See, but thats where you are joining this a little late. The only reference Vinyl had made was that he was "married to a white man". It wasn't something had any bearing on the current poilitical conversation we were having. It only became relevant when he made a threat to shove a dick down my throat. So, I wasnt the one who brought gender or sex into the conversation.
I guess I didn't make this clear originally. But first, I will start by giving you credit to correct yourself after you realized your mistake.
However, the fact that it didn't have anything the political conversation is moot. Even the fact that you didn't bring up gender is irrelevant (though you did hand pick that comment out of the whole reply to respond to). My point was, and still is, you made an assumption based of an incredibly innocuous phrase. Then you used that assumption as a jab at VinylBoy, and you didn't even check to see if your assumption was right. Then afterward, when you get criticized for your mistake, lightly I might add, you play it off. Saying "oh I guess I should check gender and blah blah blah for politics", like it is ridiculous. Except you isolated the gender comment, which again was only a small part of the reply. You made your reply purely off that. And yet you didn't check to see if you were right. What's really amazing is how you couldn't know, it is literally in your face. It gives his gender right under his avatar, which is right next to all of his replies. And it gives his sexual orientation right there to. And to top this all off of course, is the fact that his username is Vinyl
Boy. Based purely off his username, even if his gender and orientation weren't right there, you should be able to deduce two very basic things. Firstly, he either likes vinyl records, or that he is/was a DJ/Musician. And secondly that he is a man. That is the easy one to get. Combine that with the fact that he said he married a white man, and a general idea of what his orientation should be easy to deduce.
If anything, it would actually show that I was taking their comments for being pure, and that gender, race or preference wasn't affecting my ability to accept or recognize their beliefs. Would it have been more appropriate to just chalk them up to a gay, liberal black man, what a surprise he is a Democrat? Or wouldn't that imply the same narrowmindedness that you liberals so blatantly accuse Conservatives of? The true issue is that the bleeders are exactly the same as those they swear to hate and disgust.
Nice try, giving yourself some kind of credit for your stupid mistake. It doesn't highlight your supposed tolerance, only your ignorance. I will say it doesn't discredit your supposed tolerance. However that line about narrow mindedness does. After all, you are coloring a group of people as narrow minded, because they are liberals.
