Foreskin

[Witlof]

I'm uncut and definitely prefer my partners that way. Can't explain what it is but there is something about the sight of a foreskin that makes me crazy. Yes, they're fun to play with. Yes, they make jerking off easier. But it's more than that. If I've been checking a guy out at the gym and I get to see him in the showers, I'm not so interested in how big he is (although that's important too) but whether's he's uncut. I think that qualifies as a fetish.

 

[carl469]

I'm cut but love Intact men, I love to look and lick. The Intact guys I've been with appreciate having someone who know what to do with their foreskin. For the guys that say that cut guys don't know what to do with their foreskin, well that is probably because they don't teach them about the possibilities and what a real dick is like. You guys with foreskin need to explain that you have more sensitivity and that the foreskin is rich with nerves and is very sensitive, and therefore more a part of your feelings and orgazism. Remember the head of a cut guy is all dryed out and doesn't have very much feeling. They do not know how it feels to have the shaft skin go all the way up and down their penis .

As for when you are with a woman, she get all the feelings without the friction (abrasion). Watch a porn video closely and you will see that a cut mans skin goes in and out with the penis where an intact mans skin stays much stiller and in some cases doesn't move at all while the penis travels freely.

carl469@verizon.net

 

[B_dxjnorto]

I think that qualifies as a fetish.

I think it is rather the reverse. No offense intended at all. My question is why is liking what is normal a fetish?

You and Carl have it completely right and that is a breath of fresh air. Is fresh air a fetish?

 

[D_Tywardreath Landfill]

uncut all the way....nothing better then the smell of a big fat uncut cock

 

[Kentucky_kid]

I'm uncut as well.. Do have to admit though that when I was younger I always used to prefer cut dicks. But hey.. a penis is a penis, cut or uncutt :biggrin1:

 

[tripod]

I'm extremely cut and years ago a bunch of my friends all tagged the same girl and one of them went for a STD test and found out he had something called NGU? I still don't know what it was or maybe it was called something else but men are the carriers and the women get it. Well we all got tested and I was the last to sleep with her and was the only clean one out of the group. I attribute this to my severe circumscision because I really hollowed her out! The incidence HIV in men who are circumcised is much less than in the uncut crowd. Oh yeah you uncut guys get an extra bit of girth with your genitals intact.........lucky bastards.

 

[B_josiah852]

I am uncut and love it. Love the way it looks. If you keep it clean, there is no smell. If you wear a condom there are no std's. When they start cutting off vaginal lips as a norm, I will get circumcised.

 

[B_dxjnorto]

When they start cutting off vaginal lips as a norm, I will get circumcised.

Let's hope that never happens. Since cutting off vaginal lips is falling out of favor in places where it is the norm, let's hope it works the other way around. Some say genital cutting has been around so long it will never go away. Like most sadistic anachronisms, I believe it will go away eventually--at least so low that it will be the unfortunate birthrite of unlucky few fundamentalists only.

Nice fatty Josey.
______________________

Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, Volume 121 Number 25: Page 2994, 20 October 2001.

Ritual Circumcision of Boys
The Council for Medical Ethics states that ritual circumcision of boys is not consistent with
important principles of medical ethics, that it is without medical value, and should not be paid
for with public funds.

The council has sent a statement to the board of the Norwegian Medical Association on this
matter. Among other things, the council says that ritual circumcision of boys has no established
medical benefit. Even with the use of local anaesthesia, the procedure causes pain and is associated
with certain risks of medical complications. The Council for Medical Ethics states that
circumcision of boys is not consistent with important principles of medical ethics laid down as general
determinations in Paragraph 1 of the Norwegian Code of Ethics for Doctors. These require
doctors to uphold human health, and to cure, relieve and comfort. The council points out that it
is an important factor that the child cannot give consent.

According to the council, doctors should be allowed to refuse to perform ritual circumcision as
a matter of conscience. The council makes a point of noting that, when performed, even if not
for medical reasons, that circumcision is a surgical operation that must be carried out according
to correct principles of surgery and with proper anaesthesia. In line with the Code of Ethics
for Doctors ¶12, it should not be paid for by the public health service.

The council invited relevant religious leaders in our community to work on replacing
circumcision with symbolic rituals that do not involve a surgical procedure.
Gulbrandsen, Tidsskriftet; pal.gulbrandsen@legeforeningen.no

This original of this article may be found at URL: http://www.tidsskriftet.no/pls/lts/PA_LTS.Vis_Seksjon?vp_SEKS_ID=419642

 

[MonsterUncut]

Uncut here also, and have to agree, I also have alot of foreskin, wouldn't have it any other way!

 

[cyrushkcurtis]

Do you prefer uncut or cut?

I don't know that I have a preference. Certainly the vast majority of men and boys I've seen have been cut.


Are you uncut or cut?

I'm cut, but my dad's uncut, and my paternal grandfather was cut.


Reasons for liking cut or uncut?

Often, but certainly not always, cut looks better.

 

[moshik12]

i perfer cut