Foreskin Restoration

Ed69

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
1,276
Points
258
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
ok granted some people might not approve of circumcision but "foreskin restoration"
are you kidding me?

I agree completely. Just as ridiculous as getting breast reconstruction after a mastectomy. Honestly, who really needs a fake boob? Even sillier is all the vaginal repair going on! All that time and money spent trying to restore a vagina to some semblance of what a girl or woman had before she was raped, mutilated, or gave birth. Really, people get so overworked about other people damaging their genitals. Why can't we let bygones be bygones and just live with it?


Look at a detailed nerve map of the male body. The densest areas are, naturally, the brain and spinal cord. Next come the foreskin, frenulum, and then the finger tips. If someone cut off your finger tips your fingers would still be pretty sensitive, but not have exquisitely detailed sense of touch that the pads of your finger tips do. Only the foreskin and frenulum, both of which are routinely removed during circumcision, are even more sensitive than the finger tips. I'll never know how sensitive or pleasurable that part of my body can be because somebody cut it off before I could even beg them to stop beyond screaming in pain.

We won't get back all those lost nerves but we'll get some semblance of normal function and feeling.

Now do you have an idea? Is their any empathic feeling in you that helps you understand why men restore? Why a growing number of men and women are railing against the entire practice of male genital mutilation?

The penis attached to my body does not belong to doctors, not to my parents, not to my society. My penis is mine and mine alone.
 

Hotrocker

Expert Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Posts
836
Media
0
Likes
113
Points
238
Location
Anchorage (Alaska, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Hotrocker, you've got a prominent glans. That's going to slow you down. Because the preputial closure, preputial lips, preputial opening (whatever you want to call it) is destroyed, it's hard to make the skin hug a large glans like it would if it were natural. That's one of the things that's been slowing me down. If you have a more pointy glans, like Jason's for instance, the skin will fold forward on its own more readily after you've expanded it.

Thank you for the information. I really want to continue ahead with this anyway, regardless of the drawbacks. :) I just want more foreskin :smile:

and my large head is a point of pride! :biggrin1:
 

sinsinasty

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Posts
65
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Location
where do you think
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Female
I agree completely. Just as ridiculous as getting breast reconstruction after a mastectomy. Honestly, who really needs a fake boob? Even sillier is all the vaginal repair going on! All that time and money spent trying to restore a vagina to some semblance of what a girl or woman had before she was raped, mutilated, or gave birth. Really, people get so overworked about other people damaging their genitals. Why can't we let bygones be bygones and just live with it?


Look at a detailed nerve map of the male body. The densest areas are, naturally, the brain and spinal cord. Next come the foreskin, frenulum, and then the finger tips. If someone cut off your finger tips your fingers would still be pretty sensitive, but not have exquisitely detailed sense of touch that the pads of your finger tips do. Only the foreskin and frenulum, both of which are routinely removed during circumcision, are even more sensitive than the finger tips. I'll never know how sensitive or pleasurable that part of my body can be because somebody cut it off before I could even beg them to stop beyond screaming in pain.

We won't get back all those lost nerves but we'll get some semblance of normal function and feeling.

Now do you have an idea? Is their any empathic feeling in you that helps you understand why men restore? Why a growing number of men and women are railing against the entire practice of male genital mutilation?

The penis attached to my body does not belong to doctors, not to my parents, not to my society. My penis is mine and mine alone.

The sensitive area is the HEAD of the penis, not the skin around it, the foreskin is about as sensitive as your elbow, and there is absolutely not evidence that cutting it off does anything except make it look bigger and prevent infection.

Female circumcision involves splicing of the clitoris which would be the equivalent to cutting the head of the penis and maybe that is what youre referring to.
 

D_Lachtmadder Longhorne

Account Disabled
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Posts
115
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
161
The thing is you'll never have a foreskin because it's already been cut off, all you'll have is a piece of skin that's behind the glans that's all stretched out, it won't be a foreskin. A foreskin has a thinner membranous inner skin also and lubricating ducts and all of those factors thrown together make up for the sensitivity of that organ. Covering the glans with elongated skin from the shaft will help the head to be less dry and hopefully enhance the sensations that it already has. If my elbows were as sensitive as my foreskin I would be hurting every time that I leaned on them, so that is not true at all, not in my case. I wonder if that statement was made by a skinless person? We'll never know how it feels for either one unless we've had skin and then had it removed to do that comparison.
 

sinsinasty

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Posts
65
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Location
where do you think
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Female
The thing is you'll never have a foreskin because it's already been cut off, all you'll have is a piece of skin that's behind the glans that's all stretched out, it won't be a foreskin. A foreskin has a thinner membranous inner skin also and lubricating ducts and all of those factors thrown together make up for the sensitivity of that organ. Covering the glans with elongated skin from the shaft will help the head to be less dry and hopefully enhance the sensations that it already has. If my elbows were as sensitive as my foreskin I would be hurting every time that I leaned on them, so that is not true at all, not in my case. I wonder if that statement was made by a skinless person? We'll never know how it feels for either one unless we've had skin and then had it removed to do that comparison.

Well I have a vagina and a clitoris, so no, it was made by someone with skin. I wonder how sensitive the head of your penis is after several years of being choked by a bag of skin...
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
The sensitive area is the HEAD of the penis, not the skin around it, the foreskin is about as sensitive as your elbow, and there is absolutely not evidence that cutting it off does anything except make it look bigger and prevent infection.

Female circumcision involves splicing of the clitoris which would be the equivalent to cutting the head of the penis and maybe that is what youre referring to.

Can you provide us unbiased proof that the head is the only sensitive part of the penis? I thought not. The foreskin is loaded with extra sensitive nerve endings. Not only that, it prevents the glans from drying out. Dryness is an enemy to good sex. A circumcised dick is dry.

Just as there are many forms of male circumcision, so are there many forms of female circumcision. Some involve little more than the ceremonial drawing of blood. Of course, much of what is practiced in northern Africa is truly horrendous and involves removal of all female external sex organs. To claim that all forms of female circ is far worse than male circ is simply ignorant.
 

SpoiledPrincess

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Posts
7,868
Media
0
Likes
119
Points
193
Location
england
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Where's your scientific evidence that the foreskin is no more sensitive than the elbow?

Choked by a bag of skin? It's protected from the chafing of clothing etc by that 'bag of skin'.
 

sinsinasty

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Posts
65
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Location
where do you think
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Female
Can you provide us unbiased proof that the head is the only sensitive part of the penis? I thought not. The foreskin is loaded with extra sensitive nerve endings. Not only that, it prevents the glans from drying out. Dryness is an enemy to good sex. A circumcised dick is dry.

Just as there are many forms of male circumcision, so are there many forms of female circumcision. Some involve little more than the ceremonial drawing of blood. Of course, much of what is practiced in northern Africa is truly horrendous and involves removal of all female external sex organs. To claim that all forms of female circ is far worse than male circ is simply ignorant.

The foreskin on the penis and the skin on the elbow both contain nerve endings called "stretch receptors". Stretch receptors are designed to allow your skin to stretch, not feel pleasure. This being the reason why circumcision does not even hurt in the early stages of life and why blowjobs dont consist of licking someone's foreskin. The foreskin is expendible, ugly, unecessary, and a haven for smegma bacillus.
 

SpoiledPrincess

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Posts
7,868
Media
0
Likes
119
Points
193
Location
england
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Sorry but that's a ridiculous statement to make that circumcision does not hurt, anyone with any experience of babies will tell you that those babies are definitely feeling extreme pain, the pain response is often not understood in babies and young children, they often respond to pain first with screams then with silence and unscrupulous doctors will use this as evidence that it doesn't hurt. That's bullshit.

Incidentally women also produce smegma, when are you having your clit excised?
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The thing is you'll never have a foreskin because it's already been cut off, all you'll have is a piece of skin that's behind the glans that's all stretched out, it won't be a foreskin.

The truth is it depends. What it depends upon is the amount of inner mucosal skin left after the circumcision. Some circumcisions remove all the inner skin while others try to preserve it. Fortunately, most men have at least some remaining inner skin from which to work. The goal is to get that inner skin to become truly inner once again by growing more outer shaft skin.

If you look at many pictures of penises you can see the circumcision scar. Everything from the scar line to the glans is remaining inner skin. That used to form the inside of the foreskin. Everything from the scar line to the base of the penis is shaft skin. When restoring, the restorer has to vary the tension to allow more shaft skin to grow than inner skin. Done correctly, that inner skin can go back to what it is, truly inner skin. Once done, that inner skin begins to perform the functions it once had of protecting the glans. The frenulum may or may not be gone, and the extremely sensitive frenar band will be gone forever, but you can allow the glans to become the inner organ it once was and the shaft skin to beome its protector and lubricator as it was designed to be. With both the inner skin and the glans protected from external stimulus, both can become more sensitive than they were before while protecting each other and returning the natural gliding function of the foreskin to the penis.
 

Wrey

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Posts
539
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
238
Sexuality
No Response
The foreskin on the penis and the skin on the elbow both contain nerve endings called "stretch receptors". Stretch receptors are designed to allow your skin to stretch, not feel pleasure. This being the reason why circumcision does not even hurt in the early stages of life and why blowjobs dont consist of licking someone's foreskin. The foreskin is expendible, ugly, unecessary, and a haven for smegma bacillus.

These are the very words Hitler used to rationalize the genocide of the Jewish peoples.

You are an ignorant twat.

Expend with anything you like on your body, but leave mine alone. I don't play nice.

>>> whew, that felt good <<<
 

B_Think_Kink

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Posts
10,419
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Gender
Female
The foreskin on the penis and the skin on the elbow both contain nerve endings called "stretch receptors". Stretch receptors are designed to allow your skin to stretch, not feel pleasure. This being the reason why circumcision does not even hurt in the early stages of life and why blowjobs dont consist of licking someone's foreskin. The foreskin is expendible, ugly, unecessary, and a haven for smegma bacillus.
Oh shut up.. you have no clue what the fuck you are talking about. You're expendable, ugly, unnecessary, and a haven for spewing bullshit.
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The foreskin on the penis and the skin on the elbow both contain nerve endings called "stretch receptors". Stretch receptors are designed to allow your skin to stretch, not feel pleasure. This being the reason why circumcision does not even hurt in the early stages of life and why blowjobs dont consist of licking someone's foreskin. The foreskin is expendible, ugly, unecessary, and a haven for smegma bacillus.

Well maybe on YOUR penis the most sensitive part is... Oh wait.... yeah, I thought so.

The labia produces far more smegma than the foreskin ever does. Perhaps we should start cutting those off too?

Truly you have not read anything on the subject of circumcision. Your claims are either outright wrong or outdated. Even the physicians promoting circumcision don't believe that it is painless. You have done zero research.

Either you're a troll or you've got other issues with men and penises that have nothing to do with circumcision. Parading your indignant ignorance in this manner only serves to make yourself into a fool.
 

B_Think_Kink

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Posts
10,419
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Gender
Female
Im EXTREMELY intrigued about getting my foreskin restored... but I don't have any clue how difficult it'll be...

although, heh, I do really wonder what my dick would be like with a foreskin...

:D

Thank you for the information. I really want to continue ahead with this anyway, regardless of the drawbacks. :) I just want more foreskin :smile:

and my large head is a point of pride! :biggrin1:
You should try it... life would be really different. I'll support you all the way. Not that you aren't beautiful, but I believe that everyone should have foreskin. :)
 

milfseeker

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Posts
22
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
86
Location
Reno, NV
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The foreskin on the penis and the skin on the elbow both contain nerve endings called "stretch receptors". Stretch receptors are designed to allow your skin to stretch, not feel pleasure. This being the reason why circumcision does not even hurt in the early stages of life and why blowjobs dont consist of licking someone's foreskin. The foreskin is expendible, ugly, unecessary, and a haven for smegma bacillus.

All good points.
(I'm going to ignore the trolls above who had nothing valuable to add to the conversation).

As far as "restoration" goes, hahahahahahaha
TLC Tugger Tapeless Foreskin Restoration Devices, Products, and Services - Undo Circumcision
omg, priceless
 

SpoiledPrincess

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Posts
7,868
Media
0
Likes
119
Points
193
Location
england
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
If you consider that circumcision doesn't hurt a baby extremely badly then you're nothing less than a deluded moron, join the other troll who insists on believing babies don't feel pain when they're having part of their body cut off.
That it doesn't hurt is probably the sickest defence of all from people who believe in RIC.