Evolution study- As human heads grew, so did human penises.

D_Tallie_Wacker

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Posts
101
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
53
As human heads grew, so did human penises

Esther Inglis-Arkell —
The reward for big brains may not be art, culture, comfort, or even basic survival. Instead, it may just be the development of larger penises.
zone: collapse
size: 300x600
keywords: origin=io9, visited=io9front

The great apes are bigger than humans in a lot of ways. A lot of them have overall size on us. Because they're not sitting around in swivel chairs all day they generally have bigger muscles. But there are at least two parts of the human body that surpass our ape cousins' in size: heads and penises. It turns out that these two things are not unrelated.


Tiny little chimp brains can be contained in tiny little chimp heads. And tiny little chimp heads can be easily birthed. As humans needed larger brains in order to acquire language, imagination, and the ability to learn, their heads needed to expand along with everything else. In order for large-headed human infants to come out of human females, the birth canals of human females needed to expand.


These expanded birth canals meant competition was on as to whose sperm could get to the end of it in order to do some impregnating. There are only a few ways to do this. Either super-charged sperm can race down the birth canal or regular sperm can be given a 'head start'. The larger heads of infants lead to larger birth canals, which in turn lead human males to have much larger penises than the great apes.


Just don't tell that to a silverback gorilla.


Originally found posted here io9. We come from the future.


So, what do you think of the theory?
 

bruce-san

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
153
That's an interesting idea. Seems plausible enough. I find more interesting why our brains began to expand in the first place.
 

MarkLondon

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Posts
1,911
Media
21
Likes
97
Points
193
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
It strikes me as a plausible hypothesis. Another consideration is our bipedalism, which I recall from reading Elaine Morgan's Descent of Woman back in the 1970s resulted in a change of position (and maybe length?) of the vagina.
 

PerfectlySexy

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Posts
263
Media
26
Likes
71
Points
273
Location
The Pacific Northwest
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
To answer the questions, yes this is plausible but no, it would not mean a correlation in individuals for head size and penis size (at least not in any noticeable way). And by plausible, I mean one should not discount alternative hypotheses. What if, for example, men developed larger penises to better compete with other men for fertilization and women's vaginas grew larger over time in response to that, thus leading to children with larger heads having increased survival rates... Ok, that doesn't sound as likely but it's good to stay open to possibilities.
 

B_subgirrl

Sexy Member
Joined
May 15, 2010
Posts
5,547
Media
0
Likes
34
Points
73
Location
NSW, Australia
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Last edited:

RawDog

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Posts
4,415
Media
17
Likes
243
Points
283
Location
Grinding the backstop (in Colorado)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I think the logic is sound. What could possibly further the research is by taking measurements within members of the same gene pool. Like several Dutch families and compare it with families from Borneo.
 
Last edited: