My father (circumcised) didnt want us hurt so he said not to circumcise us. My mom was for it. I really, really wish it had been done at birth so I would not have to do it at my age which is happening next week.
For USA born Uncut males only. Why were you left uncut?
- Thread starter Uncutsouthernboy
- Start date
My SO (S.O.?) was born at his home in the country with assistance from a "midwife" and was cut. Same with three older brothers of his.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Posts
- 49
- Media
- 11
- Likes
- 35
- Points
- 193
- Location
- City of Angels, California
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Then don't do it. I am not necessarily against adult circ, I just think it is misinformed and tragic. It is almost never medically necessary. It is cultural.
Want less dick? Try circumcision.
Mixed German heritage here.... was told by my Pop that its a familly tradition....my pop is uncut, his pop uncut etc.... grandad once asked me about my sons (they are both uncut) my brother/nephew are uncut... My son tells me he is seeing more uncuts...(showers, school, etc)
Even had a discussion with my late wife when she, we? got pregnant...uncut. period. (she later told me fine, but she could use that 'card' later (ie 'no discussion).
Everyone get/give the good ol' 'peel it back, keep it clean' speach?
Even had a discussion with my late wife when she, we? got pregnant...uncut. period. (she later told me fine, but she could use that 'card' later (ie 'no discussion).
Everyone get/give the good ol' 'peel it back, keep it clean' speach?
yes, I got the "good ol' peel it back keep it clean" speech.
I remember a boy at school. It was 2nd or 3rd grade talking about his dick. He said he had to keep it washed because the stuff that got on it was poisonous. He got the speech too.
I remember a boy at school. It was 2nd or 3rd grade talking about his dick. He said he had to keep it washed because the stuff that got on it was poisonous. He got the speech too.
Yes, U.S. circ culture rears its ugly head.
No, I would say that his daddy told him that to make sure that he would wash his dick.
[Uncutsouthernboy:] I remember a boy at school. It was 2nd or 3rd grade talking about his dick. He said he had to keep it washed because the stuff that got on it was poisonous. He got the speech too.[/quote]
It doesn't seem totally implausible that the boy's father told him that "the stuff...was poisonous" just to ensure that he washed under his foreskin. But given the widespread myth then, and even today, that smegma is somehow harmful seems to make it more likely that the father actually believed what he was saying. While it is indeed imperative to keep the glans and inner foreskin clean, it is now scientifically established that smegma is actually one of the body's first-line defenses: it's a natural antibacterial agent.
It doesn't seem totally implausible that the boy's father told him that "the stuff...was poisonous" just to ensure that he washed under his foreskin. But given the widespread myth then, and even today, that smegma is somehow harmful seems to make it more likely that the father actually believed what he was saying. While it is indeed imperative to keep the glans and inner foreskin clean, it is now scientifically established that smegma is actually one of the body's first-line defenses: it's a natural antibacterial agent.
Last edited:
elevenandb
Experimental Member
...my parents/grandparents aren't american - i was born here tho'...
I didn't know the few extra inches of useless skin hanging at the end of your cock counted towards your measurement.
U.S. circ culture again. There is no "useless" tissue anywhere on the human body.I didn't know the few extra inches of useless skin hanging at the end of your cock counted towards your measurement.
I didn't know the few extra inches of useless skin hanging at the end of your cock counted towards your measurement.
Like the appendix absolutely useless. No proven value. In fact it actually may be a hindrance.
Circumcision Is Found to Curb Two S.T.D.s
ok so the study says that cut men are 25% less likely to get an STD. BFD
even if you buy into this bullshit study, that means a cut dude is still 75% AS likely to get an STD as a dude who is UNCUT.
does improving your odds against an STD by 25% mean you can fuk anything you want with unchecked and unprotected sex?
does getting cut improve the odds enuff to make rampant promiscuity and bareback sex an acceptable risk?
HEY CUT GUYS, NOW HEAR THIS:
ur immune to STDs, throw ur rubbers away, go ahead and fuk that crank whore on the corner. have all the unprotected gay anal sex u want, ur safe now.
i know with all that unprotected sex your time is limited, but if u read the whole article instead of just the headline:
they proved it with a study that even the authors admit has fundamental flaws: the test subjects were self selected and might have been less prone to infection in the first place! another example that ANY INEREST can design a study with a predetermined outcome.
D_Rod Staffinbone
Account Disabled
i was uncut till i was 7 (in 2nd grade). my grandfather (my dad's dad) was from a line from the uk.
none of them were cut.
i was an air force brat and guess i got a urinary infection of some sort. the doctor
at the base said "cut him". his thinking was that would help in the future. the antibiotics had cleared up the infection before the circumcision. usually those doctors were usually pretty good and the health care was all free, so my dad went along with it.
i think if it would have cost a lot my dad would have fought it tooth and nail.
i live with it, doesn't seem to have held me back, but i always wonder what i'm missing, since
this all happen before puberty.
none of them were cut.
i was an air force brat and guess i got a urinary infection of some sort. the doctor
at the base said "cut him". his thinking was that would help in the future. the antibiotics had cleared up the infection before the circumcision. usually those doctors were usually pretty good and the health care was all free, so my dad went along with it.
i think if it would have cost a lot my dad would have fought it tooth and nail.
i live with it, doesn't seem to have held me back, but i always wonder what i'm missing, since
this all happen before puberty.
My my me thinks doth does protest too much. I believe you are attempting to shot the messenger as you have eroticized the foreskin to the point that no information contrary is instantly annihilated. Thankfully science doesn't work that way. Maybe one day your work will be published but until then you have no grounds.
i think u have seperation anxiety over the loss of your foreskin. otherwise u wouldn't bitterly lash out and declare all of them useless. I'm guessing u no longer have an appendix either.
i quoted the SCIENCE from the article YOU referenced and posted a link to. it doesnt' sound like you even read it, just saw the catchy headline and went with it.
if you're gonna use "published" "science" to support your position, you can't edit out the parts you don't like,
but it looks like that's the way you operate since you edited my post to remove all the points i made that you can't refute.
there is none so blind as he who will not see.
and while you're in ur bunker reading those "published" medical studies, maybe you should go back and review the one that gave Ice pick labotomies glowing support, and the one that recommended eating transfat margarine instead of butter to prevent heart disease.
inter office memo between the CDC and AMA: (oops, maybe nobody will remember those) but now we're making a FORTUNE on lipitor to manage the disease we created with the margarine recommondation we botched in the first place. woo hoo! remember the oath: do no harm! (to the accounting dept)
the medical establishment is littered with horrendously bad "science" that was "published" to promote an agenda that has NOTHING to do with health. ever hear of pregnant women given thalidomide? mercury pills for syphillis? there's not enuff space on this site to list them all.
Last edited:
You've cherry picked your way through the article picking out 'weaknesses' and then inflate those 'weaknesses' to the point you can render the study and all others on the matter or to your choosing useless. And then you go to the kitchen and through everything you can at medical science. Where's the sink? Or did you throw that already?
Still, considering the results of their own and previous studies, the researchers conclude that circumcision should now be accepted as an effective intervention for H.S.V.-2 and H.P.V. prevention
The foreskin still useless and you can't prove otherwise.
Last edited by a moderator:
if you had one nobody would have to prove it to you,
you'd know for yourself that it wasn't useless.
but go ahead and believe what u need to in order to subsume your loss.
Similar threads
