I agree. His threads are creepy in that they walk a thin line between incest and pederast.please.. i'm BEGGING you... don't start another one of these threads
If I had sons, I would not want them circumcised. I see no reason for it.
My father was uncut but my brothers and I were cut. I had my son's cut but my grandsons are uncut. Personally, uncut is the way to go, why alter what nature has provided for our pleasure and protection.
I'm cut and my kids, if I ever had any, would be cut as well. I'm glad I was cut and never think about what it might be like to have foreskin. I know that it's a constant debate in the US and will probably go on forever. I grew up in the US and live in Europe for 15 years. When I first moved here meeting an uncut guy was sort of mysterious and seems to be one reason why gay American men come to Europe - to meet the uncut guy of their dreams. Many of these same guys become anti-circ nazis always bashing circumcision, trying to restore what they lost. Calling it mutilation, etc. But it was one bad experience after another for me and I tired of them quickly. One guy could not pull his foreskin back and started bleeding while we had sex. The condom had blood in it, which scared the crap out of me. Others just smelled terrible. One guy got in my bed and reeked of piss. I asked him to take a shower and he came back STILL smelling of piss. My current BF, although I love him dearly, always has a problem with the smell although he showers regularly. I see him pissing and not pulling his skin back and then not shaking or milking it to get those last drops. He comes to bed and it's a turn-off smelling piss. I see guys pissing in public urinals doing the same - not pulling back his skin. I wonder, after a long hot day, what he smells like when he gets home to his wife or girlfriend or boy friend. In any case, I'd give anything to meet a cut guy here.
I see guys pissing in public urinals doing the same - not pulling back his skin.
I agree I'm cut, which was pretty much the standard in the Midwest (Indiana) in the early 80's when I was born, and probably still is, I don't know. I didn't see an uncut till possibly one day in the pool showers on the last day of the semester, but I'm not sure if I saw one or not, so it's possible that I've never yet seen an uncut one, and I know I've not yet seen one up close in person.
If you are against circ, why did you have your son's cut?
Were you part of the reason as to why your grandsons are uncut? or did the parents just decide this was best on their own even though the father of the baby is cut?
I won't jump into the debate one way or the other because I think my parents did what they felt was best at the time but it seems to me that it would be common sense to pull it back when taking a leak. Maybe that is the 1st thing parents should tell their sons to do?
The trouble with suggesting that boys should be taught to pull the skin back is that the foreskin is actually attached to the glans. Hygiene isn't really a problem before separation because the urine just comes straight out and doesn't go round the head. Foreskin separation usually happens when the boy begins to masturbate although it often separates before then and can be quite uncomfortable. I still remember when mine separated. After separation, feel free to tell them to pull the skin back, but before then, leave it alone.