Frankenstein

Discussion in 'Celebrity Endowments' started by EnglishMan, Apr 12, 2011.

  1. EnglishMan

    EnglishMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    279
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London, England
    Just saw Frankenstein at London's National Theatre.
    The part of the Monster & Frankenstein are played alternatively by Johnny Lee Miller & Benedict Cumberbatch.

    The first ten minutes is of the monster being born, who is totally naked for the whole of the first scene.
    Although he is born in dim light, from time to time the lights do flash to full.

    He is being born, so he is writhing about on the floor, and learning to walk.
    Nothing is left to the imagination.
    Cumberbatch (whom I saw as the monster, and is Sherlock Holmes in the new BBC adaptation) has a fairly small cock and tight balls. And although he has a good body, he is fairly sexless.
    From where I was sitting in the fourth row, his arse at times was almost in our faces. A few times as he is trying to stand he has his arse to the audience and we were faced with a full on view of his ball sac and cock as he raised his arse in the air. (I would say hanging, but neither were)

    My biggest regret is that I didn't get to see Johnny Lee Miller as The Monster, as I'm sure he would have been a lot hotter naked, and I would have been more interested to see what he has hanging between his legs.

    Has anyone else seen the production. Has anyone seen Miller as the monster
     
  2. Ninja81

    Ninja81 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    We could always ask Angelina... :wink:
     
  3. superbot

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    53
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Great Britain
    ...I hear it's sensational.You've made want to see it,for it's artistic merit OF COURSE!!
     
  4. EnglishMan

    EnglishMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    279
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London, England
    of course
     
  5. uberhund

    uberhund Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yes, I went to see Daniel Radcliffe in Equus all that time ago, and his artistic merit wasn't awfully big either...
     
  6. cgttown

    cgttown Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    462
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Hmm....I'd heard good reviews on Radcliffe's "artistry." I thought he was supposed to have an impressive wand. (Ok, ok, I know it was a bad joke.)
     
  7. Bimanhung

    Bimanhung Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    266
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I saw Daniel Radcliff in Equus in London. He was a very normal and unimpressive size. Great performance, though.
     
  8. D_Dom_Focker

    D_Dom_Focker New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    1
    was Benedict cut or uncut?
     
  9. leapyear

    leapyear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    2
    I saw both versions (the role of the monster and the professor are switched by the leads every performance) - live like you with Benedict CUMBERPATCH as the monster - yes, small and uncut and then went to see the filmed HD version in the cinema with Jonny Lee MILLER as the monster but was surprised to see that for the filmed version(s) the monster is clad in a cloth loincloth. Sigh.

    I preferred Miller's turn as the monster but regardless both actors were absolutely amazing in one of the best live adaptations I've ever witnessed. Frankly I was glad this hasn't been discussed (as Daniel RADCLIFF was ad nauseam with every perv whipping out their damn mobile to snap his cock and the moronic debate that ensued 'was it cut, uncut or partially cut?'...) To save f'n Matt COHEN from asking his endlessly repetitive enquiry; as both are English borne it is safe to assume that both actors are uncut. Nah nah.
     
  10. poppinfresh

    poppinfresh New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Nevada
    Modern day frankenstein...bits and pieces from all hotties...talk about making your perfect man....minus the large scars...lol...
     
  11. oriental-lad

    oriental-lad New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    I saw Jonny Lee Miller in February and Benedict Cumberbatch in April both at the theatre. It is an excellent production.

    I can confirm that BC has a tight, pretty athletic physique and small uncut cock that doesn't really hang much. Probably 2 inches soft if I had to guess. Was in the 6th row.

    JLM has a pretty muscular body (hairless, even though he is a pretty hairy guy). His cock is probably average - nothing huge hanging there, but respectable and yes, bigger than BC as there seemed to be a lot more hanging down. Maybe 4 inches soft, maybe more. Was in 13th row, so not such a close view. So, to the OP, sorry, yes, JLM was also sexier!:smile:
     
    #11 oriental-lad, Apr 17, 2011
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2011
  12. B_IanTheTall

    B_IanTheTall New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    NE Ohio, USA
    In a few of Johnny Lee Miller's scenes, in Emma, his flat front beige britches showed a nice bulge. Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock has already aired once state side, the series will be be repeated again. Both were part of the Masterpiece program, on PBS.
     
  13. EnglishMan

    EnglishMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    279
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London, England
    Unfortunately for those of you who will see a screening in either a cinema or on TV, there is no nudity.
    I think they wear nappies or something.

    I also believe the naked female is also covered in the recorded version.

    There's censorship for yah!
     
  14. leapyear

    leapyear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    2
    The monsterette bares her breasts but she too dons a loincloth downstairs in the HD film(s). I didn't see it as censorship per se as much as gross market capitalism to ensure a wider global screening. I was surprised that Danny BOYLE approved the modification and will try to see if I can find an interview explaining his decision...
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted