Originally posted by lighthouse+Sep 22 2004, 03:21 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lighthouse @ Sep 22 2004, 03:21 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Hung Muscle@Sep 22 2004, 02:28 PM
He's gross
[post=257035]Quoted post[/post]
It's good that porn has advanced to the point that guys now need to be both hung and hot. Old straight porn is lame because the chick was perhaps marginally hot, but the guys were always trolls. I think some porn producers would only use nasty guys (R. Jeremy) so as not to intimidate the audience in the appearance departments. " if a guy that ugly can get a hot chick like that, perhaps I can too."
Nacho Vidal definitely gets my attention.
[post=257044]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]
Gosh.
I agree with you.
I am in my middle thirties,
and i remember when guys (movie stars or porn stars) didn't *have* to be hot, built models
to be found attractive.
But, even in those days, Ron Jeremy would not have
been considered attractive by anyone i know/knew (sorry,
just an opinion, if you disagree, its all good).
But, yes, i agree,
I think there was a level of, "wow, he is just
like me" rather than,
"wow, i can't live up to *that*"
which was kind of nice.