AussieSchlongDomination
Experimental Member
Interesting concept i have actually never heard of this but will look into it, i was circumsised as a baby, and i wanna know what its like to have one
Well its really worth doing. Mine is now much more sensitive; its easier to j/o, and sex is a whole new pleasure.AussieSchlongDomination said:Interesting concept i have actually never heard of this but will look into it, i was circumsised as a baby, and i wanna know what its like to have one
Ette said:This has been an interesting subject to me for some time. Since I refused to circumcize my son despite a huge amount of pressure I read a lot about restoration while hunting for information to show my SO why I refused to circumcize. While he was one of the ones who was putting the pressure on me he is now very glad our son was not mutilated(his words) He has had some problems for a few years and I feel it is because of a very tight cicumcision. He comes from a very uptight family and while I have tried to broach the subject about restoration he gets uptight probably because of the physical prpoblems and the "man" mentality. I would be very interested to hear the differences you who have restored have expereinced, not so much about size but sensitivity and other issues you may have had that sent you down the restoration road. It might help him be able to consider it.
Ette said:If anyone else can add their experiences it might help me convince my SO to perhaps think more about what CAN be done
NineInchCock_160IQ said:To me, the foreskin looks gross.
dxjnorto said:Am I the only one who thinks it's weird to say this? Look in the galleries bro'. Most men on this forum, like most men in the world are genitally intact.
Your concerns are purely cultural.
chico8 said:I also can't imagine why you would feel so strongly against my doing something that has restored to me, at least a little, what was robbed from me soon after birth. If I was to go to the gym and exercise on a daily basis until I looked like some muscle stud, would you find that equally as gross?
You haven't even seen my dick, nor have I asked for your comments on how "pretty" it may look. The whole point of this thread is to point out to guys like me, who were cut too tight or are simply dissatisfied with being cut that there are options available to them to get some of what was lost, back. It may not appeal to you and you may be happy with having had your foreskin removed but a lot of guys aren't.
NineInchCock_160IQ said:maybe, but that doesn't change my opinion of what makes an aesthetically-pleasing penis. Why is that weird? I think they look gross, get over it. I don't have a problem with other people loving them. I couldn't possibly care less, why does it matter to anyone else what I think on this issue?
chico8 said:My penis had become so desensitized that reaching orgasm was possible only through extremely rough masturbation.
The gliding sensation of the foreskin over the glans and what remains of my frenulum is absolutely exquisite! I no longer need to thrust as hard as I used to and my orgasm is now more of a total body experience. Since my penis is more sensitive, it doesn't take as long to get an erection and they seem to last longer as well.
Possibly because your opinion relates to something about which men have enough hang-ups and worries... so of course people are likely to react in an emotionally charged manner... and because your choice of language was beyond indelicate?NineInchCock_160IQ said:But once again, I don't get why anyone would take such umbrage at me expressing such a personal and inconsequential opinion.
NineInchCock_160IQ said:I don't feel strongly about this at all. I told you very directly, do whatever the hell you want. It doesn't matter to me in the slightest. I was merely expressing my own personal opinion. I don't understand why it matters to you that my opinion is different from yours.
I fully understand every point you made in the last paragraph, I'm not sure what I said to give you the impression that I didn't.
To me, the foreskin looks gross. Intentionally stretching out the skin of your dick is gross. Walking around with little metal balls or sheaths hanging off your dick... also kinda gross. You obviously have strong feelings about this issue pointing the other way, as evidenced in the language you use to describe circumcision and foreskin restoration. and that's fine. It's your penis, do whatever the hell you want with it... you don't need me to think it looks pretty.
chico8 said:Here's what you said:
Obviously you have big issues with foreskin restoration and the foreskin in general. That's fine, a lot of cut guys out there react negatively to foreskins. I think a lot of it has to do with denial. If it gets hard, shoots sperm, and makes me feel good, what's wrong with it? that is the reaction I get from anyone whenever I bring the subject up.
What is it about the circumcised penis that appeals to you? The scar tissue, the keratinized glans, the missing scent, the shrunkenness? I've asked a lot of people the same question and few have given an answer out side of "It just looks better."
Do you think that people look better with their ears docked, noses and lips modified....
I really do want to understand why you think the cut penis looks better.
jeff black said:EEEEASSSY Chico...., don't pick on the guy too bad. He is just expressing his opinion. Some people prefer cut, and some prefer uncut. I think cut is interesting, because you get to see the head, and its shape.
The restoration idea sounds terribly painful and time consuming.
chico8 said:But with an intact penis, all you have to do is roll back half the skin.
Nude beaches are for me, not sexual at all. The human body is much more alluring if clothed, even if only minimally clothed. The same goes for the penis.
It's true that restoration takes time but it's not at all painful. Given that my sex life has improved dramatically since I've begun restoring, it's well worth it.
I still don't understand the allure of the cut dick. That scar tissue is just gross.