I warned him. He didn't listen. Now, I have to take action. :tongue:
I posted the comment below on one of his gallery pics, and as I suggested, he removed it. He put up another whole series with jumbo bulges, that he's taken down in the past 8 hours, probably, because like I did, others called him out on how these bulges don't match the rest of the gallery.
Here is the comment that I posted in Dec.:
***
Author
novice_btm
Registered: February 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6661
Thread (Comment)
Thu December 18, 2008 9:10am
OK, when you have *A* fake pic in your gallery. It puts the ENTIRE gallery into question. The original "zebra" (no "1") pic, didn't have this obviously manipulated bulge in it. The "stretch" function used to create the huge sack isn't working. So, I don't know if you're actually the blond guy in the pics, or just a fan with a lot of his pics, but having peripherally met the subject, and had an amazing view of it for a couple extended periods of time, I can vouch for the fact that he can go without this unfortunate and unnecessary enhancement. He (or perhaps, if you are the subject, I should even say 'You') already has a really nice package. I can produce the original, and go through a point-by-point of where the fakery occurs, but really, it'd just be easier if you removed this fake, and spare yourself the rabid mob that lives for trashing fakes, and will start analyzing every single pic you have posted in painful detail.
***
Here are the new pics that I'm talking about, and they're just the really easy, and ridiculously obvious ones.
Verification pic:
-A quick magnification of the image, shows that the tongue is pasted on, or heavily manipulated, by a distinct line, where the colour and texture change. The line of the original, is barely even sticking out
-I'm not sure that the cock should have shadows on BOTH sides, EVEN the side that the light source is coming from
-The cock also has the issue that in other pics, notably the "bedroom" series, the shaft here is thick, ending in a narrowing head, where the bedroom shots, the cock is distinctive with the shaft being thinner, and a massive knob on the end.
The "bedroom" series:
-The waistband changes from grey in one shot (pic 8104), with clear branding, to blurred white band, with no branding (pic 030), and fine, POSSIBLY a costume change, but more disturbingly, while the white "waistband" dips a bit, it's not enough (a personal tidbit, the subject knows enough about clothing that this shouldn't be a mistake that he would make), and the cock is still growing right out of the middle of it.
Look, if you're still in doubt, ask around. I have a long history of debunking fakes, and I could blow the pics all up, putting arrows and labels all over them, proving these issues, but I've already wasted enough time on items that are problematic to the naked eye. I have a proven track record on this. Enough of his pics are fakes, that I'm calling him a fake.
Again, the unfortunate part, is that I've actually met the subject of the pics, and he's a really nice guy, and in his original state, needs NO manipulation. He's handsome, has a great body, and an already impressive bulge.
I posted the comment below on one of his gallery pics, and as I suggested, he removed it. He put up another whole series with jumbo bulges, that he's taken down in the past 8 hours, probably, because like I did, others called him out on how these bulges don't match the rest of the gallery.
Here is the comment that I posted in Dec.:
***
Author
novice_btm
Registered: February 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6661
Thread (Comment)
Thu December 18, 2008 9:10am
OK, when you have *A* fake pic in your gallery. It puts the ENTIRE gallery into question. The original "zebra" (no "1") pic, didn't have this obviously manipulated bulge in it. The "stretch" function used to create the huge sack isn't working. So, I don't know if you're actually the blond guy in the pics, or just a fan with a lot of his pics, but having peripherally met the subject, and had an amazing view of it for a couple extended periods of time, I can vouch for the fact that he can go without this unfortunate and unnecessary enhancement. He (or perhaps, if you are the subject, I should even say 'You') already has a really nice package. I can produce the original, and go through a point-by-point of where the fakery occurs, but really, it'd just be easier if you removed this fake, and spare yourself the rabid mob that lives for trashing fakes, and will start analyzing every single pic you have posted in painful detail.
***
Here are the new pics that I'm talking about, and they're just the really easy, and ridiculously obvious ones.
Verification pic:
-A quick magnification of the image, shows that the tongue is pasted on, or heavily manipulated, by a distinct line, where the colour and texture change. The line of the original, is barely even sticking out
-I'm not sure that the cock should have shadows on BOTH sides, EVEN the side that the light source is coming from
-The cock also has the issue that in other pics, notably the "bedroom" series, the shaft here is thick, ending in a narrowing head, where the bedroom shots, the cock is distinctive with the shaft being thinner, and a massive knob on the end.
The "bedroom" series:
-The waistband changes from grey in one shot (pic 8104), with clear branding, to blurred white band, with no branding (pic 030), and fine, POSSIBLY a costume change, but more disturbingly, while the white "waistband" dips a bit, it's not enough (a personal tidbit, the subject knows enough about clothing that this shouldn't be a mistake that he would make), and the cock is still growing right out of the middle of it.
Look, if you're still in doubt, ask around. I have a long history of debunking fakes, and I could blow the pics all up, putting arrows and labels all over them, proving these issues, but I've already wasted enough time on items that are problematic to the naked eye. I have a proven track record on this. Enough of his pics are fakes, that I'm calling him a fake.
Again, the unfortunate part, is that I've actually met the subject of the pics, and he's a really nice guy, and in his original state, needs NO manipulation. He's handsome, has a great body, and an already impressive bulge.
