that his problem couldn't be fixed with non surgical stuff. Perhaps he could have opted for a partial circumcisiuon if the foreksin damage was limited to the tip only, but few doctors recommend or do partial circs, which is why you very rarely see it in porn.

 

[danerain]

Uh, guys, he's kind of known for his self destructive tendencies and depression.

Maybe he thought this would be the something new to do instead of a giant bottle of GHB.

 

[Devken]

Whoah, there's a lot of warped information out there just to statisfy a crowd.

I hear people shout that you have 80% less chance of a certain type of cancer... which is fine and dandy, if that type of cancer wasn't so incredibly rare to begin with. If I chopped off your toes you'd have 100% less chance of getting cancer in one of your toes, or a grown in toe-nail.

People who really think getting cut will protect your from AIDS... those people should keel over dead. Circumcision won't sufficiently protect you from HIV, and if getting cut means you're going to stop using condoms, you don't deserve to live.

Also going by logic... the USA has one of the highest circumcision rates, and at the same time it has one of the highest HIV/AIDS rates of the Western World.
Africa, the continent where circumcision is performed regularly, is also the continent plagues by HIV/AIDS.

Quite frankly, if you're putting your faith in circumcision to not get one of the most devastating diseases, you're an idiot who should just stop breathing.

 

[deleted628524]

I am a doctor, and I cannot see any obvious phimosis; on the contrary, his foreskin seems to retact quite easily. What a waste of good foreskin; the result looks terrible:frown1:

Im so glad a 'doctor' has stepped forward and said that it was a WASTE of good foreskin.. TY


Sorry.. im a big believer that circumcision is barbaric unless its needed for medical reasons. If the male is at risk of death then please do the cut. Else wise let the kid decide when they get older and can make the decision about their body themselves.

 

[rickygNOLA]

the UC cock looks better to me, but that's just my opinion. however, i would like to see what it looks like after fully healing. if the 'cut' pic is supposed to show it healed, i would be one pissed-off man.

 

[gobigold]

My god! What did they cut it with? A plastic spoon??

Looked far better before

Assuming there was a medical condition that warranted he be cut, that was a decision made between him and his doctor. I'm not going to question that.

But - he really needs to sue the butcher who did him. Spoon? Looks more like a serrated knife to me. What a hack job. Very sad.