FACT: Obama's Middle Class Tax Cut Puny Compared to Bush's Tax Cut

[Trinity]

This thread is the lols. When unemployment for people making more than $150k is around 3% and it's more like 31% for the poor, who you gonna tax? Durrrr.

Nobody said tax the poor. You guys don't even know what you are talking about.

 

[B_talltpaguy]

^lolololol... Keep running in circles freakshow!

 

[mikeyh9in]

Trinity,

Not sure if you are old enough to remember, but we already tried your idea... Ronald Reagan and his cohorts called it Trickle Down Economics. Again, in case you don't remember... it didn't work.

-Mike

Nobody said tax the poor. You guys don't even know what you are talking about.

 

[Satsfakshun]

Sorry but if you are buying Obama's mess - you've been fooled. This is one of the best articles on Obama's Tax falsehoods and his economic polices that aren't working....

Amazing what facts a pro-greed think tank can come up with if they pay some economist several hundred thousand dollars to manufacture "facts."

Are these the same geniuses who came up with the 16,000 extra IRS agents to police healthcare?

I suppose we'll soon be hearing how securities reform will sour all the milk and kids will go hungry.

 

[JTalbain]

Not really.

Then refute them.

Do you even know what that means?

Not even you are that dense Trinity. If sales drop, need for workers and ability to pay for workers drop as well, and workers are laid off or their hours are cut. The reverse holds true as well; a sales increase will increase the need for workers and the ability to pay them increases, so more are hired and existing workers get more hours. An increase in sales = more money for businesses. Anyone that works in the service, manufacturing, or retail sectors of the economy knows this firsthand.

 

[D_Geffarde Phartsmeller]

Not even you are that dense Trinity. If sales drop, need for workers and ability to pay for workers drop as well, and workers are laid off or their hours are cut. The reverse holds true as well; a sales increase will increase the need for workers and the ability to pay them increases, so more are hired and existing workers get more hours. An increase in sales = more money for businesses. Anyone that works in the service, manufacturing, or retail sectors of the economy knows this firsthand.

Hmmm except for the whole "jobless recovery" thing. Surely you've heard that phrase tossed around recently. Companies don't need to re-hire employees now that things are better. They've found a magical way to keep operating expenses down and net sales up! Just have all the current employees work a little harder.

And that's exactly what they're doing because, well, this is America. We're loyal to money, not people.

 

[JTalbain]

Hmmm except for the whole "jobless recovery" thing. Surely you've heard that phrase tossed around recently. Companies don't need to re-hire employees now that things are better. They've found a magical way to keep operating expenses down and net sales up! Just have all the current employees work a little harder.

And that's exactly what they're doing because, well, this is America. We're loyal to money, not people.

I hope they like dealing with unions, then. They'll see a lot more of them in the future.

 

[TomCat84]

Bush's trillion dollar tax cut is a big reason (to say nothing about the invasion of Iraq) why the budget turned from a Clinton surplus into a deficit. It was reckless at best.

 

[Trinity]

Bush's trillion dollar tax cut is a big reason (to say nothing about the invasion of Iraq) why the budget turned from a Clinton surplus into a deficit. It was reckless at best.

Obama's economic policies of deficit spending is reckless and leading to over taxing everyone.

 

[B_OtterJoq]

Obama's economic policies of deficit spending is reckless and leading to over taxing everyone.

My taxes went down this year. Chances are, yours did too.

Why are you lying?

 

[JTalbain]

Obama's economic policies of deficit spending is reckless and leading to over taxing everyone.

Investments and restructuring in order to reduce costs are not reckless spending. By your logic, no one should ever borrow money in order to invest in a venture.

 

[B_talltpaguy]

^She's not operating on logic.

 

[Trinity]

Investments and restructuring in order to reduce costs are not reckless spending. By your logic, no one should ever borrow money in order to invest in a venture.

Obama's deficit spending is unsustainable and therefore reckless. Obama has not reduced costs. Obama, the Democrats and his supporters following blindly behind his madness are the ones who are illogical.

 

[B_talltpaguy]

^I see your 'repeat' button is still broken in the 'on' position.

lolololololol... You're such an adorably pathetic loser, I'm almost starting to look forward to your BS cluttering what might otherwise be an interesting subforum. It's especially cute how you always highlight new words that you recently learned and are apparently trying to blend into your writings for the first time. Hooked on Phonics really does work!