*drools* I'm a part-time, volunteer bra. Just thought I'd mention that.You are lucky Ellie!
I don't run anywhere unless it's an emergency.
There has yet been a bra made that will tether these puppies and stop them from blacking my eyes if I tried.
*drools* I'm a part-time, volunteer bra. Just thought I'd mention that.You are lucky Ellie!
I don't run anywhere unless it's an emergency.
There has yet been a bra made that will tether these puppies and stop them from blacking my eyes if I tried.
*drools* I'm a part-time, volunteer bra. Just thought I'd mention that.
That's the kind of guy I am - generous to a fault. This is a support group, afterall!The "Girls" and myself appreciate your support, MoT! *giggle*:biggrin1:
I'll give you an example. If I saw a woman on the street naked, I wouldn't feel the need to grope her - would you? You choose how to react to a situation. There are creepy people around, yes - for that reason I wouldn't recommend walking around naked. But, the point is - in an ideal world they should be able to, without risk of abuse. It's the second person, (the groper) that is responsible. That person chose to act in such a way. To say that the first person is 'absolutely to blame' is just silly. But what do I know? I'm just an idealist. Don't be stupid, watermelon. :tongue: (< Sorry - couldn't resist.)This is so stupid. People who dress provocatively are absolutely to blame for what happens to them. Why? The whole situation is just so fucking stupid and devoid of character. Sure, it might be innapropriate for someone to stare vigorously or god forbid actualy violate some of these dumb wenches who dress provocatively, but also these women who dress provocatively are most likely horrible people who have poor character. Poor character enough to dress like something that obviously puts an object- their body- forward BEFORE their actions as a person. So these people are either just dumb or they are actually seriously putting that shit out there for real, playing a certain hand. The hand that says they're hot shit? The hand that lets their personal life ooze off them? No doubt their beauty is a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge factor in their self esteem. And then they get offended when this all washes up in some sort of argument. Jesus. These people are simply dumb. Get real, take some fucking responsibility. It is completely possible to wear a type of feminimity that is both decent and attractive. The question isn't if you have a right to dress how you would like, the question is what fuck are you thinking about when you dress in the first place?
This is so stupid. People who dress provocatively are absolutely to blame for what happens to them. Why? The whole situation is just so fucking stupid and devoid of character. Sure, it might be innapropriate for someone to stare vigorously or god forbid actualy violate some of these dumb wenches who dress provocatively, but also these women who dress provocatively are most likely horrible people who have poor character. Poor character enough to dress like something that obviously puts an object- their body- forward BEFORE their actions as a person. So these people are either just dumb or they are actually seriously putting that shit out there for real, playing a certain hand. The hand that says they're hot shit? The hand that lets their personal life ooze off them? No doubt their beauty is a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge factor in their self esteem. And then they get offended when this all washes up in some sort of argument. Jesus. These people are simply dumb. Get real, take some fucking responsibility. It is completely possible to wear a type of feminimity that is both decent and attractive. The question isn't if you have a right to dress how you would like, the question is what fuck are you thinking about when you dress in the first place?
This is so stupid. People who dress provocatively are absolutely to blame for what happens to them. Why? The whole situation is just so fucking stupid and devoid of character. Sure, it might be innapropriate for someone to stare vigorously or god forbid actualy violate some of these dumb wenches who dress provocatively, but also these women who dress provocatively are most likely horrible people who have poor character. Poor character enough to dress like something that obviously puts an object- their body- forward BEFORE their actions as a person. So these people are either just dumb or they are actually seriously putting that shit out there for real, playing a certain hand. The hand that says they're hot shit? The hand that lets their personal life ooze off them? No doubt their beauty is a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge factor in their self esteem. And then they get offended when this all washes up in some sort of argument. Jesus. These people are simply dumb. Get real, take some fucking responsibility. It is completely possible to wear a type of feminimity that is both decent and attractive. The question isn't if you have a right to dress how you would like, the question is what fuck are you thinking about when you dress in the first place?
Please explain molested....were you touched???I have been molested on the subway wearing overalls, a baggy t-shirt, and closed-toe, flat sandals. Essentially, dressed like a hobo-farmer. My tits are huge. Leaving my house is provocative. Should I be raped on every corner? (Try it. I carry a stun gun that puts out over 2 million volts. I would love to find out what fried evil smells like.)
are you going to wank to it if she was?Please explain molested....were you touched???
Please explain molested....were you touched???
Absurd! How is a man wanting attention from women gay?
that's the lamest theory ever.Since you responded and I didn't see it...
The context of the OP and a guy saying "I'm starved for attention from women!" is what I like to call 'fake straight'. It sounds like the person is hiding something if they put it in that kind of context.
It's going over the top to 'prove' you are straight.![]()
that's the lamest theory ever.
or it's a theory i understand and still think lame.Or it's just a theory that you don't understand...