There's been quite a few Topics on foreskin and to "have or have not" ideals etc. I have one (both Dicks do). Each of us had foreskin related problems during childhood, puberty and into early adulthood, but these resolved themselves, in due course. Personally speaking, there have been many times I've hated my foreskin and my parents' lack of foresight in not having me circumcised as a child. Now, I'm quite happy with it. Especially as it can tucked behind the head and remains there, thereby giving the impression of my being "cut". The thing is - I far and away prefer the look of my cock when the head is fully exposed. Plus - Every partner I've ever been with has wasted no time in pulling the skin behind the glans in order to expose the head, pretty much as soon as they've gotten their hands on it and especially when administering oral sex. Given the number of claims made on LPSG of folk claiming to prefer cut over uncut cocks, I might be forgiven for expecting the gallery pics featuring my little soldier in his "uncut glory" to receive more (and better) ratings. In fact, the prompt for this topic is that, whilst checking our own gallery out, I noticed (almost subliminally, at first) that generally speaking, those pics with the head fully exposed have actually been rated more than the few of those showing foreskin - these receiving few (if any at all) ratings. As said earlier I, too, prefer to see Old Faithful in all his fully exposed glory, but found this observation surprising at the same time. Do I/we/you/they just fool ourselves into thinking an uncut cock is desireable?