FCC up to their same old bag of tricks

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
faceking said:
Fucking name them. And give us the break down... since we're seemingly so adept at disclosure here...

Nobody owes you a disclosure of their views, if they choose to, that is their business not yours. I don't even fucking know you, why are you baiting me all of a sudden? You've been here for a long time, but only recently started posting and clearly are putting effort into pissing me off. I don't care about you enough to get pissed of, so find some new hobbies (or don't, I really am an attention whore).

Try to get some perspective on where you are and how ridiculous you look acting like the gestapo on a dick site.
It ain't anybody else's fault you're ugly.
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
faceking said:
Talk about f'ing calling it.... see all of Zora, Stronzo, Matthew, post and all the um... "moderators" of said board.
if you don't like it, go someplace else.

say, ain't that just what you banana-republicans keep telling those of us who criticize your government? :biggrin1:
 

Lex

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8,253
Media
0
Likes
118
Points
268
Location
In Your Darkest Thoughts and Dreams
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
faceking said:
Fucking name them. And give us the break down... since we're seemingly so adept at disclosure here...

I am sure that if they felt the need to join you in your views on certain matters and certain threads they would. I guess they feel differently, which gives me hope for a lot of people.
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I have no party affiliation.

some valid points made on both sides here.

just wanted to pop in and point out that, even though the Republican party has lately been hijacked somewhat by religious nutjob "moral majority" types and facist big-brother Neo-Cons; traditionally, and historically, protecting the right of free speech has been more of a conservative issue, while making sure everyone uses politically-correct pronouns, while blaming things like naughty stuff in video games, movies and Eminem for all of society's ills (and then trying to exert control over said media) has been more of a liberal one... even though Joe Lieberman and Tipper Gore would have an ally in Bill O'Reilly on this one particular issue.

In today's political and social climate, the true allies of free speech and expression continue to dwindle.
 

Lex

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8,253
Media
0
Likes
118
Points
268
Location
In Your Darkest Thoughts and Dreams
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
As I said, Freedom of Speech/Press and Environmental Issues should not be a part of partisan politics. But as we know, if there is a dime to be made or billions to be lost, it will be so. Common sense would dictate that we be kind and thoughtful to the environment, and few could argue that point until you get billion dollar companies trying to resist the costs encurred by changing, or that see their ability to control messages/broadcasts, or who see the potential porfit in riding the crest of the environmental wave. The money on both sides is dirty. No question.

Remember a long time ago when some companies wanted to make paper products out of hemp becasue you can make 5X the paper with hemp as you can with trees? Businesses and factions blocked it for bad values, etc. How can saving trees be bad at the cost of growing marijuana (which, last I recalled, was a naturally occuring plant on our planet). I meanm, we seize hmep farms all the time--how about using those seizures for environmental good rather than just burning it to make a point?

Money has long ago currupted our system at levels that many are not even aware. On all sides.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
NineInchCock_160IQ said:
I have no party affiliation.

some valid points made on both sides here.

just wanted to pop in and point out that, even though the Republican party has lately been hijacked somewhat by religious nutjob "moral majority" types and facist big-brother Neo-Cons; traditionally, and historically, protecting the right of free speech has been more of a conservative issue, while making sure everyone uses politically-correct pronouns, while blaming things like naughty stuff in video games, movies and Eminem for all of society's ills (and then trying to exert control over said media) has been more of a liberal one... even though Joe Lieberman and Tipper Gore would have an ally in Bill O'Reilly on this one particular issue.

In today's political and social climate, the true allies of free speech and expression continue to dwindle.

I agree with you, and that's honestly the point. Plenty of us support things that have in the past been primarily conservative issues, it's just that the Republican party has been so damaged by this unholy alliance with the fundamentalist movement that it can't really be considered by it's merits of the past. I get called a leftist, but I'm really a centrist. This administration doesn't want to admit that centrists exist, but that's how you'd describe an ideology that's financially conservative and socially permissive. This admistration bears absolutely no resemblance to the Republican party of earlier years, other than in it's earlier moments of corruption.

What we have now is a fascist goverment with a dictator who doesn't respect the law or even acknowledge anyone's rights beyond his own. The fact that he AS THE PRESIDENT argues to limit free speech by censoring the press, detaining without arrest people he doesn't want attending his speeches, and anyone HE PERSONALLY declares a "terrrrrrrist"- well kiddliewinkies, THAT'S a dicktator. Without the taters.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Oh, Congress can't, but I reckon the prez CAN.
 

Lex

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8,253
Media
0
Likes
118
Points
268
Location
In Your Darkest Thoughts and Dreams
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
madame_zora said:
... I get called a leftist, but I'm really a centrist. This administration doesn't want to admit that centrists exist, but that's how you'd describe an ideology that's financially conservative and socially permissive...

I am here with you, Zora. See also, Moderate (which is really what Clinton was). There are people who can see both yards on either side of the fence at once and who pick and chose from which side they stand on an issue by issue basis, founded upon which yard makes the most sense given the issue at hand.

This is not flip-flopping as Kerry was labeled, but careful thinking. Some issues require a more conservate perspective while others do not. I don't accept that all my choices have to come from the Liberal menu because I have a lot of liberal views. That would be silly.
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Lex said:
I am here with you, Zora. See also, Moderate (which is really what Clinton was). There are people who can see both yards on either side of the fence at once and who pick and chose from which side they stand on an issue by issue basis, founded upon which yard makes the most sense given the issue at hand.

This is not flip-flopping as Kerry was labeled, but careful thinking. Some issues require a more conservate perspective while others do not. I don't accept that all my choices have to come from the Liberal menu because I have a lot of liberal views. That would be silly.
Heheh, right... not to mention that if I do something that may appear inconsistent, I'm "adjusting my strategies." If you do something that may appear inconsistent, you are "flip-flopping." If I stupidly refuse to adapt, I'm "staying the course." If you stupidly refuse to adapt, you are "inflexible and out of touch."

Of course, the FCC issue, I'm sure, is closely tied with another issue in another thread, and easily traceable to the political appointees involved.