Not so different from you assertion that the GOP party couldn't nominate Powell as a presidential nominee.
(Responded in the wrong thread)
As I said in my reply to your misposted response, my assessment of Powell's chances of being nominated by the GOP was clearly my OPINION, and they have yet to prove me wrong on
that account.
But since we're examining presuppositions here, I find it odd you'd suggest that black folk in my city might have voted for Landrieu because Obama endorsed him, but you gave NO consideration to the possibility that Obama opponents and/or some whites may have voted AGAINST him because of it.
Just as interesting your earlier statement (in another thread) that 95% of black folk vote for black candidates, solely based on that candidate's race (a position you seem to cling to in spite of acknowledging yourself that it was an "ignorant" thing to say). But oddly you make NO mention of even the POSSIBILITY that
some white folk may vote against a black candidate for that exact same reason. (Or perhaps you think
they couldn't possibly be guilty of anything so rankly IGNORANT as being racially prejudiced for or against a candidate.)
Get my drift? Cuts both ways, doesn't it?
But hey, champ. That's quite alright. Let 'em keep right on with underestimating US. Keep making stupid assumptions, keep trying to disenfranchise, discourage, and intimidate voters, keep trying to impede our ability to vote by closing polls up early and all that other dirty sh*t they like to pull.
WHATEVER you do, GOP, DON'T listen to Powell.