finally, some GOOD news

KinkGuy

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Posts
2,794
Media
0
Likes
157
Points
268
Age
70
Location
southwest US
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male

Mighty Joe

Experimental Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
228
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
238
Age
34
Just my opinion BUT Rehnquist should have resigned months ago because of his health. I also don't believe anyone should be appointed for life.
 

Dr. Dilznick

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Posts
1,640
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
183
Age
46
Sexuality
No Response
Bush: List for Second Vacancy 'Wide Open'

By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 7 minutes ago


WASHINGTON -
President Bush said the list of possibilities for his second Supreme Court nomination was "wide open" Tuesday as Senate Republicans urged him to consider a woman and Democrats pressed him to consult with them before making his next pick.

The president said the Senate should concentrate on confirming U.S. Appeals Judge John Roberts to replace the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist before worrying about any other choices.

"I want the Senate to focus not on who the next nominee is going to be, but the nominee I got up there now," Bush said.

Roberts' confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin next Monday, one week after Bush named him to replace the justice he worked for as a Supreme Court law clerk. Roberts was originally slated to be
Sandra Day O'Connor's replacement, but Bush formally withdrew that nomination Tuesday and made the 50-year-old judge the chief justice nominee.

O'Connor has agreed to stay on until her successor is in place, Bush noted, ensuring there will be a nine-member court if Roberts is confirmed before the new term begins on Oct. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Judiciary chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said they expected to be finished with Roberts before then.

Specter and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (news, bio, voting record) of Texas — who will be the Senate's No. 3 Republican next year — said Bush should choose a woman since O'Connor's retirement would leave only one woman on the court,
Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

"Two women, I think, are a minimum," Specter said.

Several senators suggested the president should wait before making any new selection public, given that the Senate is working on relief for the hurricane-stricken Gulf Coast as well as Roberts' nomination. "We've got more than a full plate right now," said John Cornyn, R-Texas.

"I think you should do one nomination at a time, even though it would be nice to know who the president is thinking of," added Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y.

Democrats urged Bush to talk with them before replacing O'Connor, who sometimes has sided with more liberal justices.

"The list is wide open, which should create some good speculation here in Washington," Bush said, playfully glancing at Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee. If named, Gonzales would become the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court.
 

B_caneadea

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Posts
723
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
163
Location
San Francisco
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm not superstitious. I'll be glad to spit on Rehnquist's grave. Puh-TOOY! That said......Even though I'm a liberal Democrat, I think Chief Justice Roberts will be okay. I predict that he will grow more liberal with time.
The HUGE problem will be Sandie Oconner's replacement. She pulled the fat out of the fire more than once in some crucial 5 to 4 decisions. And I don't expect "Shrub" will replace her with anyone who would benefit the general public.:confused: