- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Posts
- 2,246
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,395
- Points
- 443
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 60% Straight, 40% Gay
- Gender
- Male
this might sound like an insult (at first) I'm not sure- so listen to the intent and not the exact phrasing:
Since I have my choice, I say leave the foreskin forward to cover that head. Why? Well, a few of us didn't have a choice to keep ours, so I think you should revel in your extra sensitive skin, and your long foreskin covering your head is cool... and
if you compare a cut to an uncut dick, it seems like a cut dick has a classic look, and an uncut dick has a classic look. Uncut retracted almost looks 'too juicy' because it's so pink and well shielded from becoming a bit calloused. Only as compared to the 'classic' look of a foreskinned cock, this makes the pulled back head second-best to the foreskin covering.
Said another way, the uncovered head isn't for pictures, it's for licking. Hows that?
Since I have my choice, I say leave the foreskin forward to cover that head. Why? Well, a few of us didn't have a choice to keep ours, so I think you should revel in your extra sensitive skin, and your long foreskin covering your head is cool... and
if you compare a cut to an uncut dick, it seems like a cut dick has a classic look, and an uncut dick has a classic look. Uncut retracted almost looks 'too juicy' because it's so pink and well shielded from becoming a bit calloused. Only as compared to the 'classic' look of a foreskinned cock, this makes the pulled back head second-best to the foreskin covering.
Said another way, the uncovered head isn't for pictures, it's for licking. Hows that?
