Because it's a standard trick of the gun-control crowd. If one wants to "prove" that the homicide rate in the US is grotesquely high, one has to find a way to exclude countries like Mexico and Russia. To leave out Mexico, quote figures for the "developed" world. To leave out Russia, work "western" in there somehow. And to try to correlate the presence of guns with the homicide rate, it's necessary to exclude countries awash with guns, like Israel and Switzerland - hence the routine obfuscation between "possession" and "ownership".
No tricks and I've better ways to spend my time than in a pissing contest over gun ownership stats. I merely cited stats for Finland, the US and the UK to illustrate that (in the case of Finland) high firearms ownership need not
necessarily lead to high firearms homicide rates. But that in the US it
tends to whereas in Finland it tends
not to.
One can draw whatever infrerences one chooses to support whatever agenda one has. The statistics show more people in the US use firearms to kill (as a % of all homicides) than they do in Finland, for the Finnish firearm ownership rate.
The causes for that disparity will doubtless be many and varied. Mexico and Switzerland are not relevant other than to make the point
you want or to extend the comparative analysis that having guns doesn't necessarily lead to high homicide rates. I don't disagree that Mexico's homicide rate is higher than the US, it's three times higher. Why not include Russia, it's not far of twice that of Mexico. I think you missed my point, by some considerable margin.
I didn't state my position, you inferred it. As it happens, you're broadly correct - I'm opposed to private gun owneship as a matter of principle, and believe that in the US a gun 'culture' is a major factor in high rates of firearms homicides. If I have a closed mind to other considerations, otherwise I would have chosen a better example nation than Finland which tends to support your postition (just in case you missed it), wouldn't I?
I try to keep an open mind and will consider that many factors may be at play when it comes to the different national relationships between gun ownership, gun control legislation and gun crime. Do you have an open mind on that issue? I ask because it doesn't sound much like it.
Muddying the waters by including other (quite plainly) homicidal nations is a common diversionary agument used by the pro gun lobby.
Oh yes, on the stats; if you dispute their accuracy fine, in which case may I suggest you provide alternatives.