- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Posts
- 463
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 8
- Points
- 103
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I've enjoyed some of the stories in the Fictitious Stories section, but there are some elements that are used fairly regularly in some stories that ruin the story for me. I'm wondering if others feel the same way, and maybe we can persuade some of the authors to move away from those elements.
1. The implausibly huge cock. There is no shortage of threads at LPSG that have discussed and demonstrated how implausible an 11" or 12" penis is. Sure, there may be some freakshow out there sporting a foot long cock, but it's likely that he has trouble getting a full hard on, unlike the foot long cock having studs in the stories who are capable of pounding nails with their erections.
Let's not even get into the implausibility of this guy having a couple of buddies who also have foot long cocks.
For me at least, when I read a story and the guy has an 11 or 12" cock, the story loses its connection to reality, and much of the appeal of the stories is that what they describe can actually happen in real life, so once an implausible element is introduced, that appeal is lost.
2. The tireless stud who has no refractory period. OK, some dude out there can cum, stay hard and keep fucking. But most of us can't relate to that at all. And while sometimes the stud has a refractory period, it is very short and never seems to get longer, even after cumming two or three times. Seriously?
3. The stud whose body must be 80% semen. You know what I'm talking about. The guy shoots 7 ropes, totally covering her face, on his THIRD ejaculation of the night.
I guess some have a preference for these stories involving sexual supermen. For me, it's total comic book stuff and of little appeal. I'd find the stories more appealing with a stud who is actually human, albeit a little bigger and better than most.
I suppose an analogy would be how some guys like Superman's character (super-human), while others prefer Batman (uber-human).
I'd be interested in hearing what others think...
1. The implausibly huge cock. There is no shortage of threads at LPSG that have discussed and demonstrated how implausible an 11" or 12" penis is. Sure, there may be some freakshow out there sporting a foot long cock, but it's likely that he has trouble getting a full hard on, unlike the foot long cock having studs in the stories who are capable of pounding nails with their erections.
Let's not even get into the implausibility of this guy having a couple of buddies who also have foot long cocks.
For me at least, when I read a story and the guy has an 11 or 12" cock, the story loses its connection to reality, and much of the appeal of the stories is that what they describe can actually happen in real life, so once an implausible element is introduced, that appeal is lost.
2. The tireless stud who has no refractory period. OK, some dude out there can cum, stay hard and keep fucking. But most of us can't relate to that at all. And while sometimes the stud has a refractory period, it is very short and never seems to get longer, even after cumming two or three times. Seriously?
3. The stud whose body must be 80% semen. You know what I'm talking about. The guy shoots 7 ropes, totally covering her face, on his THIRD ejaculation of the night.
I guess some have a preference for these stories involving sexual supermen. For me, it's total comic book stuff and of little appeal. I'd find the stories more appealing with a stud who is actually human, albeit a little bigger and better than most.
I suppose an analogy would be how some guys like Superman's character (super-human), while others prefer Batman (uber-human).
I'd be interested in hearing what others think...
Last edited: